Abstract
In this study, the stages of new product design were evaluated and the design process was tried to be revealed. Beginning with the introduction of the new product, the stages of defining the raw material properties and physical, mathematical and chemical properties of the product will be explained. It has been specified how the mobility of the product should be demonstrated, what the market research should cover, and how artistic and popular aspects of the product will be reflected. The analysis of the design process and how it should be assessed is briefly explained. The process of visual design has to be carried out and technical details are given. It also gives details about the pre - release process of the product.
Keywords
References
- Evren, R., Kahveci, R., 2005, Yeni Ürün Geliştirme, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi
- Dorothy Leonard-Barton, 1992, Core Capabılıtıes And Core Rıgıdıtıes: A Paradox In Managıng New Product Deve... Strategic Management Journal (1986-1998); 13, Specıal Issue; Abı/Inform Global Pg. 111
- Carlile P., R., 2002, A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 4 pp. 442-455 Trott P., Innovation Management and New Product Development, Portsmouth Business School, Financial Times Prentice Hall is an imprint of Pearson, Fifth Edition
- Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management science, 15(5), 215-227.
- Leonard, D. A. (2011). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. In Managing Knowledge Assets, Creativity And Innovation (pp. 11-27).
- Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Somethingold, something new: A longitudinal studyof search behavior and new productintroduction. Academy of managementjournal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
- Biegler, L. T., Grossmann, I. E., & Westerberg, A. W. (1997). Systematicmethods for chemical process design.
- Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: the design process demystified. Routledge.
- Ullman, D. G. (2002). The mechanical design process. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math.
- Curtis, B., Krasner, H., & Iscoe, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11), 1268-1287.
- Suh, N. P. (1990). The principles of design (No. 6). Oxford University Press on Demand.
- Parnas, D. L., & Clements, P. C. (1986). A rational design process: How and why to fake it. IEEE transactions on software engineering, (2), 251-257.
Abstract
Bu çalışmada, yeni ürün tasarımı aşamaları değerlendirilmiş ve tasarım süreci ortaya konmaya çalışılmıştır. Yeni ürüne kara verilmesi aşamasından başlanarak ürünün taşıyacağı hammadde özellikleri ile fiziksel, matematiksel ve kimyasal özelliklerin tanımlanması aşamaları anlatılmıştır. Ürünün taşıyacağı hareket kabiliyetlerinin nasıl gösterilmesi gerektiği, piyasa araştırmasının neleri kapsaması gerektiği ve ürüne ait sanatsal ve popüler yönlerin nasıl yansıtılacağı belirtilmiştir. Tasarım sürecinde yapılacak analizler ve bunların nasıl değerlendirilmesi gerektiği kısaca açıklanmıştır. Sürecin görsel tasarımının taşıması gerekli, teknik detayların neler olacağı ile ilgili bilgi verilmiştir. Ayrıca ürünün ortaya konması öncesi süreç hakkında ayrıntılar belirtilmiştir.
References
- Evren, R., Kahveci, R., 2005, Yeni Ürün Geliştirme, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi
- Dorothy Leonard-Barton, 1992, Core Capabılıtıes And Core Rıgıdıtıes: A Paradox In Managıng New Product Deve... Strategic Management Journal (1986-1998); 13, Specıal Issue; Abı/Inform Global Pg. 111
- Carlile P., R., 2002, A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 4 pp. 442-455 Trott P., Innovation Management and New Product Development, Portsmouth Business School, Financial Times Prentice Hall is an imprint of Pearson, Fifth Edition
- Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management science, 15(5), 215-227.
- Leonard, D. A. (2011). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. In Managing Knowledge Assets, Creativity And Innovation (pp. 11-27).
- Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Somethingold, something new: A longitudinal studyof search behavior and new productintroduction. Academy of managementjournal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
- Biegler, L. T., Grossmann, I. E., & Westerberg, A. W. (1997). Systematicmethods for chemical process design.
- Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: the design process demystified. Routledge.
- Ullman, D. G. (2002). The mechanical design process. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math.
- Curtis, B., Krasner, H., & Iscoe, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11), 1268-1287.
- Suh, N. P. (1990). The principles of design (No. 6). Oxford University Press on Demand.
- Parnas, D. L., & Clements, P. C. (1986). A rational design process: How and why to fake it. IEEE transactions on software engineering, (2), 251-257.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | September 1, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 6 Issue: 2 |