The Red-Bull Effect: Causes and Consequences of Overconfidence in Foreign Policy Decision Making
Abstract
Why do foreign policy decision makers take risk in situations that require prudence? Why do they
escalate their commit to a failing course of action? This research examines the impact of overconfidence
in foreign policy decision making. Building on extensive literature in social psychology, the premise of
my argument is that successful past performance leads decision makers to develop overconfidence in
their judgment, capacity and expectations, which bias their risk assessments. Based on this assumption,
I develop a model that explains the causes and consequences of overconfidence in foreign policy
decision making. In the model, past success persuades decision makers to overweight their skills
and knowledge relative to what objective evidence warrants, which generates inordinate risk taking
and exposes decision makers to sever failures. However, belief in success survives despite glaring
setbacks, which convinces decision makers to escalate their commitment to a failing course of action.
Nevertheless, there is a limit to decision makers’ ability to engage in self-deception. Therefore, over the
course of repeated failures, it is expected that the decision makers will make adjustments to correct
overconfident reactions.
Keywords
References
- Allais, Maurice. (1979). “The So-called Allais Paradox and Rational Decisions under Uncertainty.” In Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. eds. Maurice Allais and Ole Hagen. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Arrow, Kenneth J. (1951) “Alternative Approaches to the theory of Choice in Risk taking situations” Econometrica. 19 (4): 4004-437.
- Bar-Hillel, Maya. (1973) “On the Subjective Probability of Compound Events.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 9 (3): 396-406.
- Barber, Brad M., and Terrance Odean. 2000. “Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors.” Journal of Finance 55(2): 773-806.
- Baumeister, Roy F. (1989) “The Optimal Margin of Illusion,” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 8 (2): 176-189.
- Bazerman, Max H. Toni Guiliano, and Allen Appelman. 1984. “Escalation of Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 33: 141-152.
- Bazerman, Max H. (1984) “The Relevance of Kahneman and Tversky’s Concept of Framing to Organizational Behavior.” Journal of Management 10 (3), 333-343.
- Becker, Gordon M., and McClintock, Charles C. (1967) “Value: Behavioral Decision Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 18 (1): 239-68.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
Political Science
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
May 10, 2017
Submission Date
May 10, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 5 Number: Özel Sayı Nisan 2017