Research Article

Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box

Volume: 5 Number: 2 August 30, 2024
EN TR

Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box

Abstract

Increasing population worldwide and the resulting increasing number of automobiles increase the risk of traffic accidents. Due to this increasing risk, automobile manufacturers take various safety measures to protect drivers and passengers in case of possible accidents. Crash boxes are one of the passive safety system elements that are the first to absorb the impact in the event of a front or rear impact accident, absorbing the resulting deformation energy and ensuring that it is transmitted into the car at the least possible level. Therefore, increasing the energy absorption ability of crash boxes is an extremely important issue. In this study, it was aimed to increase the energy absorption capabilities by placing aluminum foam based materials produced by using the powder metallurgy method using three different aluminum alloys (Al2024, Al5083, and Al6061) inside the crash boxes, which are normally manufactured as hollow. In addition, the produced aluminum foams were compared in terms of pore sizes with SEM images. It can be said that Al6061 is the most ideal material among the alloys used in terms of pore structure and homogeneity. On the other hand, Al6061 alloys produced the greatest damped energy value within the parameters of the investigation, 221.711 J. This value was 169.556 J for Al2024 alloy and 214.101 J for Al5083 alloy. As a result, it was concluded that the amount of energy absorption can be increased by about 4-5 times by using metallic foams produced using aluminum materials compared to the empty crash box.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Karabük University

Project Number

FYL-2020-2238

Thanks

This study was supported by Karabük University Scientific Research Project numbered FYL-2020-2238.

References

  1. 1. I. Kusyairi, H.M. Himawan, M.A. Choiron, Y.S. Irawan, Effects of origami pattern crash box and rectangular pattern crash box on the modelling of MPV car structure on deformation, Journal Of Energy, Mechanical, Material, And Manufacturing Engineering, 3(2): 61–68, 2018.
  2. 2. N.A.Z. Abdullah, M.S.M. Sani, M.S. Salwani, N.A. Husain, A review on crashworthiness studies of crash box structure, Thin-Walled Structures, 153: 106795, 2020.
  3. 3. N.N. Hussain, S.P. Regalla, Y.V.D. Rao, Comparative study of trigger configuration for enhancement of crashworthiness of automobile crash box subjected to axial ımpact loading, Procedia Engineering, 173: 1390–1398, 2017.
  4. 4. M.A. Choiron and M.A. Yaqin, Optimization of two segments crash box with rubber joint using response surface methodology, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2278 (1): 020012, 2020.
  5. 5. N.N. Hussain, S.P. Regalla, A. Jusuf, Drop-weight impact testing for the study of energy absorption in automobile crash boxes made of composite material, Proceedings Of The Institution Of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal Of Materials: Design And Applications, 235 (1): 114–130, 2020.
  6. 6. A. Pavlovic and C. Fragassa, Investigating the crash-box-structure’s ability to absorb energy, International Journal Of Crashworthiness, 2024.
  7. 7. Y. Hwang and J. Han, Energy absorption optimisation of an origami-shaped crash box under axial loading, International Journal Of Crashworthiness, 29 (1): 132–141, 2024.
  8. 8. F.A.F. Astuti, M.A. Choiron, A. Purnowidodo, Y.S. Irawan, Energy absorption and deformation pattern of honeycomb hybrid crash box under frontal load, AIP Conf. Proc., 3077 (1): 050041, 2024.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Automotive Engineering Materials

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

August 23, 2024

Publication Date

August 30, 2024

Submission Date

July 22, 2024

Acceptance Date

August 20, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Uslu, S., & Kocaoğlu, B. (2024). Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box. Manufacturing Technologies and Applications, 5(2), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.52795/mateca.1520669
AMA
1.Uslu S, Kocaoğlu B. Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box. MATECA. 2024;5(2):118-129. doi:10.52795/mateca.1520669
Chicago
Uslu, Samet, and Batuhan Kocaoğlu. 2024. “Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box”. Manufacturing Technologies and Applications 5 (2): 118-29. https://doi.org/10.52795/mateca.1520669.
EndNote
Uslu S, Kocaoğlu B (August 1, 2024) Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box. Manufacturing Technologies and Applications 5 2 118–129.
IEEE
[1]S. Uslu and B. Kocaoğlu, “Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box”, MATECA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 118–129, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.52795/mateca.1520669.
ISNAD
Uslu, Samet - Kocaoğlu, Batuhan. “Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box”. Manufacturing Technologies and Applications 5/2 (August 1, 2024): 118-129. https://doi.org/10.52795/mateca.1520669.
JAMA
1.Uslu S, Kocaoğlu B. Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box. MATECA. 2024;5:118–129.
MLA
Uslu, Samet, and Batuhan Kocaoğlu. “Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box”. Manufacturing Technologies and Applications, vol. 5, no. 2, Aug. 2024, pp. 118-29, doi:10.52795/mateca.1520669.
Vancouver
1.Samet Uslu, Batuhan Kocaoğlu. Comparison of Energy Absorptive Capacities of Different Aluminum Alloy Foams Placed Inside the Crash Box. MATECA. 2024 Aug. 1;5(2):118-29. doi:10.52795/mateca.1520669