KOMPLİKASYONLU AKUT APANDİSİTİ TAHMİN ETMEDE İNFLAMATUVAR PARAMETRELERİN VE SKORLAMA SİSTEMLERİNİN ROLÜ

Year 2024, , 305 - 316, 30.09.2024

Mehmet Gökhan Kaya , Ethem Acar

https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1528717

Abstract

Amaç: Akut apandisit tanısı alan hastaların rutin parametrelerini değerlendirilerek, hastaların komplikasyon durumunu ve bu parametrelerin hastalığın ciddiyeti üzerindeki etkilerini tespit etmeyi amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma, acil serviste (AS) 1 Ocak 2019 ve 31 Aralık 2020 tarihleri arasında akut apandisit (AA) tanısı alan hastaların araştırıldığı retrospektif bir çalışmadır. Hastaların demografik verileri, kan tetkikleri, AS’de hesaplanan skorları kayıt altına alınmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya dâhil edilen 223 hastanın %63,7’si erkek olup yaş ortalaması 37.5 ± 16.8 yıl olarak hesaplanmıştır. Komplike apandisit (KA) olgularının hematolojik parametreler açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek nötrofil / lenfosit oranı (NLR), platelet / lenfosit oranı (PLR), C-reaktif protein (CRP), sistemik immun inflamasyon indeksi (SII), beyaz kan hücresi (WBC), nötrofil düzeylerine sahip olduğu bulunmuş; buna karşın lenfosit / C-reaktif protein oranı (LCRP) ve lenfosit düşüklüğü tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca KA olgularının istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek Apandisit İnflamatuar Yanıt (AIR) ve Alvarado skorlarına sahip oldukları tespit edilmiştir. KA tespit etmede AIR ve Alvarado skorları, LCRP ve NLR paramatrelerinin sensivite ve spesifiteleri incelendiğinde; AIR skoru için sırasıyla %85,9, %47,9 (kesme ≥6, %95 CI, 0.675-0.821, AUC: 0.748; p<0,01), Alvarado skoru için sırasıyla %80,6, %44,5 (kesme ≥6, %95 Cl, 0,527-0,683, AUC 0,605; p:0,10), olarak bulunmuştur.
Sonuç: İnflamatuvar belirteçlerin, KA / Non- komplike apandisit (NKA) ayrımında önemli parametreler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada; LCRP, SII, NLR, PLR gibi değerlerin, KA / NKA ayrımında kullanışlı parametreler olarak bulunmuştur.

Keywords

Akut apandisit, Apandisit inflamatuvar yanıt skoru, Alvarado skoru, Acil servis, Komplike apandisit, Non-komplike apandisit

THE ROLE OF INFLAMMATORY PARAMETERS AND SCORING SYSTEMS IN PREDICTING COMPLICATED ACUTE APPENDICITIS

Abstract

Aim: To assess the complications associated with acute appendicitis (AA) and to evaluate how specific routine patient parameters influence disease severity.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on patients diagnosed with AA who presented to the emergency department (ED) between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Data collected included demographic details, blood test results, and specific scoring systems utilized in the ED.
Results: Of the 223 patients studied, 63.7% were male with a mean age of 37.5 ± 16.8 years. Patients with complicated appendicitis (CA) showed significantly elevated hematological parameters such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), white blood cell count (WBC), and neutrophil levels. Conversely, decreased lymphocyte/C-reactive protein ratio (LCRP) and lymphocyte levels were noted. Furthermore, CA cases exhibited significantly greater Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) and Alvarado scores. In the context of diagnosing CA, the AIR score had a sensitivity of 85.9% and a specificity of 47.9% with a cut-off value of ≥6 (95% CI 0.675-0.821, Area Under the Curve (AUC): 0.748; p<0.01). The Alvarado score showed a sensitivity of 80.6% and a specificity of 44.5%, using a cut-off value of ≥6 (95% CI 0.527-0.683, AUC: 0.605; p=0.10).
Conclusion: Our study determined that inflammatory markers such as LCRP, SII, NLR, and PLR serve as significant indicators for distinguishing between CA and its NCA.

