The Actor's Attitudes Towards the Principles of Governance: The Case of Maritime Commerce Sector in Turkey

Year 2014, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 81 - 99, 05.02.2015

Fatih Yaman Emrah Yaman

Abstract

This paper asserts that the question about how such a complex, diverse and dynamic sector as maritime commerce can be directed and coordinated in Turkey gives a rise to the idea of governance which is more sensitive to the demands and interests of stakeholders. It also argues that the way to the governance mechanisms that have to be established in the maritime commerce sector is furnished with the concrete governance principles to a large extent. Within this framework the aim of this paper is to analyse actor’s attitudes towards governance principles in the Turkish maritime commerce sector.  In the empirical part, the attitudes of the executives of the institutions and organizations operating in the Turkish maritime commerce sector towards the governance process in theory and in practice are examined with the help of a questionnaire named as “interorganizational governance scale.” This discussion, along with empirical evidence provided by executives of public, private and third sectors, leads to the conclusion that tangible governance mechanisms should be established for proper implementation of the principles of governance.

Keywords

Governance , Governance principles , Maritime commerce sector , Policy-making , Interorganizational governance

Aktörün Yönetişim İlkelerine Yönelik Tavırları: Türkiye’de Deniz Ticareti Sektörü Örnek Olayı

Abstract

Bu makale deniz ticareti gibi karmaşık, çeşitli ve dinamik bir sektörün Türkiye’de nasıl yönetileceği
ve koordine edilebileceği sorusunun paydaşların istek ve beklentilerine daha duyarlı yönetişim düşüncesini ortaya çıkardığını iddia etmektedir. Makale aynı zamanda deniz ticareti sektöründe
kurulması gereken yönetişim mekanizmalarına giden yolun büyük ölçüde somut yönetişim ilkeleri
ile döşendiğini ileri sürmektedir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmanın amacı Türk deniz ticareti sektöründeki
aktörlerin yönetişim ilkelerine yönelik tutumlarını analiz etmektir. Ampirik bölümde Türk deniz
ticaretinde faaliyet gösteren kurum ve kuruluşlardaki üst düzey yöneticilerin teori ve pratikte yönetişim
sürecine karşı tutumları “kurumlararası yönetişim ölçeği” adlı anket formuyla incelenmiştir. Kamu,
özel ve üçüncü sektör yöneticilerinden elde edilen ampirik kanıtlarla birlikte söz konusu tartışma,
yönetişim ilkelerinin tam uygulanabilmesi için somut yönetişim mekanizmalarının kurulması
gerektiği sonucuna ulaşmıştır.

Keywords

Yönetişim , Yönetişim ilkeleri , Deniz ticareti sektörü , Politika oluşturma , Kurumlararası yönetişim

