MANYETİK REZONANS GÖRÜNTÜLEME VE ANESTEZİ

Year 2006, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 98 - 103, 26.06.2015

Berrin Işık

Abstract

Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ünitesi anestezist için ortamdan, hastadan, işlemden kaynaklanan farklı özellikleri taşıyan ve giderek daha fazla talebin olduğu bir uygulama sahasıdır. Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme ünitesinin ve burada anestezi uygulanan hasta grubunun özelliklerinin bilinmesi hasta ve çalışanların güvenliği yanında verimliliği de artıracaktır. Bu yazıda MRG ünitesinde sürdürülen anestezi uygulamalarının derlenerek bildirilmesi hedeflenmiştir.

Keywords

Manyetik Rezonans, Görüntüleme, Anestezi

References

• 1. Formica D, Silvestri S. Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview. Biomed Eng Online 2004;3:11.
• 2. Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Prochaska G, Tait AR. Sedation failures in children undergoing MRI and CT: is temperament a factor? Paediatr Anaesth 2000;10: 319–23.
• 3. Eric E, Weissend EE, Litman RS. Paediatric anaesthesia outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2001;14: 437–40.
• 4. Gooden CK. Anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2004;17: 339–42.
• 5. Haeseler G, Zuzan O, Kohn G, Pienbrak S, Leuwer M. Anaesthesia with midazolam and S(+) ketamine in spontaneously breathing paediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging. Paediatr Anaesth 2000; 10: 513–9.
• 6. Peden CJ, Menon DK, Hall AS, Sargentoni J, Whitwam JG. Magnetic resonance for the anaesthetist. Part II: Anaesthesia and monitoring in MR units. Anaesthesia 1992;47: 508–17.
• 7. Shellock FG, Crues 3rd JV. MR safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1349–52.
• 8. [No authors listed]Magnetic resonance diagnostic device; panel recommendation and report on petitions for magnetic resonance reclassification and codification of reclassification-FDA. Final rule. Fed Regist 1989,1;54: 5077–8.
• 9. Colletti PM. Size "H" oxygen cylinder: accidental MR projectile at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19: 141–3.
• 10. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004;232:635–52.
• 11. Chaljub G, Kramer LA, Johnson RF 3rd, Johnson RF, Singh H, Crow WN. Projectile Cylinder Accidents Resulting from the Presence of Ferromagnetic Nitrous Oxide or Oxygen Tanks in the MR Suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177: 27–30.
• 12. Tope WD, Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance imaging and permanent cosmetics (tattoos): survey of complications and adverse events. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15(2):180–4.
• 13. Vahlensieck M. Tattoo-related cutaneous inflammation (burn grade I) in a mid-field MR scanner. Eur Radiol 2000;10: 197.
• 14. Wagle WA, Smith M. Tattoo-induced skin burn during MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1795.
• 15. http://www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/sta ndards
• 16. http://www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/sta ndards
• 17. Kotob F, Twersky RS. Anesthesia outside the operating room: general overview and monitoring standards. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2003;41: 1–15.
• 18. Jorgensen NH, Messick JM Jr, Gray J, Nugent M, Berquist TH. ASA monitoring standards and magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 1994;79: 1141–7.
• 19. Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA. Adult claustrophobia, anxiety and sedation in MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15: 51–4.
• 20. Morton G, Gildersleve C, Noise in the MRI scanner. Anaesthesia 2000;55: 1213–4.
• 21. Wagle WA, Smith M. Tattoo-induced skin burn during MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1795.
• 22. Karoo RO, Whitaker IS, Garrido A, Sharpe DT. Full-thickness burns following magnetic resonance imaging: a discussion of the dangers and safety suggestions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114(5):1344–5.
• 23. Karch AM. Don't get burnt by the MRI: transdermal patches can be a hazard to patients. Am J Nurs 2004;104 :31.
• 24. Nelson KL, Gifford LM, Lauber-Huber C, Gross CA, Lasser TA. Clinical safety of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 1995;196:439–43.
