Research Article

THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES

Volume: 20 December 27, 2018
TR EN

THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES

Abstract

Externalities are the main source of most of the conflicts between businesses and public. There are several ways to address the externalities problems in economic literature such as; property rights, contractual arrangements and government regulation. Integrated reporting could improve the proposed solutions to externalities in economic literature by providing case specific information and consistent metrics for measurement. This paper views integrated reporting as a tool to overcome the externalities problems by reviewing theoretical background, pointing out issues regarding integrated reporting and providing directions for future research.

Keywords

References

  1. ACCA - The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. 2015. The Challenges of Assuring Integrated Reports: Views from the South African Auditing Community. https:// www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/ACCA_Global/Technical/integrate/ea-south-africa-IRassurance.pdf
  2. Baron, D. P. 2009. “A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18 (1), 7-43.
  3. Brown, J., J. Dillard. 2014. “Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27 (7), 1120-1156.
  4. Browning, E.K., M. A. Zupan. 2014. “Microeconomics: Theory and Applications”, 12th Edition, Wiley.
  5. Carroll, A. 1991. “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders”, Business Horizons, 34, 39–48
  6. Carroll, A. B., K. M. Shabana. 2010. “The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice”, International journal of management reviews, 12 (1), 85-105.
  7. Churet, Cecile, RobecoSAM, and Robert G. Eccles. 2014. “Integrated Reporting, Quality of Management, and Financial Performance”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Volume 26 Number 1, 8-16.
  8. Coase, Ronald H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (October), 1-44.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Çağnur Kaytmaz Balsarı This is me

Publication Date

December 27, 2018

Submission Date

June 15, 2018

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 20

APA
Sigalı, S., & Kaytmaz Balsarı, Ç. (2018). THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 20, 859-869. https://izlik.org/JA77JM33FF
AMA
1.Sigalı S, Kaytmaz Balsarı Ç. THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES. MODAV-MBDD. 2018;20:859-869. https://izlik.org/JA77JM33FF
Chicago
Sigalı, Seçil, and Çağnur Kaytmaz Balsarı. 2018. “THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 20 (December): 859-69. https://izlik.org/JA77JM33FF.
EndNote
Sigalı S, Kaytmaz Balsarı Ç (December 1, 2018) THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 20 859–869.
IEEE
[1]S. Sigalı and Ç. Kaytmaz Balsarı, “THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES”, MODAV-MBDD, vol. 20, pp. 859–869, Dec. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA77JM33FF
ISNAD
Sigalı, Seçil - Kaytmaz Balsarı, Çağnur. “THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 20 (December 1, 2018): 859-869. https://izlik.org/JA77JM33FF.
JAMA
1.Sigalı S, Kaytmaz Balsarı Ç. THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES. MODAV-MBDD. 2018;20:859–869.
MLA
Sigalı, Seçil, and Çağnur Kaytmaz Balsarı. “THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, vol. 20, Dec. 2018, pp. 859-6, https://izlik.org/JA77JM33FF.
Vancouver
1.Seçil Sigalı, Çağnur Kaytmaz Balsarı. THEORETICAL INSIGHTS ON INTEGRATED REPORTING AND EXTERNALITIES. MODAV-MBDD [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 1;20:859-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA77JM33FF

Authorship 
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research. 

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.