THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT STAINING SOLUTIONS ON THE COLOR STABILITY OF PERMANENT INDIRECT COMPOSITE RESINS PRODUCED BY ADDITIVE AND SUBTRACTIVE TECHNIQUES

Year 2024, Volume: 25 Issue: 3, 262 - 278, 30.09.2024

Nazire Esra Özer , Zeynep Şahin , Cansu Yıkıcı Çöl , Özlem Arık , Mehmet Ali Kılıçarslan

https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1533026

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of various beverages on the color stability of permanent composite resins produced by additive (AM) or subtractive manufacturing (SM) techniques comparatively.
Materials and Methods: Six composite resin materials produced by SM (Vita Enamic-VE, Cerasmart-CE, Lava Ultimate-LU) and AM (Varseo Smile Crown plus-VSC, Saremco print Crowntech-SPC, Formlabs 3B Permanent Crown-FPC) techniques were selected and soaked in different solutions (artificial saliva, black tea, coffee) for different times (0, 1 and 7 days). L*, a*, b* values of the samples were recorded using a spectrophotometer. The color changes of the samples were determined using the CIELAB formula. In determining the color differences between the test materials, Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used when one-way analysis of variance wasn’t available. Results: Group VE was the least stained group on the 1st and 7th day of artificial saliva solution and the 7th day of coffee solution, while Group CE was the least stained group on the 1st day of coffee solution. In the tea solution, on the 1st and 7th days, there wasn’t difference in the materials' color change (p>0.05). Tea and coffee solutions caused statistically significantly more color change in all test materials than artificial saliva (except Group CE on the 7th day, Group VSC and FPC on the 1st day) (p<0.05). Conclusion: 3D permanent composite resins generally showed more staining than CAD/CAM milled composite resins. Tea and coffee staining solutions changed the color of the materials compared to artificial saliva. As the storage time increased, more color changes were observed.

Keywords

Composite Resins, 3D printing, CAD/CAM milling

FARKLI BOYAMA SOLÜSYONLARININ EKLEMELİ VE EKSİLTMELİ TEKNİKLERLE ÜRETİLEN KALICI İNDİREKT KOMPOZİT REZİNLERİN RENK STABİLİTESİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Abstract

Amaç: Çeşitli içeceklerin, eklemeli (AM) veya eksiltmeli üretim (SM) teknikleriyle üretilen daimi kompozit rezinlerin renk stabilitesi üzerindeki etkilerini karşılaştırmalı olarak araştırmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: SM (Vita Enamic-VE, Cerasmart-CE, Lava Ultimate-LU) ve AM (VarseoSmile Crown plus-VSC, Saremco print CROWNTECH-SPC, Formlabs 3B Permanent Crown-FPC) teknikleriyle üretilen altı kompozit rezin materyal seçilmiş ve farklı solüsyonlarda (yapay tükürük, siyah çay, kahve) farklı sürelerde (1 ve 7 gün) bekletilmiştir. Örneklerin L*, a*, b* değerleri spektrofotometre kullanılarak kaydedilmiştir. Örneklerin renk değişimleri CIELAB formülü kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Test materyalleri arasındaki renk farklılıklarının belirlenmesinde, parametrik dağılan verilerde ANOVA, non-parametrik verilerde ise Kruskal-Wallis analizi kullanılmıştır.
Sonuçlar: Grup VE, yapay tükürük solüsyonunun 1. ve 7. günlerinde ve kahve solüsyonunun 7. gününde en az lekelenen grup olurken, Grup CE kahve solüsyonunun 1. gününde en az lekelenen grup olmuştur. Çay solüsyonunda ise 1. ve 7. günlerde materyallerin renk değişimleri arasında fark bulunmamıştır (p>0.05). Çay ve kahve solüsyonları tüm test materyallerinde yapay tükürükten istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha fazla renk değişimine neden olmuştur (7. günde Grup CE, 1. günde Grup VSC ve FPC hariç) (p<0.05).
Sonuç: 3D daimi kompozit rezinler CAD/CAM freze kompozit rezinlere kıyasla genel olarak daha fazla boyanma göstermiştir. Çay ve kahve boyama solüsyonları yapay tükürüğe kıyasla materyallerin rengini değiştirmiştir. Saklama süresi arttıkça daha fazla renk değişimi gözlenmiştir.

