Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 385 - 389, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.19127/mbsjohs.803373

Abstract

Supporting Institution

yok

Project Number

yok

Thanks

yok

References

  • Are C, Stoddard HA, Northam LC, Thompson JS, Todd GL. An experience in surgical anatomy to provide first-year medical students with an early exposure to general surgery: a pilot study. Journal of surgical education 2009; 66(4): 186-189.
  • Bahsi I, Topal Z, Cetkin M, Orhan M, Kervancioglu P, Odabasioglu ME, Cihan OF. Evaluation of attitudes and opinions of medical faculty students against the use of cadaver in anatomy education and investigation of the factors affecting their emotional responses related thereto. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2020: 1-7.
  • Bahsi I, Cetkin, M, Orhan M, Kervancioglu P, Sayin S, Ayan H. Evaluation of attention-motivation level, studying environment and methods of medical faculty students. European Journal of Therapeutics 2017; 23(1): 1-7.
  • Biasutto, SN, Caussa LI, Río LEC. Teaching anatomy: cadavers vs. computers? Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 2006; 188(2): 187-190.
  • Cetkin M, Turhan B, Bahsi I, Kervancioglu P. The opinions of medicine faculty students about anatomy education. European Journal of Therapeutıcs 2016; 22: 82-88.
  • Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 2016; 208: 151-157. Fitzpatrick CM, Kolesari GL, Brasel KJ. Teaching anatomy with surgeons' tools: Use of the laparoscope in clinical anatomy. Clinical Anatomy: The Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists 2001; 14(5): 349-353.
  • Heisler CA. Importance of adequate gross anatomy education: the impact of a structured pelvic anatomy course during gynecology fellowship. Anatomical sciences education 2011; 4(5): 302-304.
  • Hoyek N, Collet C, Di Rienzo F, De Almeida M, Guillot A. Effectiveness of three‐dimensional digital animation in teaching human anatomy in an authentic classroom context. Anatomical sciences education 2014;7(6):430-437.
  • Gozil R, Ozkan S, Bahcelioglu M, Kadıoglu D, Calguner E, Öktem H, Babus T. Gazi Universitesi Tıp Fakultesi 2. Sınıf Ögrencilerinin Anatomi Egitimini Degerlendirmeleri. Tıp Egitimi Dunyası 2006; 23(23): 27-32.
  • Gunderman RB, Wilson PK. Exploring the human interior: The roles of cadaver dissection and radiologic imaging in teaching anatomy. Academic Medicine 2005;80(8):745-749.
  • Kagan I I. Traditions and peculiarities of clinical anatomy education in Russia. Clinical Anatomy: The Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists 2002; 15(2): 152-156.
  • Lewis TL, Burnett B, Tunstall RG, Abrahams PH. Complementing anatomy education using three‐dimensional anatomy mobile software applications on tablet computers. Clinical Anatomy 2014; 27(3):313-320.
  • McLachlan JC, Bligh, J, Bradley P, Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Medical education 2004; 38(4): 418-424.
  • Morgan H, Zeller J, Hughes DT, Dooley-Hash S, Klein K, Caty R, Santen S. Applied clinical anatomy: the successful integration of anatomy into specialty-specific senior electives. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2017;39(1): 95-101.
  • Murgitroyd E, Madurska M, Gonzalez J,Watson A. 3D digital anatomy modelling–Practical or pretty? The Surgeon 2015; 13(3):177-180.
  • Orsbon CP, Kaiser RS, Ross CF. Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: A case for medical imaging and vertical integration. Anatomical sciences education 2014;7(4): 251-261.
  • Older J. Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. The Surgeon 2004; 2(2): 79-90.
  • Ozcan S, Huri E, Tatar I, Sargon M, Karakan T, Yagli OF, Larre S. Impact of cadaveric surgical anatomy training on urology resident’s knowledge: a preliminary study. Turkish journal of urology 2015; 41(2):83.
  • Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB. Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when? The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists 2006; 289(6): 215-218.
  • Singh R, Tubbs RS, Gupta K, Singh M, Jones DG, Kumar R. Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education/profession?—A review. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2015; 37(10): 1257-1265.
  • Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anatomical sciences education 2010; 3(2): 83-93.
  • Sure U, Benes L, Bozinov O, Woydt M, Tirakotai W, Bertalanffy H. Intraoperative landmarking of vascular anatomy by integration of duplex and Doppler ultrasonography in image-guided surgery. Technical note. Surgical neurology 2005;63(2): 133-142.
  • Zumwalt AC, Lufler RS, Monteiro J, Shaffer K. Building the body: Active learning laboratories that emphasize practical aspects of anatomy and integration with radiology. Anatomical sciences education 2010;3(3): 134-140.

Student Opinions on the Importance and Detail of the Accumulation of Anatomy Knowledge Integrating General Surgery

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 385 - 389, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.19127/mbsjohs.803373

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to create an original study that guides the anatomy and surgical branches and supports education within the framework of their opinions by raising awareness on this issue in medical faculty students.
Methods: The study was carried out on the fourth, fifth and sixth year medical students of Kafkas University Medicine Faculty in the 2019–2020 academic year. Data collection questions were prepared with a five-point Likert scale. The answers given by the students were automatically analyzed through the web system and the results were obtained through the software
Results: The participation of the students to the opinions of the questions 1, 2, 4, 8, 10 and 12 is quite high (73.2%, 74.6%, 56.3%, 67.6%, 52.1%, 62%). In general, the students want the integration of anatomy into clinical branches in a more up-to-date manner, apart from the traditional anatomy course.
Conclusion: This study was conducted for the importance and awareness of the integration of clinical and anatomy branches with each other. Student opinions were taken to emphasize the importance of the study. Anatomy basis is very important for surgical branches. Apart from classical anatomy education, anatomy education should keep up with technological developments and should be more integrated with clinical branches.