• 25. Chu WC, Lam WW, Metreweli C. Incidence of adverse events after IV Injection of MR contrast agents İn a Chinese population: A comparison between gadopentetate and gadodiamide. Acta Radiol 2000;41: 662–6
• 26. Runge VM. Safety of approved MR contrast media for intravenous injection. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12: 205–13.
• 27. De Ridder F, De Maeseneer M, Stadnik T, Luypaert R, Osteaux M. Severe adverse reactions with contrast agents for magnetic resonance: clinical experience in 30,000 MR examinations. JBR-BTR 2001;84: 150–2.
• 28. Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA, Cohan RH. Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:847–9.
• 29. Murphy KP, Szopinski KT, Cohan RH, Mermillod B, Ellis JH. Occurrence of adverse reactions to gadolinium-based contrast material and management of patients at increased risk: a survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology Fellowship Directors. Acad Radiol 1999;6: 656–64.
• 30. Jordan RM, Mintz RD. Fatal reaction to gadopentetate dimeglimune. AMJ Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:743–4.
• 31. Berkenstadt H, Perel A, Ram Z, Feldman Z, Nahtomi-Shick O, Hadani M. Anesthesia for magnetic resonance guided neurosurgery: initial experience with a new open magnetic resonance imaging system. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2001;13: 158–62.
• 32. Schmitz B, Nimsky C, Wendel G, Wienerl J, Ganslandt O, Jacobi K, Fahlbusch R, Schuttler J. Anesthesia during high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging experience with 80 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003;15: 255–62.
• 33. Usher A, Kearney R. Anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in children: a survey of Canadian pediatric centres. Can J Anaest 2003;50: 425.
• 34. Usher AG, Kearney RA, Tsui BC. Propofol total intravenous anesthesia for MRI in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15: 23–8.
• 35. Jurgens S. Sevoflurane conscious sedation for MRI scanning. Anaesthesia 2003;58;296–7.
• 36. Cravero JP, Blike GT. Review of pediatric sedation. Anesth Analg 2004;99: 1355–64.
• 37. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Eldevik OP, Rockwell DT, Wong SH, Tait AR. Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: adverse events and outcomes. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 743–8.
• 38. Keengwe IN, Hedge S, Dearlove O, Wilson B, Yates RW, Sharples A. Structured sedation programme for magnetic resonance imaging examination in children. Anaesthesia 1999;54: 1069–72.
• 39. De Sanctis Briggs V. Magnetic resonance imaging under sedation in newborns and infants: a study of 640 cases using sevoflurane. Paediatr Anaesth 2005;15;9–15.
• 40. Gozal D, Gozal Y. Spinal anesthesia for magnetic resonance ımaging examination. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 764.
• 41. Bluemke D, Breiter SN. Sedation procedures in MR imaging: safety, effectiveness, and nursing effect on examinations. Radiology 2000; 216:645– 52.
• 42. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Prochaska G, Tait AR. Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children. Pediatrics 2000;105E42.
• 43. Işık B, Tekgül ZT. Hurler sendromlu olguda magnetik rezonans görüntüleme sırasında anestezi yaklaşımımız. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;11: 259–63.
• 44. Sandner-Kıeslıng A, Schwarz G, Vıcenzı M, Fall A, James RL, Ebner F Werner F. Side-effects after inhalational anaesthesia for paediatric cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. Paediatr Anaesth 2002;12: 429–37.
• 45. Cravero JP, Beach M, Thyr B, Whalen K. The effect of small dose fentanyl on the emergence characteristics of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;97: 364–7.
• 46. Işık B, Arslan M, Tunga AT, Kurtipek Ö. Dexmedetomidine decreases emergence agitation in pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery. Pediatric Anesthesia 2006; 16: 748-53.
• 47. Işık B, Arslan M, Tunga AT, Kurtipek Ö. Farklı zamanlarda uygulanan fentanilin derlenme ajitasyonu üzerine etkisi. Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2005;33: 441–417.