Research Article

CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX

Volume: 23 Number: 1 March 31, 2021
TR EN

CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX

Abstract

This study examined the link between the membership of the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index (BIST SI) and corporate social performance proxied by the overall environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores. Based on this purpose, panel data methods were used to analyze the data of the listed firms in Borsa Istanbul for the years between 2014 – 2018. The main results suggest that compared to their counterparts, the firms included in the BIST SI have higher performance in ESG issues even when controlling for the firm size, financial risk, profitability, and capital expenditures.

Keywords

References

  1. Ararat, M. and Süel, E. 2014. Promoting Sustainable Development: The Way Forward for a Sustainability Index in Turkey, Sabancı University Corporate Governance Forum of Turkey. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/565a/05640fe00b8cb50d97f06e6a303dc896b405.pdf (Retrieved on 21.05.2020).
  2. Avetisyan, E. and Hockerts, K. 2017. “The Consolidation of The ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 316-330.
  3. Baltagi, B.H. 2005. Econometric Analysis of Data Panel. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  4. Chatterji, A.K., Durand, R., Levine, D.I. and Touboul, S. 2016. “Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Managers, Investors and Strategy Researchers”, Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597-1614.
  5. Dorfleitner, G., Halbritter,G. and Nguyen, M. 2015. “Measuring the Level and Risk of Corporate Responsibility–An Empirical Comparison of Different ESG Rating Approaches”, Journal of Asset Management, 16(7), 450-466.
  6. Drempetic, S., Klein, C. and Zwergel, B. 2019. “The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review”, Journal of Business Ethics, 1-28.
  7. Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M.A., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J.M. and Muñoz-Torres, M.J. 2019. “Rating the Raters: Evaluating How ESG Rating Agencies Integrate Sustainability Principles”, Sustainability, 11(3), 915.
  8. Escrig-Olmedo, E., Muñoz-Torres, M.J. and Fernandez-Izquierdo, M.A. 2010. “Socially Responsible Investing: Sustainability Indices, ESG Rating and Information Provider Agencies”, International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 2(4), 442-461.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 31, 2021

Submission Date

May 28, 2020

Acceptance Date

December 1, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 23 Number: 1

APA
Ateş, S. (2021). CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 23(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.744584
AMA
1.Ateş S. CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX. MODAV-MBDD. 2021;23(1):48-60. doi:10.31460/mbdd.744584
Chicago
Ateş, Sinem. 2021. “CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 23 (1): 48-60. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.744584.
EndNote
Ateş S (March 1, 2021) CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 23 1 48–60.
IEEE
[1]S. Ateş, “CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX”, MODAV-MBDD, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 48–60, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.31460/mbdd.744584.
ISNAD
Ateş, Sinem. “CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 23/1 (March 1, 2021): 48-60. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.744584.
JAMA
1.Ateş S. CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX. MODAV-MBDD. 2021;23:48–60.
MLA
Ateş, Sinem. “CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, vol. 23, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pp. 48-60, doi:10.31460/mbdd.744584.
Vancouver
1.Sinem Ateş. CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE SCORES OF THE FIRMS IN SUSTAINABILITY INDEX. MODAV-MBDD. 2021 Mar. 1;23(1):48-60. doi:10.31460/mbdd.744584

Authorship 
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research. 

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.