Sociodemographic Characteristics of Persons Treated in the High Security Forensic Psychiatry Service: A Retrospective Study

Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 73 - 80, 01.01.2022

Burcu Sırlıer Emir Aslı Kazğan Osman Kurt Sevler Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.969218

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Aim: In the study, it is aimed to analyze the sociodemographic characteristics of the convicted patients, who were treated in the High-Security Forensic Psychiatry Services (HSFPS) of Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital within a period of one year.
Material and Methods: 409 convicted psychiatric patients, who applied to Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital High-Security Forensic Psychiatry Service were included in this study between March 2020 and March 2021. Personal data pertaining to these patients were obtained from hospital archive records. A general information questionnaire including sociodemographic data prepared by the authors, was used in the study. The sociodemography data form consists of 20 questions in total.
Results: The analysis of the collected data revealed that the convicted psychiatric patients were mostly single or divorced, that they lived mostly in the city, that 51.1% of them have not worked at any job, that 40.7% of them had a psychiatric disorder with psychotic features, that 84.4% of them committed a crime for the first time and that these crimes were mostly directed at other individuals.
Conclusion: In our study, it was observed that the diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders was more common in the convicted group. The high unemployment rate shows the importance of vocational rehabilitation, and the high number of untreated patients shows that closer follow-up will be beneficial. This study shows that applications to high-security forensic psychiatry services are high and it may be beneficial to increase their number throughout the country.

Keywords

high-security forensic psychiatry service, prophlylactic treatment, medical observation, sociodemographic characteris