Keywords

Kompozit Rezinler, 3D baskı, CAD/CAM frezeleme, Renk stabilitesi

References

• 1. Lee EH, Ahn JS, Lim YJ, Kwon HB, Kim MJ. Effect of post-curing time on the color stability and related properties of a tooth-colored 3D-printed resin material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;126:104993.
• 2. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44-56.
• 3. Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Güth JF. 3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry: An overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing. J Clin Med. 2021;10(9).
• 4. Bhargav A, Sanjairaj V, Rosa V, Feng LW, Fuh Yh J. Applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018;106(5):2058-64.
• 5. Monzón M, Ortega Z, Martínez A, Ortega F. Standardization in additive manufacturing: activities carried out by international organizations and projects. IJAMT. 2015;76:1111-21.
• 6. Sulaiman TA. Materials in digital dentistry-A review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):171-81.
• 7. Aati S, Shrestha B, Fawzy A. Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial efficiency of ZrO2 nanoparticles reinforced 3D printed resins. Dent Mater. 2022;38(8):1432-42.
• 8. Atria PJ, Bordin D, Marti F, Nayak VV, Conejo J, Benalcázar Jalkh E, et al. 3D-printed resins for provisional dental restorations: Comparison of mechanical and biological properties. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(5):804-15.
• 9. Simoneti DM, Pereira-Cenci T, Dos Santos MBF. Comparison of material properties and biofilm formation in interim single crowns obtained by 3D printing and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(1):168-72. 10. Zimmermann M, Ender A, Egli G, Özcan M, Mehl A. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-fabricated and 3D-printed composite crowns as a function of material thickness. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(6):2777-84.
• 11. Borella PS, Alvares LAS, Ribeiro MTH, Moura GF, Soares CJ, Zancopé K, et al. Physical and mechanical properties of four 3D-printed resins at two different thick layers: An in vitro comparative study. Dent Mater. 2023;39(8):686.
• 12. Nam NE, Hwangbo NK, Jin G, Shim JS, Kim JE. Effects of heat-treatment methods on cytocompatibility and mechanical properties of dental products 3D-printed using photopolymerized resin. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;67(1):121-31.
• 13. Jin G, Gu H, Jang M, Bayarsaikhan E, Lim JH, Shim JS, et al. Influence of postwashing process on the elution of residual monomers, degree of conversion, and mechanical properties of a 3D printed crown and bridge materials. Dent Mater. 2022;38(11):1812-25.
• 14. Ozer NE, Sahin Z, Yikici C, Duyan S, Kilicarslan MA. Bacterial adhesion to composite resins produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing. Odontology. 2024;112(2):460-71.
• 15. Vichi A, Balestra D, Scotti N, Louca C, Paolone G. Translucency of CAD/CAM and 3D printable composite materials for permanent dental restorations. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(6).
• 16. Espinar C, Bona AD, Pérez MM, Tejada-Casado M, Pulgar R. The influence of printing angle on color and translucency of 3D printed resins for dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2023;39(4):410-7.
• 17. Alharbi N, Alharbi A, Osman R. Stain susceptibility of 3D-printed nanohybrid composite restorative material and the efficacy of different stain removal techniques: An in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(19).
• 18. Deligeorgi V, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Prim Dent Care. 2001;8(1):5-11.
• 19. Park JK, Kim TH, Ko CC, García-Godoy F, Kim HI, Kwon YH. Effect of staining solutions on discoloration of resin nanocomposites. Am J Dent. 2010;23(1):39-42.
• 20. Kim JH, Lee YK, Powers JM. Influence of a series of organic and chemical substances on the translucency of resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;77(1):21-7.
• 21. Mundim FM, Garcia Lda F, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(3):249-54.
• 22. Alharbi N, Wismeijer D, Osman RB. Additive manufacturing techniques in prosthodontics: Where do we currently stand? A critical review. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(5):474–84.
• 23. Mostafavi D, Methani MM, Piedra-Cascón W, Zandinejad A, Att W, Revilla-León M. Influence of polymerization postprocessing procedures on the accuracy of additively manufactured dental model material. Int J Prosthodont. 2023;36(4):479-85.
• 24. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27:S1-S9.
• 25. Soares-Geraldo D, Scaramucci T, Steagall W, Jr., Braga SR, Sobral MA. Interaction between staining and degradation of a composite resin in contact with colored foods. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25(4):369-75.