References

• Bache, I. and Flinders, M. (2004) “Multi-Level Governance and the Study of British Politics And Goverment”, Public Policy and Administration, 19(1), 31–52.
• Baker, H. K. and Anderson, R. (2010) Corporate Governance: A Synthesis of Theory, Research and Practice, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Balcı, A. (2006) Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Baş, T. (2008) Anket: Anket Nasıl Hazırlanır? Anket Nasıl Uygulanır? Anket Nasıl Değerlendirilir?, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Borzel, T. A. (2010) “European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(2),191-219.
• Commission of the European Communities (2001) European Governance. A White Paper. COM (2001) 428, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods, Approaches, California: Sage Publications.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1990) Essentials of Psychological Testing, New York: Harper Collins.
• Deming, W. E. (1990) Sample Design in Business Research, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Fitzpatrick, P. and Sohal, A. S. (2002) “IT Governance and Management in Large Australian Organisations”, International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1-2), 97-112.
• Fritz, J.S. (2010) “Towards A New Form of Governance in Science-Policy Relations in the European Maritime Policy”, Marine Policy, 34(1), 1-6.
• Hirst, P. (2000) “Democracy and Governance”, in PIERRE, J. (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2003) “Unravelling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-level Governance”, American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
• IMF (1997) Good Governance: The IMF’s Role, Washington: IMF Publications.
• Jessop, B. (1998) “The Rise of Governance and The Risks Of Failure: The Case of Economic Development”, International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29-45.
• Kersbergen, K. V. and Waarden, F. V. (2004) “Governance As A Bridge Between Disciplines: Cross- Disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts In Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy”, European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143-171.
• Kjaer, A.M. (2004) Governance, Madlen: Polity Press.
• Kooiman, J. (1993) Modern Governance: New Government Society Interactions, London: Sage Publications.
• Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing As Governance, London: Sage Publications.
• Kumar, S. and Hoffman, J. (2002) “Globalization-The Maritime Nexus”, in GRAMMENOS, C. TH. (ed.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business, London: LLP.
• Mamudu, H. M. and Studlar, D. T. (2009) “Multilevel Governance and Shared Sovereignty: European Union Member States and the FCTC”, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 22(1), 73-97.
• Marshall, M. N. (1996) “Sampling for Qualitative Research”, Family Practice, 13(6), 522-525.
• Menteş, H. (2009) Kurumsal Yönetişim ve Türkiye Analizi, İstanbul: Derin Yayınları.
• OECD, (2005) Policy Brief, Public Sector Modernisation: Open Government, February.
• Papadopoulos, Y. (2005) “Taking Stock of Multi-Level Governance”, European Political Science, 4(3), 316-327.
• Peters, B. G. (2000) “Governance and Comparative Politics” in Pierre, J. (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Pierre, J. (2000) “Introduction: Understanding Governance”, in Pierre, J. (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Randİy, T., Down, J. and Jenssen, J. I. (2003) “Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness in Maritime Firms”, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5, 40–54.
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) “The New Governance: Governing Without Government”, Political Studies, 44(4), 652- 667.
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000) “Governance and Public Administration” in Pierre, J. (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Roe, M. (2007) “Shipping Policy and Multi-Level Governance”, Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9, 84–103.
• Roe, M. (2009) “Multi-level and Polycentric Governance: Effective Policymaking for Shipping”, Maritime Policy and Management, 36(1), 39–56.
• Roe, M. (2013) Maritime Governance and Policy-Making, London: Springer.
• Rosenau, J. N. (1992) “Governance, Order and Change in World Politics”, in Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E. O. (eds.) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
• Rosenbaum, A. and Shepherd, A. (2000) “IASIA Symposium on Governance, Responsibility and Social Enhancement: Governance, Good Government and Poverty Reduction”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(2), 269-284.
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2003) Research Methods for Business Students, Sydney: Prentice Hall.
• Sekaran, U. (2002) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Shore, C. (2011) “European Governance or Governmentality? The European Commission and the Future of Democratic Government”, European Law Journal, 17(3), 287-303.
• Skelcher, C. (2005) “Jurisdictional Integrity, Polycentrism and the Design of Democratic Governance”, Governance, 18(1), 89-110.
• Stoker, G. (1998) “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions”, International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17-28.
• Stopford, M. (1997) Maritime Economics, New York: Taylor and Francis Press.
• Stubbs, P. (2005) “Stretching Concepts Too Far? Multi-Level Governance, Policy Transfer and the Politics of Scale in South-East Europe”, Southeast European Politics, VI (2), 66–87.
• Taylor, A. (2002) “Governance” in Blakeley, G. and Bryson, V. (eds.) Contemporary Political Concepts: A Critical Introduction, London: Pluto Press.
• Tokoz, F. (2008) Good Governance: Improving Quality of Life, İstanbul: TESEV Publications.
• Torfing, J. (2005) “Governance Network Theory: Towards A Second Generation”, European Political Science, 4(3), 305-315.
• Turke, R. (2008) Governance. Systematic Foundation and Framework, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
• Williams, D. (2005) Good Governance and Global Governance. Political Studies Association Annual Conference, Leeds.
• World Bank, (2000) Helping Countries Combat Corruption Program at the World Bank since 1997, Washington DC: World Bank Publication.
• Zielonka, J. (2007) “Plurilateral Governance in the Enlarged European Union”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(1), 187-209.