THE CONSENSUS AMONG US GAAP AND IFRS HAVING STEMMED FROM PRESSURE OF THE U.S. SOFTWARE INDUSTRY: “APPLE RULES”
Abstract
In the last ten years, software companies enter into more complex service offerings, so-called ―“multiple deliverables”. This study describes how Apple Inc. found itself in the center of subscription accounting rules in US GAAP causing an understatement of its iPhone earnings by $3.8 billion in 2008 and then primarily took the leading role in pushing Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for a need of standard change in that particular industry, started in 2008 and finalized in 2014. On September 23, 2009, the industry gained its first victory against Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP) with the issuance of new rules; Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 08-1, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (EITF 08-1) and then penetrated the whole industry in the world with a converged standard; namely “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (IFRS 15) which was issued jointly by FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on May 28, 2014 superseding all FASB’s and IASB’s rules.
References
- Blodget, H. 2009. “iPhone Accounting Change Could Send Apple Profits And Stock To Moon”, www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-new-apple-iphone-accounting-change-could-send-profits-and-stock-to-moon-2009-9 (Access Date: 20.02.2016).
- Bowen, R. and Kennedy, J. 2010. “The iPhone Revenue Bomb”, http://faculty.washington.edu/rbowen/cases/Apple%20Revenue%20Rec%20Strategy%20(B)_10-10.pdf (Access Date: 18.03.2016).
- Brochet, F., Palepu, K. and Barley, L. 2013. “Accounting for the iPhone at Apple Inc.”, www.hbs.com (Access Date: 18.02.2016).
- DeWitt, P. 2009. “Spotlight on Apple’s Hidden Revenue Stream”, http://fortune.com/2009/01/20/spotlight-on-apples-hidden-revenue-stream/ (Access Date: 18.03.2016).
- Dilger, D. 2009. “Inside Apple’s iPhone Subscription Accounting Changes”, http://appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/21/inside_apples_iphone_subscription_accounting_changes (Access Date: 18.03.2016).
- FASB, 2008. “EITF 08-01: Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”.
- FASB, 2008. “EITF 00-21: Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”.
- IASB, 2014. “IFRS 15: Revenue from Contracts with Customers” http://www.iasplus.com (Access Date: 24.03.2016).
- KPMG, 2009. “Implementing the New EITF Consensuses on Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements”, https://www.kpmg.com/Ca/en/topics/Quarterly-Update/Documents/fn_iid09-03.pdf (Access Date: 18.02.2016).
- Leone, M. 2009. "New Revenue-Recognition Rules: The Apple of Apple’s Eye?" http://ww2.cfo.com/accounting-tax/2009/09/new-revenue-recognition-rules-the-apple-of-apples-eye/ (Access Date: 18.02.2016).
- PWC, 2015. “IFRS and US GAAP: Similarities and Differences”, http://www.pwc.com (Access Date: 24.03.2016).
- SOP 97-2: Software Revenue Recognition, 1997.
- www.apple.com
- www.fasb.org
- www.forbes.com
- www.inc.com
- www.samsung.com
- www.bpmcpa.com
ABD YAZILIM ENDÜSTRİSİNDEN MUHASEBE DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ İÇİN GELEN BASKI KAYNAKLI US GAAP ve UFRS UZLAŞMASI: “APPLE KURALLARI”
Abstract
Yazılım şirketleri, özellikle son on yılda, “çoklu eylem içeren sözleşmeler” niteliğindeki daha karmaşık hizmet sunumuna girmiştir. Bu çalışmada, finansal tablolarını Amerikan Genel Kabul Görmüş Muhasebe İlkeleri’ne (US GAAP) göre hazırlayan Apple Şirketi’nin abonelik muhasebesi kurallarına uyum nedeniyle 2008 yılında gerçekleştirdiği iPhone satışlarına ilişkin hasılat tutarını 3,8 milyar dolar az göstermek zorunda kaldığı ve bu nedenle ABD Finansal Muhasebe Standartları Kurulu'nun bir standart değişikliğine gitmesinde piyasada üstlendiği öncü rolü anlatılmıştır. 23 Eylül 2009’da, hızla büyüyen bu endüstri, ilk önce Gündeme Gelen Çalışma Grubu’nun (Emerging Issues Task Force-EITF) yayınladığı EITF 08-1 “Çoklu Eylem İçeren Sözleşmelere İlişkin Hasılat” ile US GAAP’in gerçeği yansıtmayan eski uygulamasına karşı ilk zaferini kazanmış ve daha sonra uzun süren çalışmalar neticesinde, 28 Mayıs 2014’te ABD Finansal Muhasebe Standartları Kurulu ve Uluslararası Muhasebe Standartları Kurulu (UMSK) tarafından ortak UFRS 15 “ Müşterilerle Yapılan Sözleşmelerden Doğan Hasılat” Standardı yayınlanmıştır.
References
- Blodget, H. 2009. “iPhone Accounting Change Could Send Apple Profits And Stock To Moon”, www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-new-apple-iphone-accounting-change-could-send-profits-and-stock-to-moon-2009-9 (Access Date: 20.02.2016).
- Bowen, R. and Kennedy, J. 2010. “The iPhone Revenue Bomb”, http://faculty.washington.edu/rbowen/cases/Apple%20Revenue%20Rec%20Strategy%20(B)_10-10.pdf (Access Date: 18.03.2016).
- Brochet, F., Palepu, K. and Barley, L. 2013. “Accounting for the iPhone at Apple Inc.”, www.hbs.com (Access Date: 18.02.2016).
- DeWitt, P. 2009. “Spotlight on Apple’s Hidden Revenue Stream”, http://fortune.com/2009/01/20/spotlight-on-apples-hidden-revenue-stream/ (Access Date: 18.03.2016).
- Dilger, D. 2009. “Inside Apple’s iPhone Subscription Accounting Changes”, http://appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/21/inside_apples_iphone_subscription_accounting_changes (Access Date: 18.03.2016).
- FASB, 2008. “EITF 08-01: Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”.
- FASB, 2008. “EITF 00-21: Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”.
- IASB, 2014. “IFRS 15: Revenue from Contracts with Customers” http://www.iasplus.com (Access Date: 24.03.2016).
- KPMG, 2009. “Implementing the New EITF Consensuses on Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements”, https://www.kpmg.com/Ca/en/topics/Quarterly-Update/Documents/fn_iid09-03.pdf (Access Date: 18.02.2016).
- Leone, M. 2009. "New Revenue-Recognition Rules: The Apple of Apple’s Eye?" http://ww2.cfo.com/accounting-tax/2009/09/new-revenue-recognition-rules-the-apple-of-apples-eye/ (Access Date: 18.02.2016).
- PWC, 2015. “IFRS and US GAAP: Similarities and Differences”, http://www.pwc.com (Access Date: 24.03.2016).
- SOP 97-2: Software Revenue Recognition, 1997.
- www.apple.com
- www.fasb.org
- www.forbes.com
- www.inc.com
- www.samsung.com
- www.bpmcpa.com
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Business Administration |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | January 20, 2017 |
| Publication Date | March 30, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 19 Issue: 1 |
Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.
For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.
The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.