Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2021, Volume: 34 Issue: 3, 307 - 311, 27.10.2021
https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1013319

Abstract

References

  • [1] Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, et al. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60:3072-80. doi:10.1002/art.24853
  • [2] Blomberg RG, Olsson SS. The lumbar epidural space in patients examined with epiduroscopy. Anesth Analg 1989; 68:157-60. doi:10.1213/00000.539.198902000-00016
  • [3] Hussain A, Erdek M. Interventional pain management for failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Pract 2014; 14:64-78. doi:10.1111/papr.12035
  • [4] Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:794-810. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0707136
  • [5] Manchikanti L, Boswell MV, Rivera JJ, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis in chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain. BMC Anesthesiol. 2005; 5:10. doi:10.1186/1471-2253-5-10
  • [6] Geurts JW, Kallewaard JW, Richardson J, Groen GJ. Targeted methylprednisolone acetate/hyaluronidase/clonidine injection after diagnostic epiduroscopy for chronic sciatica: a prospective, 1-year follow-up study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27:343-52. doi:10.1053/rapm.2002.27175
  • [7] Sakai T, Aoki H, Hojo M, et al. Adhesiolysis and targeted steroid/local anesthetic injection during epiduroscopy alleviates pain and reduces sensory nerve dysfunction in patients with chronic sciatica. J Anesth. 2008;22(3):242-247. doi:10.1007/s00540.008.0616-4.
  • [8] Avellanal M, Diaz-Reganon G, Orts A, Gonzalez-Montero L, Riquelme I. Transforaminal epiduroscopy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Physician2019; 22:89-95.
  • [9] Geudeke MW, Krediet AC, Bilecen S, Huygen FJPM, Rijsdijk M. Effectiveness of epiduroscopy for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Pract 2021; 21:468-1. doi: 10.1111/papr.12974.
  • [10] Saberski LR, Kitahata LM. Direct visualization of the lumbosacral epidural space through the sacral hiatus. Anesth Analg 1995; 80:839-40. doi:10.1097/00000.539.199504000- 00035
  • [11] Bosscher HA, Heavner JE. Incidence and severity of epidural fibrosis after back surgery: an endoscopic study. Pain Pract 2010; 10:18-24. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00311.x
  • [12] Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Damron KS, Pampati V, Falco FJ. A randomized, double-blind controlled trial of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in central spinal stenosis: 2-year follow-up. Pain Physician 2015; 18:79-92.
  • [13] Lodh M, Goswami B, Mahajan RD, Sen D, Jajodia N, Roy A. Assessment of Vitamin D status of chronic in patients low back pain of unknown etiology. Indian J Clin Biochem 2015; 30:174-9. doi:10.1007/s12291.014.0435-3
  • [14] Pereira P, Severo M, Monteiro P, et al. Results of lumbar endoscopic adhesiolysis using a radiofrequency catheter in patients with postoperative fibrosis and persistent or recurrent symptoms after discectomy. Pain Pract 2016; 16:67- 79. doi:10.1111/papr.12266
  • [15] Raffaeli W, Righetti D. Surgical radio-frequency epiduroscopy technique (R-ResAblator) and FBSS treatment: preliminary evaluations. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005; 92:121-5. doi:10.1007/3-211-27458-8_26
  • [16] Jo DH, Kim ED, Oh HJ. The Comparison of the result of epiduroscopic laser neural decompression between FBSS or not. Korean J Pain 2014; 27:63-7. doi:10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.63.
  • [17] Chopra P, Smith HS, Deer TR, Bowman RC. Role of adhesiolysis in the management of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain Physician 2005; 8:87-100.
  • [18] Saberski LR. A retrospective analysis of spinal canal endoscopy and laminectomy outcomes data. Pain Physician 2000; 3:193-6.
  • [19] Manchikanti. L., Pakanati R.R., Pampati V, Fellows B. Review papers-the value and safety of epidural endoscopic adhesiolysis-epidural endoscopy has been considered an expensive conservative modality; this study evaluated its overall effectiveness. Am J Anesthesiol 2000; 27: 275-82.
  • [20] Gill JB, Heavner JE. Visual impairment following epidural fluid injections and epiduroscopy: a review. Pain Med 2005; 6:367-74. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00062.x
  • [21] Manchikanti L. Role of neuraxial steroids in interventional pain management. Pain Physician 2002; 5:182-99.
  • [22] Heavner J E, Wyatt DE, Bosscher HA. Lumbosacral epiduroscopy complicated by intravascular injection. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists KISA HALİ?? 2007; 107:347-50.
  • [23] Marchesini M, Flaviano E, Bellini V, Baciarello M, Bignami EG. Complication of epiduroscopy: a brief review and case report. Korean J Pain 2018; 31:296-304. doi:10.3344/ kjp.2018.31.4.296

The efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic back pain after surgery

Year 2021, Volume: 34 Issue: 3, 307 - 311, 27.10.2021
https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1013319

Abstract

Objective:Chronic back pain is a common problem with unwanted effects on the quality of life. The choice of treatment is usually
patient-specific, but the use of epiduroscopic minimal invasive procedure is increasing. Epiduroscopy avoids surgical complications
and improves patient comfort. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of epiduroscopy in patients with failed back surgery
syndrome (FBSS) and in patients without previous back surgery.
Patients and Methods: Forty-one ASA I-II-III patients aged 18–80 years old, with chronic back pain, radiologically and clinically
diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and FBSS after laminectomy, hemilaminectomy, lumbar discectomy or lumbar spinal
stabilization were included retrospectively. Patients were stratified as Group (O) with FBSS and Group (N) without previous back
surgery. Baseline visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were obtained before treatment. During the 1st, 2nd and 3rd follow-ups, VAS
scores of patients were measured.
Results: Visual analogue scale scores decreased significantly at 1, 2, and 3 months after epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in both groups. The
differences in VAS scores of patients with and without previous back surgery were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Epiduroscopic adhesiolysis neuroplasty was followed by a significant decrease in chronic back pain in LSS and FBSS
patients .

References

  • [1] Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, et al. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60:3072-80. doi:10.1002/art.24853
  • [2] Blomberg RG, Olsson SS. The lumbar epidural space in patients examined with epiduroscopy. Anesth Analg 1989; 68:157-60. doi:10.1213/00000.539.198902000-00016
  • [3] Hussain A, Erdek M. Interventional pain management for failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Pract 2014; 14:64-78. doi:10.1111/papr.12035
  • [4] Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:794-810. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0707136
  • [5] Manchikanti L, Boswell MV, Rivera JJ, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis in chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain. BMC Anesthesiol. 2005; 5:10. doi:10.1186/1471-2253-5-10
  • [6] Geurts JW, Kallewaard JW, Richardson J, Groen GJ. Targeted methylprednisolone acetate/hyaluronidase/clonidine injection after diagnostic epiduroscopy for chronic sciatica: a prospective, 1-year follow-up study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27:343-52. doi:10.1053/rapm.2002.27175
  • [7] Sakai T, Aoki H, Hojo M, et al. Adhesiolysis and targeted steroid/local anesthetic injection during epiduroscopy alleviates pain and reduces sensory nerve dysfunction in patients with chronic sciatica. J Anesth. 2008;22(3):242-247. doi:10.1007/s00540.008.0616-4.
  • [8] Avellanal M, Diaz-Reganon G, Orts A, Gonzalez-Montero L, Riquelme I. Transforaminal epiduroscopy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Physician2019; 22:89-95.
  • [9] Geudeke MW, Krediet AC, Bilecen S, Huygen FJPM, Rijsdijk M. Effectiveness of epiduroscopy for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Pract 2021; 21:468-1. doi: 10.1111/papr.12974.
  • [10] Saberski LR, Kitahata LM. Direct visualization of the lumbosacral epidural space through the sacral hiatus. Anesth Analg 1995; 80:839-40. doi:10.1097/00000.539.199504000- 00035
  • [11] Bosscher HA, Heavner JE. Incidence and severity of epidural fibrosis after back surgery: an endoscopic study. Pain Pract 2010; 10:18-24. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00311.x
  • [12] Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Damron KS, Pampati V, Falco FJ. A randomized, double-blind controlled trial of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in central spinal stenosis: 2-year follow-up. Pain Physician 2015; 18:79-92.
  • [13] Lodh M, Goswami B, Mahajan RD, Sen D, Jajodia N, Roy A. Assessment of Vitamin D status of chronic in patients low back pain of unknown etiology. Indian J Clin Biochem 2015; 30:174-9. doi:10.1007/s12291.014.0435-3
  • [14] Pereira P, Severo M, Monteiro P, et al. Results of lumbar endoscopic adhesiolysis using a radiofrequency catheter in patients with postoperative fibrosis and persistent or recurrent symptoms after discectomy. Pain Pract 2016; 16:67- 79. doi:10.1111/papr.12266
  • [15] Raffaeli W, Righetti D. Surgical radio-frequency epiduroscopy technique (R-ResAblator) and FBSS treatment: preliminary evaluations. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005; 92:121-5. doi:10.1007/3-211-27458-8_26
  • [16] Jo DH, Kim ED, Oh HJ. The Comparison of the result of epiduroscopic laser neural decompression between FBSS or not. Korean J Pain 2014; 27:63-7. doi:10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.63.
  • [17] Chopra P, Smith HS, Deer TR, Bowman RC. Role of adhesiolysis in the management of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain Physician 2005; 8:87-100.
  • [18] Saberski LR. A retrospective analysis of spinal canal endoscopy and laminectomy outcomes data. Pain Physician 2000; 3:193-6.
  • [19] Manchikanti. L., Pakanati R.R., Pampati V, Fellows B. Review papers-the value and safety of epidural endoscopic adhesiolysis-epidural endoscopy has been considered an expensive conservative modality; this study evaluated its overall effectiveness. Am J Anesthesiol 2000; 27: 275-82.
  • [20] Gill JB, Heavner JE. Visual impairment following epidural fluid injections and epiduroscopy: a review. Pain Med 2005; 6:367-74. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00062.x
  • [21] Manchikanti L. Role of neuraxial steroids in interventional pain management. Pain Physician 2002; 5:182-99.
  • [22] Heavner J E, Wyatt DE, Bosscher HA. Lumbosacral epiduroscopy complicated by intravascular injection. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists KISA HALİ?? 2007; 107:347-50.
  • [23] Marchesini M, Flaviano E, Bellini V, Baciarello M, Bignami EG. Complication of epiduroscopy: a brief review and case report. Korean J Pain 2018; 31:296-304. doi:10.3344/ kjp.2018.31.4.296
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Hakki Olculu This is me

