Research Article

BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI

Volume: 20 Number: 1 June 8, 2018

BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI

Abstract

Finansal tablo kullanıcıları, denetçi raporunun daha fazla bilgi içermesini, özellikle denetçilerin yaptıkları denetim sonucunda kullanıcılara daha fazla yararlı bilgi vermelerini istemişlerdir. Daha fazla bilgi içeren rapor taleplerine karşılık, Uluslararası Denetim ve Güvence Standartları Kurulu (IAASB), denetçi raporunun iletişim değerini artırmak amacıyla yeni denetim raporlaması projesi kapsamında yeni ISA 701 “Kilit Denetim Konularının Bağımsız Denetçi Raporunda Bildirilmesi” standardını yayımlamıştır. Daha sonra Kamu Gözetimi Kurumu (KGK) söz konusu standardın kabul sürecini başlatmış ve sonunda ISA 701 ile uyumlu BDS 701’i 2017 yılında yayımlamıştır. Yeni denetim standardı denetçinin Kilit Denetim Konularını (KDK) belirlemesini ve bu konuları açıklayarak denetçi raporunda bildirmesini zorunlu kılmaktadır.

Bu çalışmanın amacı, cari döneme ait finansal tabloların denetiminde, denetçinin meslekî muhakemesine göre en çok önem arz eden konular olarak tanımlanan KDK’yı ve yeni denetim standardı ISA/BDS 701’e uygun olarak KDK’nın nasıl belirleneceğini ve bağımsız denetçi raporunda nasıl bildirileceğini incelemek ve açıklamaktır.

Keywords

References

  1. Cordoş, G.S. ve Fülöp, M.T. 2015. “Understanding audit reporting changes: introduction of Key Audit Matters”, Accounting and Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 1, s.128-152. Doğan, A. 2016. “AB Denetim Reformu”, Muhasebe ve Denetim Dünyası, Sayı:2, Temmuz & Eylül s.1-18. Doğan, A. 2017. “Yeni Denetim Raporlaması”, Muhasebe ve Denetim Dünyası, Sayı:4, Ocak & Mart s.1-20. Emami, T. ve M. Motahary, H. 2016. “Key audit matters - the answer? An exploratory study investigating auditors’ possibility to accomplish the purpose of the new audit report”, Master’s Thesis, Uppsala University. FRC (Financial Reporting Council). 2015.Extended auditor’s reports: A review of experience in the first year, March. FRC (Financial Reporting Council). 2016. Extended auditor’s reports: A further review of experience, January. FRC (Financial Reporting Council). 2013. International Standard on Auditing (UK and Ireland) 700 (Revised), June. Gimbar, C. ve Ozlanski, M.E. 2016. “Early Evidence on the Effects of Critical Audit Matters on Auditor Liability”, Current Issues in Auditing Vol. 10, No. 1, s. A24–A33, American Accounting Association, Spring. IAASB (International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board). 2015a. At a Glance: New and Revised Auditor Reporting Standards and Related Conforming Amendments, January. IAASB (International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board). 2011. Consultation Paper: Enhancing the Value of Auditor Reporting: Exploring Options for Change, May. IAASB (International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board). 2013. Exposure Draft: Reporting on Audited Financial Statements - Proposed New and Revised International Standards on Auditing (ISAs), July. IAASB (International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board). 2015b. Final Pronouncements: Reporting on Audited Financial Statements – New and Revised Auditor Reporting Standards and Related Conforming Amendments, January. IAASB (International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board). 2016a. Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements, 2016–2017 Edition, Volume I, IFAC, December. IAASB (International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board). 2012. Invitation to Comment: Improving the Auditor’s Report, June. IAASB Auditor Reporting Implementation Working Group. 2015c. Auditor Reporting – Key Audit Matters, January 30. IAASB Auditor Reporting Implementation Working Group. 2015d. Auditor Reporting – Illustrative Key Audit Matters, January 30. IAASB Auditor Reporting Implementation Working Group. 2016b.The New Auditor’s Report: A Comparison between the ISAs and the US PCAOB Reproposal, May. IAASB (International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board). 2016c. Determining and Communicating Key Audit Matters (“KAM”), June Kachelmeier, S.J., Schmidt, J.J. ve Valentine, K. 2014. The Disclaimer Effect of Disclosing Critical Audit Matters in the Auditor’s Report, September. Kastein, P. ve Siddiqui, S. White Paper on the Auditor’s Reports of Certain UK Companies that Comply with International Auditing Standard (UK and Ireland) 700 (Revised June 2013), https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/white-paper-on-the-auditor-reports-of-certain-UK-Companies-that-Comply-with-International-auditing-standard.pdf , (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2017) KGK, BDS 701 Kilit Denetim Konularının Bağımsız Denetçi Raporunda Bildirilmesi, Resmi Gazete, 09.03.2017/30002. PCAOB. 2011. Concept Release on Possible Revisions to PCAOB Standards Related to Reports on Audited Financial Statements and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards, Release No. 2011-003, PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 34, June 21. PCAOB. 2016. Proposed Auditing Standard - The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards, Release No. 2016-003, Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034, May 11. PCAOB. 2017. The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards, Release No. 2017-001, Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034, June 1. Sirois, L.P., Bédard, J. ve Bera, P. 2014. The Informational Value of Key Audit Matters in the Auditor’s Report: Evidence from an Eye-tracking Study, May 26.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Aziz Doğan
Kamu Gözetimi Muhasebe ve Denetim Standartları Kurumu
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 8, 2018

Submission Date

November 17, 2017

Acceptance Date

April 5, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 20 Number: 1

APA
Doğan, A. (2018). BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 20(1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.355378
AMA
1.Doğan A. BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI. MODAV-MBDD. 2018;20(1):65-89. doi:10.31460/mbdd.355378
Chicago
Doğan, Aziz. 2018. “BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 20 (1): 65-89. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.355378.
EndNote
Doğan A (March 1, 2018) BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 20 1 65–89.
IEEE
[1]A. Doğan, “BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI”, MODAV-MBDD, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–89, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.31460/mbdd.355378.
ISNAD
Doğan, Aziz. “BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 20/1 (March 1, 2018): 65-89. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.355378.
JAMA
1.Doğan A. BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI. MODAV-MBDD. 2018;20:65–89.
MLA
Doğan, Aziz. “BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 1, Mar. 2018, pp. 65-89, doi:10.31460/mbdd.355378.
Vancouver
1.Aziz Doğan. BAĞIMSIZ DENETİMDE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: KİLİT DENETİM KONULARI. MODAV-MBDD. 2018 Mar. 1;20(1):65-89. doi:10.31460/mbdd.355378

Cited By

Bankalarda Kilit Denetim Konuları ve Hisse Değerine Etkisi

Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.54558/jiss.1407761

Authorship 
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research. 

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.