Conference Paper

KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Volume: 20 Number: 2 June 22, 2018

KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Abstract

This study aims to reveal integrated reporting situation in the world. For this purpose, the study has been done by using content analysis aimed at all reports which are recorded in integrated reporting examples database on August 2017. While the reports examine, organization profile and general features of integrated reports were identified as two main criteria in the study. According to the data were obtained from the database, total of 256 integrated reports were published by 150 organizations in the world between the years 2011 to 2016. In most of the reports in the database, information about guidelines principles and content elements that identified in the international integrated reporting framework determined as stated in the annual reports of organization. Corporate reports that published namely as integrated annual reports have been found to be most in South Africa. Mainly integrated reports were prepared by organizations which operate in the financial services sectors.


Keywords

References

  1. Eccles, R. G. and M. P. Krzus. 2010. One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  2. Entegre Raporlama Türkiye (ERTA). 2017. IR Network. http://www.entegreraporlamatr.org/tr/hakkimizda/biz-kimiz.aspx (accessed 10.06.2017).
  3. Ernst & Young (EY). 2014. Integrated Reporting: Elevating Value. http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-Integrated-reporting/$FILE/EY-Integrated-reporting.pdf (accessed 05.08.2017).
  4. Integrated Reporting Examples Database (IR Database). 2017a. Getting Started, Recognized Reports. http://examples.integratedreporting.org/getting_started (accessed 15.08.2017).
  5. Integrated Reporting Examples Database (IR Database). 2017b. Recognized Reports. http://examples.integratedreporting.org/recognized_reports (accessed 17.08.2017).
  6. The Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (IoDSA). 2009. King Report on Governance for South Africa. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iodsa.co.za/resource/resmgr/king_iii/King_Report_on_Governance_fo.pdf (accessed 12.07.2017).
  7. The Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (IoDSA). 2017. http://www.iodsa.co.za/?page=KingIII (accessed 14.07.2017).
  8. The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). 2013a. International Integrated Reporting Framework. http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf (accessed 12.06.2017).

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Conference Paper

Publication Date

June 22, 2018

Submission Date

January 5, 2018

Acceptance Date

June 21, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 20 Number: 2

APA
Kardeş Selimoğlu, S., & Yeşilçelebi, G. (2018). KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 20(2), 316-329. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.375304
AMA
1.Kardeş Selimoğlu S, Yeşilçelebi G. KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ. MODAV-MBDD. 2018;20(2):316-329. doi:10.31460/mbdd.375304
Chicago
Kardeş Selimoğlu, Seval, and Gül Yeşilçelebi. 2018. “KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 20 (2): 316-29. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.375304.
EndNote
Kardeş Selimoğlu S, Yeşilçelebi G (June 1, 2018) KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 20 2 316–329.
IEEE
[1]S. Kardeş Selimoğlu and G. Yeşilçelebi, “KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ”, MODAV-MBDD, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 316–329, June 2018, doi: 10.31460/mbdd.375304.
ISNAD
Kardeş Selimoğlu, Seval - Yeşilçelebi, Gül. “KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 20/2 (June 1, 2018): 316-329. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.375304.
JAMA
1.Kardeş Selimoğlu S, Yeşilçelebi G. KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ. MODAV-MBDD. 2018;20:316–329.
MLA
Kardeş Selimoğlu, Seval, and Gül Yeşilçelebi. “KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 2, June 2018, pp. 316-29, doi:10.31460/mbdd.375304.
Vancouver
1.Seval Kardeş Selimoğlu, Gül Yeşilçelebi. KÜRESEL KURULUŞLARIN ENTEGRE RAPORLAMASI: ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ÖRNEKLERİ VERİTABANINDA 2011-2016 YILLARI ARASINDA YAYINLANAN RAPORLARIN İÇERİK ANALİZİ. MODAV-MBDD. 2018 Jun. 1;20(2):316-29. doi:10.31460/mbdd.375304

Cited By

Authorship 
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research. 

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.