Various inference systems for classification of water quality status: A case study

Volume: 1 Number: 1 December 20, 2012
  • Olcay Hisar
  • Adem Yavuz Sönmez
  • Hasan Kaya
  • Şükriye Aras Hisar
EN

Various inference systems for classification of water quality status: A case study

Abstract

Water quality is considered one of the main factors controlling health and the disease state of humans and animals. Four assessment methods (two pollution indexes and two fuzzy mathematical models) were used to understand the water quality parameter levels and characteristic accurately. Several physico-chemical parameters such as dissolved oxygen, nitrate, nitrite, phosphate, chlor, sulphure and total organic carbon were measured in Karasu River, Turkey. Water quality was assessed as class IV (heavy polluted) in A, B, C and D stations and class III (polluted) in station E with single-factor index method. It was also identified as class III (polluted) for waters in A, B, C and D stations and class II (slightly polluted) for water in station E with the comprehensive index model. Using the two fuzzy mathematical methods (single-factor deciding and weighted average models), the water quality was determined as II, II, III, III and II classes for waters in A, B, C, D and E stations, respectively. In conclusion, it can be proposed that fuzzy logic assessment methods may also be used as an alternative tool for decision-making in environmental management.

Keywords

References

  1. Alam, M. G. M., Tanaka, A., Stagnitti, F., Allinson, G., and T. Maekawa. 2001. Observations on the Effects of Caged Carp Culture on Water and Sediment Metal Concentrations in Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 48: 107-115.
  2. APHA (American Public Health Association), 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed., AWWAWPCF, Washington, DC.
  3. Chen, T. B., Zheng, Y. M., Lei, M., Huang, Z. C., Wu, H. T., Chen, H., Fan, K. K., Yu, K., Wu, X., and Q. Z. Tian. 2005. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Surface Soils of Urban Parks in Beijing, China. Chemosphere, 60(4): 542–551.
  4. Duque, W. O., Huguet, N. F., Domindo, J. L., and M. Schuhmacher. 2006. Assessing Water Quality in Rivers With Fuzzy Inference Systems: A Case Study. Environmental International, 32: 733742.
  5. Geldermann, J., Spengler, T., and O. Rentz. 2000. Fuzzy Outranking for Environmental Assessment. Case Study: Iron and Steel Making Industry. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115: 45–65. Icaga, Y. 2007. Fuzzy Evaluation of Water Quality Classification. Ecological Indicators, 7:710–718.
  6. Jain, C. K., Gupta, H., and G. J. Chakrapani. 2008. Enrichment and Fractionation of Heavy Metals in Bed Sediments of River Narmada, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 141:35–47.
  7. Lermontov, A., Ykoyama, L., Lermontov, M., Augusta, M., and S. Machado. 2009. River Quality Analysis Using Fuzzy Water Quality Index: Riberia do Iguape River Watershed, Brazil. Ecological Indicators, 9: 1188-1197.
  8. Liou, S. M., Lo, S. L., and C. Y. Hu. 2003. Application of Two-Stage Fuzzy Set Theory to River Quality Evaluation in Taiwan Source. Water Research, 37 (6): 1406–1416.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Olcay Hisar This is me
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Marine Science and Technology Faculty, Canakkale, Turkey

Adem Yavuz Sönmez This is me
Kastamonu University, Fisheries Faculty, Kastamonu, Turkey

Hasan Kaya This is me
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Marine Science and Technology Faculty, Canakkale, Turkey

Şükriye Aras Hisar This is me
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Marine Science and Technology Faculty, Canakkale, Turkey

Publication Date

December 20, 2012

Submission Date

July 11, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2012 Volume: 1 Number: 1

APA
Hisar, O., Sönmez, A. Y., Kaya, H., & Hisar, Ş. A. (2012). Various inference systems for classification of water quality status: A case study. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 1(1), 7-11. https://izlik.org/JA89LL66CJ
AMA
1.Hisar O, Sönmez AY, Kaya H, Hisar ŞA. Various inference systems for classification of water quality status: A case study. Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull. 2012;1(1):7-11. https://izlik.org/JA89LL66CJ
Chicago
Hisar, Olcay, Adem Yavuz Sönmez, Hasan Kaya, and Şükriye Aras Hisar. 2012. “Various Inference Systems for Classification of Water Quality Status: A Case Study”. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin 1 (1): 7-11. https://izlik.org/JA89LL66CJ.
EndNote
Hisar O, Sönmez AY, Kaya H, Hisar ŞA (December 1, 2012) Various inference systems for classification of water quality status: A case study. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin 1 1 7–11.
IEEE
[1]O. Hisar, A. Y. Sönmez, H. Kaya, and Ş. A. Hisar, “Various inference systems for classification of water quality status: A case study”, Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–11, Dec. 2012, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA89LL66CJ
ISNAD
Hisar, Olcay - Sönmez, Adem Yavuz - Kaya, Hasan - Hisar, Şükriye Aras. “Various Inference Systems for Classification of Water Quality Status: A Case Study”. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin 1/1 (December 1, 2012): 7-11. https://izlik.org/JA89LL66CJ.
JAMA
1.Hisar O, Sönmez AY, Kaya H, Hisar ŞA. Various inference systems for classification of water quality status: A case study. Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull. 2012;1:7–11.
MLA
Hisar, Olcay, et al. “Various Inference Systems for Classification of Water Quality Status: A Case Study”. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, vol. 1, no. 1, Dec. 2012, pp. 7-11, https://izlik.org/JA89LL66CJ.
Vancouver
1.Olcay Hisar, Adem Yavuz Sönmez, Hasan Kaya, Şükriye Aras Hisar. Various inference systems for classification of water quality status: A case study. Mar. Sci. Tech. Bull. [Internet]. 2012 Dec. 1;1(1):7-11. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA89LL66CJ

27116