The objective of this study was to review the efficacy of physical therapy and rehabilitation approaches for low back pain, focusing on pain intensity and disability.
A survey of the literature was done in PubMed and Web of Science databases up to January 30, 2024. English studies were required, using keywords: “low back pain,” “pain intensity,” “pain severity,” “disability,” and “physical therapy.” Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale, including the 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale. Disability was assessed using Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Oswestry Disability Index. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria from 665 initial records. Interventions included osteopathic manipulative treatment, core muscle exercise with interferential current, cognitive functional therapy, dry cupping therapy, high-intensity machine-based core muscle resistance training,heat therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, pelvic traction, Reiki, dynamic muscular stabilization technique, and McGill Big 3. Sample sizes ranged from 30 to 1090 participants. Interferential current combined with core muscle exercises significantly reduced pain intensity compared to each method alone, though not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The high-intensity machine-based core muscle resistance training program group had greater pain relief (P<.001) and reduced disability (P=.002) compared to online integrated multidisciplinary therapy. No significant differences were found between dynamic muscular stabilization technique and McGill Big 3 groups (p >0.05). Dry cupping did not outperform sham cupping. Cognitive functional therapy reduced absenteeism in the first two years but not later. Reiki showed significant improvement in pain and Activities of Daily Living compared to drug therapy, but not to physiotherapy. Physical therapy interventions effectively alleviate symptoms and enhance results for low back pain. However, variability in interventions and outcome measures necessitates cautious interpretation. Further research with standardized protocols is essential to understand the effectiveness and optimal duration of physical therapy for Low Back Pain.
Since the research is a review, ethical permission was not required.
No supporting institution
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Physical Activity and Health |
Journal Section | Review |
Authors | |
Publication Date | November 30, 2024 |
Submission Date | May 31, 2024 |
Acceptance Date | October 25, 2024 |
Published in Issue | Year 2024 Volume: 10 Issue: 4 |