Kursat Gul This is me

Seniyye Ulgen Zengın This is me

Publication Date October 27, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 34 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Olculu, H., Gul, K., & Zengın, S. U. (2021). The efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic back pain after surgery. Marmara Medical Journal, 34(3), 307-311. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1013319
AMA Olculu H, Gul K, Zengın SU. The efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic back pain after surgery. Marmara Med J. October 2021;34(3):307-311. doi:10.5472/marumj.1013319
Chicago Olculu, Hakki, Kursat Gul, and Seniyye Ulgen Zengın. “The Efficacy of Epiduroscopic Adhesiolysis in Patients With Chronic Back Pain After Surgery”. Marmara Medical Journal 34, no. 3 (October 2021): 307-11. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1013319.
EndNote Olculu H, Gul K, Zengın SU (October 1, 2021) The efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic back pain after surgery. Marmara Medical Journal 34 3 307–311.
IEEE H. Olculu, K. Gul, and S. U. Zengın, “The efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic back pain after surgery”, Marmara Med J, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 307–311, 2021, doi: 10.5472/marumj.1013319.
ISNAD Olculu, Hakki et al. “The Efficacy of Epiduroscopic Adhesiolysis in Patients With Chronic Back Pain After Surgery”. Marmara Medical Journal 34/3 (October 2021), 307-311. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1013319.
JAMA Olculu H, Gul K, Zengın SU. The efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic back pain after surgery. Marmara Med J. 2021;34:307–311.
MLA Olculu, Hakki et al. “The Efficacy of Epiduroscopic Adhesiolysis in Patients With Chronic Back Pain After Surgery”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, 2021, pp. 307-11, doi:10.5472/marumj.1013319.
Vancouver Olculu H, Gul K, Zengın SU. The efficacy of epiduroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic back pain after surgery. Marmara Med J. 2021;34(3):307-11.