Retrospective Evaluation of the Results of Elastic Intramedullary Nailing in Pediatric Femoral, Tibial, and Forearm Diaphyseal Fractures
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of pediatric femur, tibia, and diaphyseal fractures treated with elastic intramedullary nails.
Method: Overall 50 patients (34 male and 16 females; mean age: 7.7 years; range 5–14 years) diagnosed with femur, tibia, and forearm diaphyseal fractures were treated with titanium elastic nails (TEN). Of these, 18 were femur, 16 were tibia, and 16 were forearm diaphyseal fractures. One femoral shaft fracture was fragmented, and one tibia fracture was an open fracture. Open reduction was performed in two patients, whereas closed reduction was performed in the other patients. Anteroposterior (AP) and Lateral radiographies were used in the follow-up of patients. The patients were evaluated according to the range of motion, ability to use extremities, hospitalization duration, union duration of the fractures, inequality that may occur in the extremities, and development of complications. Flynn scoring system was used for evaluating the cases.
Results: Union of the fractures was achieved in an average of 6.9 (range: 4–11) weeks.A patient had a tibia fracture in the front-back plane AP with 5 varus angulation, 10 posterior angulation with a forearm fracture in the lateral plane, and 2.5 mm shortness was observed in an another forearm fracture. All patients, except one, had normal range of motion and could comfortably use the extremities. No nonunion, epiphysial growth arrest, and infection was observed in any patient. According to the Flynn criteria; perfect results were achieved in 34 patients and successful results were achieved in 16. Average union duration was 9.6 (range: 5–14) weeks, hospitalization duration was 3.5 (range: 3–6) days, and follow-up duration was 12.4 (range: 6–19) months.
Conclusions: Titanium intramedullary elastic nail is a treatment method that can be successfully performed on pediatric femur, tibia, and forearm diaphyseal fractures.
Keywords
Titanium intramedullary elastic nail, pediatric femur diaphysis fracture, pediatric tibia diaphysis fracture, pediatric forearm diaphysis fracture, surgery
References
- Aktekin CN, Bicimoglu A. Intramedullary nailing in pediatric fractures. Totbid Dergisi 2007; 6(3-4): 102-8.
- Aktekin CN, Ozturk AM, Altay M, Toprak A, Ozkurt B, Tabak AY. Flexible intramedullary nailing of children. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 2007; 13: 115-21.
- Barry M, Paterson JM. A flexible intramedullary nail forfractures in children. J Bone JointSurgBr 2004; 86(7): 947-53.
- Bilge O, Aksoy CM. Fractures of tibia in children Totbid dergisi 2008; 7(3-4): 121-6.
- Debnath S, Debbarma S, Sarkar A. Titanium elastic nailing osteosynthesis for diaphyseal tibial fracture in pediatrıc age group-our experience. Indian J. Appl. Res 2017; 7: 52–53. Flynn JM, Hresko T, Reynolds RA, et al. Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: A multicenter study of early results with analysis of complications. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21: 4–8.
- Fuller DJ, McCullough CJ. Malunited fractures of the forearm in children. J Bone JointSurg (Br). 1982; 64: 364–7.
- Gogi N, Khan SA, Varshney MK. Limb lenght discrepancy following titanium elastic nailing pediatric femoral shaft fractures. ActaOrthopBelg 2006; 72: 154-8.
- Gordon JE, Gregush RV, Schoenecker PL, Dobbs MB, Luhmann SJ. Complications after titanium elastic nailing of pediatric tibial fractures J Pediatr Orthop 2007; 27(4): 442-6.
- Govindasamy R, Gnanasundaram R, Kasirajan S, Ibrahim S, Melepuram JJ. ElasticStableIntramedullaryNailing of FemoralShaftFracture-Experience in 48 Children. Arch Bone JtSurg. 2018;6(1):39–46.
- Heinrich SD, Drvaric D, Darr K, MacEwen GD. Stabilization of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures with flexible intramedullary nails (a techniquepaper). J OrthopTrauma 1992; 6(4): 452-9.