BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2009, Volume: 22 Issue: 3, 225 - 232, 19.06.2015

Abstract

-

References

  • 1. Jenkins K, Grady D, Wong J, Correa R, Armanious S, Chung F. Post-operative recovery: day surgery patients’preferences. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 272-274.
  • 2. Ben David B, Levin H, Solomon E, Admoni H, Vaida S. Spinal bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: The effect of saline dilution. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 716-720.
  • 3. Patel NJ, Flashburg MH, Paskin S, Grossman R. Regional anesthetic technique compared to general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 185-187.
  • 4. Pavlin DJ, Rapp SE, Polissar NL, Malmgren JA, Koerschgen M, Keyes H. Factors affecting discharge time in adult outpatients. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 816- 826.
  • 5. Pollock Je, Mulroy MF, Bent E, Polissar NL. A comparison of two regional anesthetic techniques for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 397-401.
  • 6. Casati A, Cappelleri G, Fanelli G, Borghi B, Anelati D, Berti M, et al. Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 543-547.
  • 7. Heidvall M, Hein A, Davidson S, Jakobsson J. Cost comparison between three different general anaesthetic techniques for elective arthroscopy of knee. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan 2000; 44: 157-162.
  • 8. Jacobson E, Forssblad M, Rosenberg J, Westman L, Weidenhielm L. Can local anesthesia be recommended for routine use in elective knee arthroscopy? A comparison between local, spinal, and general anesthesia. Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 183-190.
  • 9. Forssblad M, Weidenhielm L. Knee arthroscopy in local versus general anaesthesia: the incidence of reartroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999; 7: 323-326.
  • 10. Dahl V, Gierloff C, Omland E, Raeder JC. Spinal, epidural or propofol anaesthesia for outpatient knee
  • arthroscopy? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997; 41: 1341- 1345.
  • 11. Trieshmann H. Knee arthroscopy: a cost analysis of general and local anesthesia. Arthroscopy 1996; 12: 60- 63.
  • 12. Mulroy MF. Local and regional anesthesia. In: White PF, ed. Ambulatory Anesthesia& Surgery. London: W.B. Saunders Company Ltd, 1993:406-433.
  • 13. Parnass SM, McCarthy RJ, Bach BR, et al. Beneficial impact of epidural anesthesia on recovery after outpatient arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 1993; 9: 91-95.
  • 14. Fisher A, Bryce-Smith R. Spinal analgesic agents. A comparison of cinchocaine, lignocaine and prilocaine. Anaesthesia 1971; 26: 324-329.
  • 15. Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamäki KK, Irjala JK, Jaakkola PW, Pitkänen MT, Korkeila JE. Restricted spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery: a pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16: 2-6.
  • 16. Mulroy M, Larkin KL, Hodgson PS, Helman JD, Pollock JE, Liu SS. A comparison of spinal, epidural and general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 860-864.
  • 17. Neal JM, Deck JJ, Kopacz DJ, Lewis MA. Hospital discharge after ambulatory knee arthroscopy: A comparison of epidural 2-chloroprocaine versus lidocaine. Reg Anesth and Pain Med 2001; 26: 35-40.
  • 18. Reisli R, Celik J, Tuncer S, Yosunkaya A, Otelcioglu S. Anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal versus continuous epidural anaesthesia with prilocaine. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003; 20: 26-30.
  • 19. Takenami T, Yagishita S, Nara Y, Hoka S. Intrathecal mepivacaine and prilocaine are less neurotoxic than lidocaine in a rat intrathecal model. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004; 29: 446-453.
  • 20. Lubarsky DA. Understanding cost analysis. Part I. A practitioners guide to cost behavior. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 519-521.
  • 21. Halpern S, Preston R. Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design. Metaanalyses. Anesthesiology 1994; 81:1376-1383.
  • 22. Freedman J, Li De-Kun, Drasner K, Jaskela M, Larsen B, Wi S. Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia. An epidemiologic study of 1.863 patients. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 633-641.
  • 23. Østgaard G, Hallaråker O, Ulveseth OK, Flaatten H. A randomised study of lidocaine and prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 436- 440.
  • 24. Ben David B, DeMeo PJ, Lucyk C, Solosko D. A comparison of minidose lidocaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia and local anesthesia/propofol infusion for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 319-25

DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2009, Volume: 22 Issue: 3, 225 - 232, 19.06.2015

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma spinal ve epidural anestezide kullanılan tek doz prilokainin hastanın derlenme özellikleri
üzerine etkisinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla planlanmıştır.
Yöntem: Diz artroskopisi geçirecek 40 hasta, 2 mL %2 prilokain ile spinal ya da 15-20 mL %2 prilokain ile
epidural anestezi yapılacak şekilde randomize olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. Hastaların maksimum duyu bloğu
seviyeleri, motor ve duyu bloğunun geri dönüş süreleri, ayağa kalkma zamanları, ilk idrar yapma zamanları,
yan etkiler ve tedavisinde kullanılan ilaçlar kaydedildiler. Hastalar taburcu olduktan 48 saat sonra, telefonla
aranarak, operasyon sonrası ağrıları, analjezik ihtiyaçları, anestezi yönteminden memnuniyetleri, bulantı,
kusma, kaşıntı, belağrısı, dura delinmesine bağlı baş ağrısı, idrar yaparken zorlanma ve geçici nörolojik
semptomlar açısından sorgulandılar.
Bulgular: Maksimum duyu bloğu seviyesi her iki grupta benzerdi. İlacın verilişinden duyu ve motor bloğun
sonlanmasına dek geçen süre ve ayağa kalkma süresi epidural anestezi sonrası belirgin kısa bulundu (p <
0.05). Ek analjezik kullanan hasta sayısı, spinal anestezi sonrası %9 iken, epidural anestezi sonrası %6 idi.
Spinal gruptan bir hastada dura delinmesine bağlı başağrısı görüldü. Hastaların hiçbirinde postoperatif
bulantı, kusma, kaşıntı, bel ağrısı, idrar zorluğu ya da gecici norolojik semptomlar görülmedi. Hasta
memnuniyeti açısından gruplar arasında fark bulunmadı.
Sonuç: Hızlı derlenme süresi nedeniyle prilokain ile epidural anestezi diz artroskopilerinde iyi bir
alternatiftir.

