Postoperative Pain Following Single Visit Root Canal Treatment With Reciproc Blue And Hyflex EDM Instrumentation; A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Year 2024, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 78 - 84, 05.07.2024

Nimet Gençoğlu Anıl Özgün Karatekin Mustafa Gündoğar

https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1508747

Abstract

Objective: Single file systems with continuous rotation or reciprocation produced with many new technologies promising in terms of postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of using novel Reciproc Blue (RBlue) and HyFlex EDM (HEDM) files on postoperative pain after single visit root canal treatment.

Materials and Methods: 72 patients with asymptomatic pulp necrosis in mandibular molar and premolar teeth were included. The root canals were prepared using HEDM (n=29) or RBlue (n=28) and hand-instruments (n=15) in single visit. Pain presence using verbal rating scale (VRS) and analgesic intake were recorded after 24h, 48h, 72h and 7 days.

Results: Postoperative pain at 24h and 48h was statistically higher at RBlue group than HEDM and control groups (p<0.05). After 72 hours, the incidence of postoperative pain decreased and on the 7th day, none of the patients reported pain (p>0.05).There was no difference between groups in terms of analgesic intake (p>0.05). RBlue files were associated with higher incidence of postoperative pain and higher VRS scores than HEDM and hand-instruments.

Conclusion: RBlue files working with reciprocating motion caused much more postoperative pain than HEDM files and manual files.

Keywords

Analgesic intake, Continuous rotation, Endodontics, Reciprocation, Root canal treatment