References

• 1. Yanık M. Turkish Mental Health System and Evaluations, Mental Health Action Plan Proposal. Reviews, Cases and Hypotheses in Psychiatry. 2007;Özel sayı:24-6.
• 2. Engstrom EJ. History of forensic psychiatry. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009;22(6):576-581.
• 3. Savrun BM. Türkiye’de adli psikiyatri uygulamaları. Türkiye Klinikleri Psikiyatri Özel Dergisi. 2011; 4(1): 60-6.
• 4. Rutherford M, Duggan S. Forensic mental health services: facts and figures on current provision. The British Journal of Forensic Practice. 2008.
• 5. Bergenheim A. Sexual assault, irresistible impulses, and forensic psychiatry in Sweden. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014;37(1): 99-108.
• 6. Öncü F, Ger C. Zorunlu Tedavi. İçinde: Sercan M, editör. Adli Psikiyatri Uygulama Klavuzu, 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Psikiyatri Derneği Yayınları; 2007. p.51-69.
• 7. Polat H, Karakaş SA. Adli Psikiyatri Hemşireliği. Ebelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 3(3): 225-32.
• 8. Bolu A, Toygar M, Pan E ve ark. Bir eğitim hastanesi psikiyatri kliniğinde adli olguların değerlendirilmesi; beş yıllık inceleme. Gülhane Tıp Derg. 2014; 56:1-4.
• 9. Polat S, Hocaoğlu Ç. Bir eğitim ve araştırma hastanesi psikiyatri polikliniğine yönlendirilen adli olguların değerlendirilmesi. Ortadogu Tıp Derg. 2020; 12(2): 290-4.
• 10. Türkcan S, İncesu C, Canbek Ö ve ark. 1831 adli olgunun tanı dağılımı ve tanı-suç bağlantısının değerlendirilmesi. Düşünen Adam Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi. 2000; 13:132-7. 11.Swanson JW, Swartz MS, Essock SM, et al. The social-environmental context of violent behavior in persons treated for severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 92: 1523-31.
• 12. Kessler RC, Foster CL, Saunders WB, Stang PE. Social consequences of psychiatric disorders, I: Educational attainment. Am J Psychiatry. 1995; 52(7): 1026-32.
• 13. Camcıoğlu TH, Öncü F, Şüküroğlu S, et al. Bipolar I Bozukluğu Olan Erkek Olguların Suç İşlemesinde Sosyodemografik ve Sosyoekonomik Etmenlerin Etkisi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2012; 25(3).
• 14. Liberman RP, Jacobs HE, Blackwell GA. Overcoming psychiatric disability through skills training, in Psychiatric Disability: Clinical, Legal, and Administrative Dimensions. Edited by Meyerson AT, Fine TF. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1987.
• 15. Baron RC, Salzer MS. Career patterns of persons with serious mental illness: generating a new vision of lifetime careers for those in recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills. 2000; 4:136-156.
• 16. Draine J, Salzer MS, Culhane DP, Hadley TR. Role of social disadvantage in crime, joblessness, and homelessness among persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services. 2002; 53(5): 565-73.
• 17. Hudson CG. Socioeconomic status and mental illness: tests of the social causation and selection hypotheses. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2005; 75(1): 3-18.
• 18. Lurigio AJ. People with serious mental illness in the criminal justice system: Causes, consequences, and correctives. The Prison Journal. 2011; 91(3suppl): 66-86.
• 19. Nixon M, Thomas SD, Daffern M, Ogloff JR. Estimating the risk of crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a data-linkage study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017; 52(5): 617-26.
• 20. Fogden BC, Thomas SD, Daffern M, Ogloff JR. Crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a case linkage study. BMC psychiatry. 2016; 16(1): 1-9.
• 21. Dolenc B, Dernovšek MZ, Sprah L, et al. Relationship between affective temperaments and aggression in euthymic patients with bipolar mood disorder and major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2015; 174: 13-8.
• 22. Nijman H, Cima M, Merckelbach H. Nature and antecedents of psychotic patients' crimes. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 2003; 14(3): 542-53.
• 23. Swinson N, Flynn S, While D, et al. Trends in rates of mental illness in homicide perpetrators. Br J Psychiatry. 2011; 198: 485-9.
• 24. McGrath M, Oyebode F. Characteristics of perpetrators of homicide in independent inquiries. Med Sci Law. 2005; 45: 233-43.
• 25. İnan S, Yıldızhan E, Öncü F. İnsana Yönelik Ciddi Suç İşleyen Adli Psikiyatri Olgularının Hastalık Öyküleri, Sosyodemografik ve Suç Özellikleri. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2018; 29(4).
• 26. Ghiasi N, Azhar Y, Singh J. Psychiatric illness and criminality. StatPearls. 2020 [Internet].
• 27. Volavka J, Citrome L. Pathways to aggression in schizophrenia affect results of treatment. Schizophr Bull. 2011; 37(5): 921-9.
• 28. Walsh E, Buchanan A, Fahy T. Violence and schizophrenia: examining the evidence. Br J Psychiatry. 2002; 180: 490-5.
• 29. Dickens G, Stubbs J, Popham R, Haw C. (2005). Smoking in a forensic psychiatric service: a survey of inpatients’ views. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2005; 12(6): 672-8.
• 30. Kelly TM, Daley DC, Douaihy AB. Treatment of substance abusing patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders. Addict Behav. 2012; 37(1): 11-24.
• 31. Cuellar J, Curry TR. The prevalence and comorbidity between delinquency, drug abuse, suicide attempts, physical and sexual abuse, and self-mutilation among delinquent Hispanic females. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2007; 29(1): 68-82.
• 32. Türkcan S, Yeşilbursa D, Saatçioğlu Ö ve ark. Adli Psikiyatri ve Kurunıdışı izleme.
• 32. Coid J, Hickey N, Yang M. Comparison of outcomes following aftercare from forensic and general adult psychiatric services. Br J Psychiatry. 2007; 190: 509-14.
• 33. Özbay Y. Factors affecting compliance with compulsory outpatient treatment after compulsory clinical treatment in cases whose criminal responsibility has been lifted. Ph.D. thesis, Bakirkoy Prof. Dr. Mazhar Osman Mental Health and Neurological Diseases Training and Research Hospital İstanbul, 2010.