• 26. Adawi HA, Al Mialeem MM, Al Ahmari NM, Shariff M, Qahhar MA, Muharraq SMH, et al. Assessment of color stainability of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials after hot and cold coffee ımmersion at different time ıntervals. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e932745.
• 27. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. JADA. 2008;139:S8-S13.
• 28. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2004;32 Suppl 1:3-12.
• 29. Aydın N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Kılıçarslan MA. Investigating the color changes on resin‐based CAD/CAM blocks. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):251-6.
• 30. Espinar Pulgar C, Della Bona A, Pérez Gómez MDM, Pulgar Encinas RM. Color and optical properties of 3D printing restorative polymer-based materials: A scoping review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(6):853-864.
• 31. de Castro EF, Nima G, Rueggeberg FA, Araújo-Neto VG, Faraoni JJ, Palma-Dibb RG, et al. Effect of build orientation in gloss, roughness and color of 3D-printed resins for provisional indirect restorations. Dent Mater. 2023;39(7):e1-e11.
• 32. Shishehian A, Firouz F, Khazaee S, Rajabi H, Farhadian M, Niaghiha F. Evaluating the color stability of 3D-printed resins against various solutions. Eur J Transl Myol. 2023;33(3).
• 33. Almejrad L, Yang CC, Morton D, Lin WS. The effects of beverages and surface treatments on the color stability of 3D-printed interim restorations. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(2):165-70.
• 34. Atria PJ, Lagos I, Sampaio CS. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness, color stability, and color masking of provisional restoration materials for veneers and crowns. Int J Comput Dent. 2020;23(4):343-50.
• 35. Shin JW, Kim JE, Choi YJ, Shin SH, Nam NE, Shim JS, et al. Evaluation of the color stability of 3D-printed crown and bridge materials against various sources of discoloration: An in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(23).
• 36. Seyidaliyeva A, Rues S, Evagorou Z, Hassel AJ, Rammelsberg P, Zenthöfer A. Color stability of polymer‐infiltrated‐ceramics compared with lithium disilicate ceramics and composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(1):43-50.
• 37. Ardu S, Braut V, Di Bella E, Lefever D. Influence of background on natural tooth colour coordinates: an in vivo evaluation. Odontology. 2014;102(2):267-71.
• 38. Nozaki K, Koizumi H, Horiuchi N, Nakamura M, Okura T, Yamashita K, et al. Suppression effects of dental glass-ceramics with polarization-induced highly dense surface charges against bacterial adhesion. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(5):671-8.
• 39. Aydın N, Topçu FT, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Erdemir U. Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(5):e446-e54.
• 40. Topcu FT, Sahinkesen G, Yamanel K, Erdemir U, Oktay EA, Ersahan S. Influence of different drinks on the colour stability of dental resin composites. Eur J Dent. 2009;3(1):50-6.
• 41. Güler AU, Güler E, Yücel AC, Ertaş E. Effects of polishing procedures on color stability of composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(2):108-112.
• 42. Lee YK, Yu B, Lim HN, Lim JI. Difference in the color stability of direct and indirect resin composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(2):154-60.
• 43. Seyidaliyeva A, Rues S, Evagorou Z, Hassel AJ, Rammelsberg P, Zenthöfer A. Color stability of polymer-infiltrated-ceramics compared with lithium disilicate ceramics and composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(1):43-50.
• 44. Bahannan SA. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. J Dent. 2014;42(1):48-52.
• 45. Kim JE, Choi WH, Lee D, Shin Y, Park SH, Roh BD, et al. Color and translucency stability of three-dimensional printable dental materials for crown and bridge restorations. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(3).
• 46. O'Brien WJ, Hemmendinger H, Boenke KM, Linger JB, Groh CL. Color distribution of three regions of extracted human teeth. Dent Mater. 1997;13(3):179-85.
• 47. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM. Effects of sports drinks on color stability of nanofilled and microhybrid composites after long-term immersion. J Dent. 2012;40 Suppl 2:e55-63.
• 48. Al-Dharrab A. Effect of energy drinks on the color stability of nanofilled composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(4):704-11.
• 49. Duarte S, Sartori N, Phark J-H. Ceramic-reinforced polymers: CAD/CAM hybrid restorative materials. Curr. Oral Health Rep. 2016;3:198-202.
• 50. Paolone G, Mandurino M, De Palma F, Mazzitelli C, Scotti N, Breschi L, et al. Color stability of polymer-based composite CAD/CAM blocks: A systematic review. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(2).
• 51. Espinar C, Della Bona A, Tejada-Casado M, Pulgar R, Pérez MM. Optical behavior of 3D-printed dental restorative resins: Influence of thickness and printing angle. Dent Mater. 2023;39(10):894-902.