Students’ Perceptions About the Instructors’ Competence in Technology-supported Courses at Dental Faculty: A Cross-sectional Study

Year 2023, Volume: 24 Issue: 3, 187 - 192, 30.09.2023

Çiğdem Çetin Genç , Yeşim Deniz , Celal Genç , Alpin Değirmenci , İlgi Tosun

Abstract

Objective: The pandemic has highlighted the importance of technology-supported courses throughout the world. Evaluating the perceptions of students attending these courses is important to provide high-quality education.
Materials and Methods: This study was carried out on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd-grade dentistry students. The “Student Perceptions Scale Regarding the Knowledge of Instructors in Technology - Supported Classrooms” was applied to 207 dentistry students. This scale consists of four sub-dimensions: subject matter knowledge (SMK), technological knowledge (TK), knowledge of students’ understanding (KSU), and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK).
Results: SMK, KSU, and TPCK sub-dimension scores did not significantly differ by gender (p>0.05). However, the mean TK score of females (3.55±0.47) was found to be significantly higher than that of males (3.28±0.59) (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference among the SMK, TK, KSU, and TPCK sub-dimension mean scores by age (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the mean scores of the SMK and KSU sub-dimensions by grade (p-values are p<0.001 and p=0.015 respectively). The mean TK and TPCK sub-dimension scores yielded no significant difference by grade (p-values are p=0.368 and p=0.050 respectively).
Conclusion: Measuring the quality of technology-assisted teaching and the instructor’s TPCK from the student’s perspective and determining student perceptions will provide accurate data on the long-term quality of education.

Keywords

Dental education, students, perception, technology-supported course

References

• 1. Bennett S, Bishop AG, Dalgarno B, Waycott J, Kennedy G. Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Comput Educ 2012; 59: 524-34.
• 2. Angeli C, Valanides N. Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICTTPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Comput Educ 2009; 52: 154-68.
• 3. Şenel S, Pekdağ B, Sarıtaş MT. Turkish Adaptation of Instrument for Assessing Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Faculty Knowledge in Technology-Supported Class Environments. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education 2018; 7: 67-93.
• 4. Shih CL, Chuang HH. The development and validation of an instrument for assessing college students’ perceptions of faculty knowledge in technology-supported class environments. Comput Educ 2013; 63: 109-18.
• 5. Chang TY, Hong G, Paganelli C, Phantumvanit P, Chang WJ, Shieh YS, et al. Innovation of dental education during COVID-19 pandemic. J Dent Sci 2021; 16: 15-20.
• 6. Vian A, Opoku A. Technology supported learning and pedagogy in times of crisis: the case of COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) 2022; 27: 365-405.
• 7. Bolliger DU, Halupa C. An Investigation of Instructors’ Online Teaching Readiness. TechTrends 2022; 66: 185-95.
• 8. König J, Jäger-Biela DJ, Glutsch N. Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. Eur J Teach Educ 2020; 43: 608-22.
• 9. Tuan HL, Chang HP, Wang KH, Treagust DF. The development of an instrument for assessing students’ perceptions of teachers’ knowledge. Int J Sci Educ 2000; 22: 385-98.
• 10. Shulman LS. Those Who Understand: A Conception of Teacher Knowledge. Am Educ 1986; 10: 9-15.
• 11. Uner S, Akkus H. Secondary students’ perceptions of their teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: a scale development study. Teach Dev 2019; 23: 566-87.
• 12. Adam LA, Oranje J, Rich AM, Meldrum A. Advancing dental education: feedback processes in the clinical learning environment. J Royal Soc New Zealand 2020; 50(Suppl): 144-57.
• 13. Javed MQ, Ahmed A, Habib SR. Undergraduate Dental Students’ And Instructors’ Perceptions About The Quality Of Clinical Feedback. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2021; 33: 82-8.
• 14. Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horiz. 2001; 9: 1-6.
• 15. Chang TY, Hong G, Paganelli C, Phantumvanit P, Chang WJ, Shieh YS, et al. Innovation of dental education during COVID-19 pandemic. J Dent Sci 2021; 16: 15-20.