PERKÜTAN NEFROLİTOTOMİ SONRASI UZAMIŞ İDRAR SIZINTISININ TEDAVİSİNDE FARKLI BİR YÖNTEM

Year 2012, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 43 - 45, 01.08.2012

Adnan Göcük Göksel Göktuğ Can Tuygun İnan Alışır Abdurrahim İmamoğlu

Abstract

Perkütan nefrolitotomi sonrasında gelişen uzamış idrar sızıntısı oldukça nadir görülen bir komplikasyondur. Bunların çoğu üreteral ödem, darlık ya da artık taşların obtrüksiyonuna bağlıdır. Tedavide J-J stend uygulaması gibi minimal invaziv işlemler genellikle yeterli olmaktadır. Ancak, bu tedaviye dirençli idrar sızıntılarında önerilen tedavi nefrokutanöz traktın ablasyonu ya da eksizyonu gibi oldukça invaziv tedavi yöntemlerdir. Biz burada, perkütan nefrolitotomi ameliyatı sonrasında, standart tedavilere yanıt alamadığımız uzamış idrar sızıntısı gelişen iki olguda uyguladığımız minimal invaziv olan bir yöntemi sunmaktayız

Keywords

Böbrek taşı, perkütan nefrolitotomi, uzamış idrar sızıntısı

A New Method for the Treatment of Prolonged Urinary Leakage After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Abstract

The prolonged urinary leakage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a very rarely encountered complication. Mostly it occurs due to ureteral edema, stenosis or obstruction by residual stones. Generally minimal invasive procedures, such as J-J stent application, are satisfactory for the treatment. However, invasive therapy methods such as ablation or excision of nephrocutaneous tract, are recommended for the urinary leakage, which is resistant to this treatment. In this study we are presenting the minimal invasive method, which is applied to two patients with prolonged urinary leakage, who were resistant to the standard treatment methods after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Keywords

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, prolonged urinary leakage, renal stone

References

• 1. Noor Buchholz NP. Colon perforation after percutaneous nephrolithotmy revisited. Urol Int 2004;72:88-90.
• 2. Abbou CC, Belas M, Kouri G, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 1984: Technics, results ndications. Ann Urol 1984;18:371-80.
• 3. Shah O, Assimos DG. Complications of percutaneous renal surgery. In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Bagley DH, Clayman RV, Docimo SG, editors, Smith's textbook of endourology, Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis, 2006: 161-5.
• 4. Marcovich R, Jacobson AI, Singh J, et al. No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2004;18:743-7.
• 5. Zagoria RJ, Dyer RB. Do's and don't's of percutaneous nephrostomy. Acad Radiol 1999; 6:370-7.
• 6. Witten DM, Myers GH, Utz DC, et al. Fistulas of the urinary tract. In: Witten DM, Myers GH, Utz DC, editors. Emmett's clinical urography, 4. Baskı. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1977: 1767-84.
• 7. Das S, Ching V. Nephrocutaneous sinus: Acase report. J Urol 1979;122:232
• 8. Lewi H J, Scott R. Calculocutaneous sinus. Urology 1986;28:232-4.
• 9. Sharma SK, Perry KT, Turk TM. Endoscopic injection of fibrin glue for the treatment of urinary tract pathology. J Endourol 2005;19: 419-23.
• 10. Bradford TJ, Wolf JS Jr. Percutaneous injection of fibrin glue for persistent nephrocutaneous fistula after partial nephrectomy. Urology 2005;65:799.