CT-guided lung biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication rates of biopsy techniques

Year 2022, Volume: 35 Issue: 2, 219 - 224, 30.05.2022

Muhammed Akif Denız Caglayan Cakır Fatih Kılınc Osman Kurt Zelal Tas Denız

https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1120552

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and complication rates of computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle
biopsy and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB).
Materials and

Methods: Patients who underwent CT-guided lung mass biopsy were included. The patients were evaluated in terms of
age, gender, lesion diameter, lesion localization, depth of the mass, type of biopsy procedure (core needle biopsies and FNAB).

Results: The accuracy rate of FNAB in diagnostic material was found to be 100% in terms of benign, malignant and all lesions. The
specificity and sensitivity of FNAB was found to be 100%. The diagnostic accuracy rate of core needle biopsy was found to be 70%
in benign lesions, 100% in malignant lesions. The specificity of core needle biopsy was 90% and sensitivity 100%. There was no
statistically significant difference between the two biopsy techniques in terms of complications.

Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that the diagnostic rates of FNAB and core needle biopsy were close in malignant lesions, the
diagnostic rate of core needle biopsy was higher in benign lesions, and there was no difference in terms of complications in both
biopsy techniques.

Keywords

Lung, Mass, Transthoracic biopsy, Computed tomography

References

• [1] Richardson CM, Pointon KS, Manhire AR, Macfarlane JT. Percutaneous lung biopsies: a survey of UK practice based on 5444 biopsies. Br J Radiol 2002;75: 731-5. doi:10.1259/ bjr.75.897.750731
• [2] Brioulet J, David A, Sagan C, Cellerin L, Frampas E, Morla O. Percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy for the diagnosis of persistent pulmonary consolidation. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020;101:727-32, doi:10.1016/j.diii.2020.07.007
• [3] Yeow KM, See LC, Lui KW, et al. Risk factors for pneumothorax and bleeding after CT-guided percutaneous coaxial cutting needle biopsy of lung lesions. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2001; 12: 1305-12. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61556-5
• [4] Çakır Ö, Çam İ, Koç U, Çiftçi E. Evaluation of major complications associated with percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of lung nodules below 3 cm. Turk J Med Sci 2020;50: 369-74. doi:10.3906/sag-1908-73
• [5] Manhire A, Chairman CM, Clelland C, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax 2003;58:920-36. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920
• [6] Layfield LJ, Coogan A, Johnston WW, et al Transthoracic fine needle aspiration biopsy: sensitivity in relation to guidance technique and lesion size and location. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 687-90. doi: 10.1159/000333940.
• [7] Larscheid RC, Thorpe PE, Scott WJ. Percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: a comprehensive review of its currentrole in the diagnosis and treatment of lung tumors. Chest 1998; 114:704-09. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.3.704.
• [8] Yaffe D, Koslow M, Haskiya H, Shitrit D. A novel technique for CT-guided transthoracic biopsy of lung lesions: improved biopsy accuracy and safety. Eur Radiol 2015;25:3354-60. doi: 10.1007/s00330.015.3750-z.
• [9] Çubuk R, Tasalı N, Midi A, ve ark. Akciğer lezyonlarında bilgisayarlı tomografi eşliğinde transtorasik aspirasyon biopsi sonuçları; işlem, komplikasyonlar ve tanı değeri. Maltepe Tıp Dergisi 2009;1 32-7.
• [10] Shaffer K. Role of radiology for imaging and biopsy of solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 1999; 116:519-22. doi: 10.1378/ chest.116.suppl_3.519s.
• [11] Klein JS, Zarka MA. Transthoracic needle biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:235-66. doi: 10.1016/s0033- 8389(05)70161-5.
• [12] Düzgün F, Tarhan S. Perkütan transtorasik akciğer ve kemik biopsileri. Trd Sem 2015;3:182-91. doi:10.5152/trs.2015.172
• [13] Takeshita J, Masago K, Kato R, et al. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsies of pulmonary lesions: A single-center experience with 750 biopsies in Japan. AJR 2015;204:29-34. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13151.
• [14] Boskovic T, Stanic J, Pena-Karan S, et al. Pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of lung lesions under CT guidance. J Thorac Dis 2014;6(S1):S99-S107.doi:10.3978/j. issn.2072-1439.2013.12.08.
• [15] Drumm O, Eimear A. Joyce E A, Blacam C, et al. CTguided lung biopsy: effect of biopsy-side down position on pneumothorax and chest tube placement. Radiology 2019; 292:190-6. doi:10.1148/radiol.201.918.2321
• [16] Zeng L C, Liao H Q, Wu WB, et al. Effect of puncture sites on pneumothorax after lung CT-guided biopsy. Medicine 2020; 99:e19656. doi: 10.1097/MD.000.000.0000019656
• [17] Yeow K M, Su I-H, Pan K T, et al. Risk factors of pneumothorax and bleeding multivariate analysis of 660 CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsies. Chest 2004;126:748-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.748
• [18] Arıba BK, Dingil G, Ahin G, et al. CT-guided transthoracic biopsy: Factors in pneumothorax risk and diagnostic yield. Nobel Medicus 2019; 7: 1: 37-41. doi: 10.1016/s0009- 9260(03)00221-6.
• [19] Aktas AR, Gozlek E, Yazkan R, et al. Transthoracic biopsy of lung masses: Non technical factors affecting complication occurrence. Thorac Can 2015 ;6:151-8. doi: 10.1111/1759- 7714.12156.
• [20] Chami HA, Faraj W, Yehia ZA, et al. Predictors of pneumothorax after CT-guided transthoracic needle lung biopsy: the role of quantitative CT. Clin Radiol 2015;70:1382- 7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.08.003