Research Article

A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES

Volume: 22 February 25, 2020
TR EN

A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES

Abstract

Online homework managers allow instructor to assign and collect homework online; the systems then grade the homework and enter the grades into the instructor’s grade book automatically. This paper addresses the question whether the use of OHMs in accounting courses affects student learning and satisfaction. The regression results provide some evidence that students doing online homework regularly scored significantly higher on final exams. In addition, with the adaptation of the OHMs, students were found to be more satisfied with the course. These findings show that the use of OHMs can help students learn accounting concepts better. Our results are likely to be of interest to many accounting faculty members who continue to use traditional teaching methods.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Pearson

References

  1. Arora, M.L., Rho, Y.J. Masson, C. (2013). Longitudinal Study of Online Statics Homework as a Method to Improve Learning. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research; 14(1), 36-44.
  2. Bangert-Drowns, R., Kulik, C., Kulik, J., Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events, Review of Educational Research, 61-2, 213-238.
  3. Burch, K. J. & Kuo, Y. (2010). Traditional vs. Online Homework in College Algebra, Mathematics and Computer Education, Vol. 44-1, 53-63.
  4. Cheng, K. K., Thacker, B., Cardenas, R. L., & Crouch. (2004). Using an online homework system enhances students’ learning of physics concepts in an introductory physics course, American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1447-1453.
  5. Gaffney, Marry Anne; Ryan, David; Wurst, Christian. (2010). Do Online Homework Systems Improve Student Performance? Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, 11, 49-68.
  6. Kulik J, Kulik C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning, Review of Educational Research, 58, 79-97.
  7. Lindquist, T, Olsen, L.M. (2007). How much help is too much help? An experimental investigation of the use of check figures and completed solutions in teaching intermediate accounting, Journal of Accounting Education, 25, 103-117.
  8. Lusher, L. A, Huber, M.M, Valencia, J.M. (2012). Empirical Evidence Regarding the Relationship between the Computerized Classromm and Student Performance in Introductory Accounting, The Accounting Educator’s Journal, 1-23

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Daniel Furr This is me
United States

Publication Date

February 25, 2020

Submission Date

November 12, 2019

Acceptance Date

January 17, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 22

APA
Türel, A., & Furr, D. (2020). A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 22, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.645762
AMA
1.Türel A, Furr D. A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES. MODAV-MBDD. 2020;22:130-141. doi:10.31460/mbdd.645762
Chicago
Türel, Ahmet, and Daniel Furr. 2020. “A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 22 (February): 130-41. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.645762.
EndNote
Türel A, Furr D (February 1, 2020) A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 22 130–141.
IEEE
[1]A. Türel and D. Furr, “A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES”, MODAV-MBDD, vol. 22, pp. 130–141, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.31460/mbdd.645762.
ISNAD
Türel, Ahmet - Furr, Daniel. “A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 22 (February 1, 2020): 130-141. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.645762.
JAMA
1.Türel A, Furr D. A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES. MODAV-MBDD. 2020;22:130–141.
MLA
Türel, Ahmet, and Daniel Furr. “A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, vol. 22, Feb. 2020, pp. 130-41, doi:10.31460/mbdd.645762.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Türel, Daniel Furr. A STUDY OF ONLINE HOMEWORK MANAGERS ON STUDENT LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN ACCOUNTING COURSES. MODAV-MBDD. 2020 Feb. 1;22:130-41. doi:10.31460/mbdd.645762

Authorship 
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research. 

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.