Project Number

yok

References

  • Are C, Stoddard HA, Northam LC, Thompson JS, Todd GL. An experience in surgical anatomy to provide first-year medical students with an early exposure to general surgery: a pilot study. Journal of surgical education 2009; 66(4): 186-189.
  • Bahsi I, Topal Z, Cetkin M, Orhan M, Kervancioglu P, Odabasioglu ME, Cihan OF. Evaluation of attitudes and opinions of medical faculty students against the use of cadaver in anatomy education and investigation of the factors affecting their emotional responses related thereto. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2020: 1-7.
  • Bahsi I, Cetkin, M, Orhan M, Kervancioglu P, Sayin S, Ayan H. Evaluation of attention-motivation level, studying environment and methods of medical faculty students. European Journal of Therapeutics 2017; 23(1): 1-7.
  • Biasutto, SN, Caussa LI, Río LEC. Teaching anatomy: cadavers vs. computers? Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 2006; 188(2): 187-190.
  • Cetkin M, Turhan B, Bahsi I, Kervancioglu P. The opinions of medicine faculty students about anatomy education. European Journal of Therapeutıcs 2016; 22: 82-88.
  • Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger 2016; 208: 151-157. Fitzpatrick CM, Kolesari GL, Brasel KJ. Teaching anatomy with surgeons' tools: Use of the laparoscope in clinical anatomy. Clinical Anatomy: The Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists 2001; 14(5): 349-353.
  • Heisler CA. Importance of adequate gross anatomy education: the impact of a structured pelvic anatomy course during gynecology fellowship. Anatomical sciences education 2011; 4(5): 302-304.
  • Hoyek N, Collet C, Di Rienzo F, De Almeida M, Guillot A. Effectiveness of three‐dimensional digital animation in teaching human anatomy in an authentic classroom context. Anatomical sciences education 2014;7(6):430-437.
  • Gozil R, Ozkan S, Bahcelioglu M, Kadıoglu D, Calguner E, Öktem H, Babus T. Gazi Universitesi Tıp Fakultesi 2. Sınıf Ögrencilerinin Anatomi Egitimini Degerlendirmeleri. Tıp Egitimi Dunyası 2006; 23(23): 27-32.
  • Gunderman RB, Wilson PK. Exploring the human interior: The roles of cadaver dissection and radiologic imaging in teaching anatomy. Academic Medicine 2005;80(8):745-749.
  • Kagan I I. Traditions and peculiarities of clinical anatomy education in Russia. Clinical Anatomy: The Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists 2002; 15(2): 152-156.
  • Lewis TL, Burnett B, Tunstall RG, Abrahams PH. Complementing anatomy education using three‐dimensional anatomy mobile software applications on tablet computers. Clinical Anatomy 2014; 27(3):313-320.
  • McLachlan JC, Bligh, J, Bradley P, Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Medical education 2004; 38(4): 418-424.
  • Morgan H, Zeller J, Hughes DT, Dooley-Hash S, Klein K, Caty R, Santen S. Applied clinical anatomy: the successful integration of anatomy into specialty-specific senior electives. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2017;39(1): 95-101.
  • Murgitroyd E, Madurska M, Gonzalez J,Watson A. 3D digital anatomy modelling–Practical or pretty? The Surgeon 2015; 13(3):177-180.
  • Orsbon CP, Kaiser RS, Ross CF. Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: A case for medical imaging and vertical integration. Anatomical sciences education 2014;7(4): 251-261.
  • Older J. Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. The Surgeon 2004; 2(2): 79-90.
  • Ozcan S, Huri E, Tatar I, Sargon M, Karakan T, Yagli OF, Larre S. Impact of cadaveric surgical anatomy training on urology resident’s knowledge: a preliminary study. Turkish journal of urology 2015; 41(2):83.
  • Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB. Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when? The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists 2006; 289(6): 215-218.
  • Singh R, Tubbs RS, Gupta K, Singh M, Jones DG, Kumar R. Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education/profession?—A review. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2015; 37(10): 1257-1265.
  • Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anatomical sciences education 2010; 3(2): 83-93.
  • Sure U, Benes L, Bozinov O, Woydt M, Tirakotai W, Bertalanffy H. Intraoperative landmarking of vascular anatomy by integration of duplex and Doppler ultrasonography in image-guided surgery. Technical note. Surgical neurology 2005;63(2): 133-142.
  • Zumwalt AC, Lufler RS, Monteiro J, Shaffer K. Building the body: Active learning laboratories that emphasize practical aspects of anatomy and integration with radiology. Anatomical sciences education 2010;3(3): 134-140.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Research articles
Authors

Erengül Boduç 0000-0001-8872-1993

Tülay Allahverdi

Project Number yok
Publication Date December 31, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Cite

Vancouver Boduç E, Allahverdi T. Student Opinions on the Importance and Detail of the Accumulation of Anatomy Knowledge Integrating General Surgery. Mid Blac Sea J Health Sci. 2020;6(3):385-9.

2310022108  22107  22106  22105  22103  22109 22137 22102  22110    e-ISSN 2149-7796