Keywords

Acute appendicitis, Appendicitis inflammatory response score, Alvarado score, Emergency department, Complicated appendicitis, Non-complicated appendicitis

References

• 1. Natesan S, Lee J, Volkamer H, Thoureen T. Evidence-Based Medicine Approach to Abdominal Pain. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2016 May; 34(2):165-90.
• 2. Abdolrazaghnejad A, Rajabpour-Sanati A, Rastegari-Najafabadi H, Ziaei M, Pakniyat A. The Role of Ultrasonography in Patients Referring to the Emergency Department with Acute Abdominal Pain. Adv J Emerg Med. 2019 May; 3(4):e:43.
• 3. Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH, et al. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg. 1997 Mar-Apr; 21(3):313-7.
• 4. Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M, Bodian C. How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar; 202(3):401-6.
• 5. Liang MK, Andersson RE, Jaffe BM, Berger DH. The Appendix. In: Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, et all editors. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 10ed. New York, McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.p.1241-1262.
• 6. Young P. Appendicitis and its history. Rev Med Chil, 2014. 142(5): p. 667-72.
• 7. Cormier JN, Gronchi A, Pollock RE. Appendix. In:Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Schwartz SI, editors. Schwartz's principles of surgery. Tenth edition. New York London : McGraw-Hill Education / Medical;2014.
• 8. Dinç T, Sapmaz A, Erkuş Y, Yavuz Z. Complicated or non-complicated appendicitis? That is the question. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Mar;28(3):390-394.
• 9. Alotaibi AM, Alfawaz M, Felemban L, Moshref L, Moshref R. Complicated appendicitis increases the hospital length of stay. Surg Open Sci. 2022 May 20;9:64-68.
• 10. Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ. Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;76(1-2):71-4.
• 11. Kaplan GG, Pedersen BV, Andersson RE, Sands BE, Korzenik J, Frisch M. The risk of developing Crohn's disease after an appendectomy: a population-based cohort study in Sweden and Denmark. Gut. 2007 Oct;56(10):1387-92.
• 12. Aren A, Gökçe A, Gökçe F, Özakay K, Aksoy Ş, Karagöz B ve ark. Akut apandisitin yaş, cinsiyet, lökosit değerleri ile ilişkisi. İstanbul Tıp Dergisi. 2009;10(3):126-129.
• 13. Brunicardi F, Andersen D, Billiar T, Dunn D, Hunter J, Matthews J. Schwartz's principles. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-hill; 2014.
• 14. Kahramanca S, Ozgehan G, Seker D, Gökce EI, Seker G, Tunç G et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Jan;20(1):19-22.
• 15. Hajibandeh S, Hobbs N, Mansour M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts acute appendicitis and distinguishes between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2020 Jan;19(1):154-163.
• 16. Rajalingam VR, Mustafa A, Ayeni A, Mahmood F, Shammout S, Singhal S, et al. The Role of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte-Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-Lymphocyte-Ratio (PLR) as a Biomarker for Distinguishing Between Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis. Cureus. 2022 Jan;14(1):e21446.
• 17. Celik B, Nalcacioglu H, Ozcatal M, Altuner Torun Y. Role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in identifying complicated appendicitis in the pediatric emergency department. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019 May;25(3):222-22.
• 18. Clyne B, Olshaker JS. The C-reactive protein. J Emerg Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;17(6):1019-25.
• 19. Fujiwara K, Abe A, Masatsugu T, Hirano T, Hiraka K, Sada M. Usefulness of several factors and clinical scoring models in preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis. PLoS One. 2021 Jul;16(7):e0255253.
• 20. Acar E, Demir A, Yıldırım B, Kaya MG, Gökçek K. The role of hemogram parameters and C-reactive protein in predicting mortality in COVID-19 infection. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14256.
• 21. Acar E, Gokcen H, Demir A, Yildirim B. Comparison of inflammation markers with prediction scores in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2021;122(6):418-423.
• 22. Kariya A, Krutsri C, Singhatas P, Sumritpradit P, Thampongsa T, Lertsitthichai P, et al. Incidence of complicated appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg Open. 2022 Aug;45:100512.
• 23. Wang AW, Prieto J, Ikeda DS, Lewis PR, Benzer EM, Van Gent JM. Perforated Appendicitis: An Unintended Consequence During the Coronavirus-19 Pandemic. Mil Med. 2021 Jan;186(1-2):e94-e97.
• 24. Yeşiltaş M, Karakaş DÖ, Gökçek B, Hot S, Eğin S. Can Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response scores evaluate the severity of acute appendicitis? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Nov;24(6):557-562.
• 25. Haak F, Kollmar O, Ioannidis A, Slotta JE, Ghadimi MB, Glass T, et al. Predicting complicated appendicitis based on clinical findings: the role of Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response scores. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):2051-2057.
• 26. Tsuboi M, Takase K, Kaneda I, Ishibashi T, Yamada T, Kitami M, et al. Perforated and nonperforated appendicitis: defect in enhancing appendiceal wall-depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2008 Jan;246(1):142-7.