References

• 1. Nixdorf DR, Moana-Filho EJ, Law AS, McGuire LA, Hodges JS, John MT. Frequency of persistent tooth pain after root canal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of endodontics. 2010;36(2):224-30.
• 2. Kherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, Zuolo ML, Kishen A, da Silveira Bueno CE. Comparison of the incidence of postoperative pain after using 2 reciprocating systems and a continuous rotary system: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Journal of Endodontics. 2016;42(2):171-6.
• 3. Shokraneh A, Ajami M, Farhadi N, Hosseini M, Rohani B. Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clinical oral investigations. 2017;21(1):413-8. Epub 2016/04/05. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1807-2. PubMed PMID: 27041109.
• 4. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. Journal of endodontics. 2004;30(7):476-81.
• 5. Martins CM, De Souza Batista VE, Andolfatto Souza AC, Andrada AC, Mori GG, Gomes Filho JE. Reciprocating kinematics leads to lower incidences of postoperative pain than rotary kinematics after endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. 2019;22(4):320-31. Epub 2019/12/06. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_439_18. PubMed PMID: 31802813; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6873607.
• 6. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni‐Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. International endodontic journal. 2008;41(4):339-44.
• 7. De-Deus G, Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, Elias CN, Plotino G, et al. Blue Thermomechanical Treatment Optimizes Fatigue Resistance and Flexibility of the Reciproc Files. Journal of Endodontics. 2017;43(3):462-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.039.
• 8. Iacono F, Pirani C, Generali L, Bolelli G, Sassatelli P, Lusvarghi L, et al. Structural analysis of HyFlex EDM instruments. Int Endod J. 2017;50(3):303-13. Epub 2016/02/13. doi: 10.1111/iej.12620. PubMed PMID: 26864081.
• 9. Pedullà E, Savio FL, Boninelli S, Plotino G, Grande NM, La Rosa G, et al. Torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of a new nickel-titanium instrument manufactured by electrical discharge machining. Journal of endodontics. 2016;42(1):156-9.
• 10. Alomaym MAA, Aldohan MFM, Alharbi MJ, Alharbi NA. Single versus multiple sitting endodontic treatment: Incidence of postoperative pain–A randomized controlled trial. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 2019;9(2):172.
• 11. Su Y, Wang C, Ye L. Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single-versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review. Journal of endodontics. 2011;37(2):125-32.
• 12. Adıgüzel M, Yılmaz K, Tüfenkçi P. Comparison of postoperative pain intensity after using reciprocating and continuous rotary glide path systems: a randomized clinical trial. Restorative dentistry & endodontics. 2019;44(1).
• 13. Bürklein S, Flüch S, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved canals: WaveOne and Reciproc versus WaveOne Gold and Reciproc blue. Odontology. 2019;107(1):96-102.
• 14. Lopes LPB, Herkrath FJ, Vianna ECB, Júnior ECG, Marques AAF, Júnior ECS. Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: a randomized, controlled, clinical study. Clinical oral investigations. 2019;23(1):285-92.
• 15. Ng YL, Glennon J, Setchell D, Gulabivala K. Prevalence of and factors affecting post‐obturation pain in patients undergoing root canal treatment. International endodontic journal. 2004;37(6):381-91.
• 16. AlOmari T, AlThobiti G, AlThobaiti S, AlOufi F, Masuadi E, Jamleh A. Incidence of postoperative pain after canal shaping by using Reciproc and Twisted File Adaptive systems: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Clinical oral investigations. 2020;24(7):2445-50.
• 17. Aasim S, Mellor A, Qualtrough A. The effect of pre‐soaking and time in the ultrasonic cleaner on the cleanliness of sterilized endodontic files. International endodontic journal. 2006;39(2):143-9.
• 18. Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, Milana V, Plotino G, Grande NM, et al. The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Annali di stomatologia. 2013;4(1):152-5. Epub 2013/06/07. doi: 10.11138/ads.0152. PubMed PMID: 23741536; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3671808.
• 19. Nagendrababu V, Gutmann JL. Factors associated with postobturation pain following single-visit nonsurgical root canal treatment: A systematic review. Quintessence International. 2017;48(3).
• 20. Ahmed Y, Emara R, Sarhan S, El Boghdadi R, El‐Bayoumi M, El‐Far H, et al. Post‐treatment endodontic pain following occlusal reduction in mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and sensitivity to percussion: a single‐centre randomized controlled trial. International Endodontic Journal. 2020;53(9):1170-80.
• 21. Rosenberg PA, Babick PJ, Schertzer L, Leung A. The effect of occlusal reduction on pain after endodontic instrumentation. Journal of endodontics. 1998;24(7):492-6
• 22. Caviedes‐Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz H. The influence of two reciprocating single‐file and two rotary‐file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Endodontic Journal. 2016;49(3):255-70.
• 23. Sun C, Sun J, Tan M, Hu B, Gao X, Song J. Pain after root canal treatment with different instruments: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Oral diseases. 2018;24(6):908-19.
• 24. Cicek E, Kocak MM, Kocak S, Sağlam BC, Türker SA. Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2017;25(1):20-6.
• 25. Hou X-M, Su Z, Hou B-X. Post endodontic pain following single-visit root canal preparation with rotary vs reciprocating instruments: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):1-7.
• 26. Ruiz-Hubard EE, Gutmann JL, Wagner MJ. A quantitative assessment of canal debris forced periapically during root canal instrumentation using two different techniques. Journal of Endodontics. 1987;13(12):554-8.
• 27. Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M, Plotino G. Apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with Reciproc blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo shaper nickel-titanium files. Journal of endodontics. 2018;44(5):856-9.
• 28. Silva RV, Alcalde MP, Horta MC, Rodrigues CT, Silveira FF, Duarte MA, et al. Root canal shaping of curved canals by Reciproc Blue system and Pro Taper Gold: A micro-computed tomographic study. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2021;13(2):e112-e8. Epub 2021/02/13. doi: 10.4317/jced.57180. PubMed PMID: 33574995; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7864361.
• 29. Karatekin A, Keleş A, Gençoğlu N. Comparison of continuous wave and cold lateral condensation filling techniques in 3D printed simulated C-shape canals instrumented with Reciproc Blue or Hyflex EDM. PloS one. 2019;14(11):e0224793. Epub 2019/11/22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224793. PubMed PMID: 31751375; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6871781.
• 30. Plotino G, Rubini AG, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Journal of Endodontics. 2014;40(8):1228-30.
• 31. Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. Journal of endodontics. 2011;37(4):429-38.