References

  • 1. Jenkins K, Grady D, Wong J, Correa R, Armanious S, Chung F. Post-operative recovery: day surgery patients’preferences. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 272-274.
  • 2. Ben David B, Levin H, Solomon E, Admoni H, Vaida S. Spinal bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: The effect of saline dilution. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 716-720.
  • 3. Patel NJ, Flashburg MH, Paskin S, Grossman R. Regional anesthetic technique compared to general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 185-187.
  • 4. Pavlin DJ, Rapp SE, Polissar NL, Malmgren JA, Koerschgen M, Keyes H. Factors affecting discharge time in adult outpatients. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 816- 826.
  • 5. Pollock Je, Mulroy MF, Bent E, Polissar NL. A comparison of two regional anesthetic techniques for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 397-401.
  • 6. Casati A, Cappelleri G, Fanelli G, Borghi B, Anelati D, Berti M, et al. Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 543-547.
  • 7. Heidvall M, Hein A, Davidson S, Jakobsson J. Cost comparison between three different general anaesthetic techniques for elective arthroscopy of knee. Acta Anaesthesiol Scan 2000; 44: 157-162.
  • 8. Jacobson E, Forssblad M, Rosenberg J, Westman L, Weidenhielm L. Can local anesthesia be recommended for routine use in elective knee arthroscopy? A comparison between local, spinal, and general anesthesia. Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 183-190.
  • 9. Forssblad M, Weidenhielm L. Knee arthroscopy in local versus general anaesthesia: the incidence of reartroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999; 7: 323-326.
  • 10. Dahl V, Gierloff C, Omland E, Raeder JC. Spinal, epidural or propofol anaesthesia for outpatient knee
  • arthroscopy? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997; 41: 1341- 1345.
  • 11. Trieshmann H. Knee arthroscopy: a cost analysis of general and local anesthesia. Arthroscopy 1996; 12: 60- 63.
  • 12. Mulroy MF. Local and regional anesthesia. In: White PF, ed. Ambulatory Anesthesia& Surgery. London: W.B. Saunders Company Ltd, 1993:406-433.
  • 13. Parnass SM, McCarthy RJ, Bach BR, et al. Beneficial impact of epidural anesthesia on recovery after outpatient arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 1993; 9: 91-95.
  • 14. Fisher A, Bryce-Smith R. Spinal analgesic agents. A comparison of cinchocaine, lignocaine and prilocaine. Anaesthesia 1971; 26: 324-329.
  • 15. Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamäki KK, Irjala JK, Jaakkola PW, Pitkänen MT, Korkeila JE. Restricted spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery: a pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16: 2-6.
  • 16. Mulroy M, Larkin KL, Hodgson PS, Helman JD, Pollock JE, Liu SS. A comparison of spinal, epidural and general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 860-864.
  • 17. Neal JM, Deck JJ, Kopacz DJ, Lewis MA. Hospital discharge after ambulatory knee arthroscopy: A comparison of epidural 2-chloroprocaine versus lidocaine. Reg Anesth and Pain Med 2001; 26: 35-40.
  • 18. Reisli R, Celik J, Tuncer S, Yosunkaya A, Otelcioglu S. Anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal versus continuous epidural anaesthesia with prilocaine. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003; 20: 26-30.
  • 19. Takenami T, Yagishita S, Nara Y, Hoka S. Intrathecal mepivacaine and prilocaine are less neurotoxic than lidocaine in a rat intrathecal model. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004; 29: 446-453.
  • 20. Lubarsky DA. Understanding cost analysis. Part I. A practitioners guide to cost behavior. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 519-521.
  • 21. Halpern S, Preston R. Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design. Metaanalyses. Anesthesiology 1994; 81:1376-1383.
  • 22. Freedman J, Li De-Kun, Drasner K, Jaskela M, Larsen B, Wi S. Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia. An epidemiologic study of 1.863 patients. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 633-641.
  • 23. Østgaard G, Hallaråker O, Ulveseth OK, Flaatten H. A randomised study of lidocaine and prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 436- 440.
  • 24. Ben David B, DeMeo PJ, Lucyk C, Solosko D. A comparison of minidose lidocaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia and local anesthesia/propofol infusion for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 319-25
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hatice Türe

Binnaz Ay This is me

Zeynep Eti This is me

F. Yılmaz Göğüş This is me

Publication Date June 19, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 22 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Türe, H., Ay, B., Eti, Z., Göğüş, F. Y. (2015). DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Marmara Medical Journal, 22(3), 225-232.
AMA Türe H, Ay B, Eti Z, Göğüş FY. DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Marmara Med J. August 2015;22(3):225-232.
Chicago Türe, Hatice, Binnaz Ay, Zeynep Eti, and F. Yılmaz Göğüş. “DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Marmara Medical Journal 22, no. 3 (August 2015): 225-32.
EndNote Türe H, Ay B, Eti Z, Göğüş FY (August 1, 2015) DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Marmara Medical Journal 22 3 225–232.
IEEE H. Türe, B. Ay, Z. Eti, and F. Y. Göğüş, “DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, Marmara Med J, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 225–232, 2015.
ISNAD Türe, Hatice et al. “DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Marmara Medical Journal 22/3 (August 2015), 225-232.
JAMA Türe H, Ay B, Eti Z, Göğüş FY. DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Marmara Med J. 2015;22:225–232.
MLA Türe, Hatice et al. “DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, 2015, pp. 225-32.
Vancouver Türe H, Ay B, Eti Z, Göğüş FY. DİZ ARTROSKOPİSİ CERRAHİSİNDE PRİLOKAİN İLE YAPILAN SPİNAL VE EPİDURAL ANESTEZİNİN DERLENME ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Marmara Med J. 2015;22(3):225-32.