Abstract
Bouchard (1995) argues that it is not only the psychological nouns and verbs but also the psychological constructions in their all forms are subject to analysis as the linguistic manifestations of psychological states in a language. In Turkish, psychological states can be expressed with compound forms as well as by lexical means. The paper analyzes compound constructions in Turkish which have psych meanings from two different points of view;
1. according to the structural properties of their components
2. according to their relation with psychological verb types in Turkish proposed in İbe (2004).
The analysis shows that compound psych constructions in Turkish form distinct classes which require that the above mentioned classification should be revised in the proposed way in order to cover the psychological constructions other than the verbal ones.
Key words: Argument structure, lexical semantics, verb semantics.
Keywords
References
- Aksan Y. and M. Aksan. 2005. Bileşik eylemler, sirali eylemler ve görünüş. In Sari, M. and H. Nas. 2005. XIX. Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri (398-413). Şanliurfa: Elif.
- Belleti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych verbs and theta theory. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 6, 291-352.
- Bouchard, D. 1995. The semantics of syntax. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Franklin, K. J. 1992. Using body part terms to begin a dictionary. Access date: 07.05.2009. www address: http://www.sil.org/ pacific/png/pubs/49648/Bodyparts_to_start_dict.pdf
- Hornby, M. S. 1983. Verb descriptivity in German and English. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
- İbe, Pinar. 2004. Psych verbs in Turkish: A structural and semantic analysis. Unpublished M.A. Dissertation. Mersin University, Mersin.
- Ruhi, Ş. 2002. Kültür araştirmalarinda dilbilimin yeri: Kültürel anahtar sözcük bakiş açisi. Dilbilim: Temel kavramlar, sorunlar, tartışmalar, 89-100. Ankara: Dil Derneği.
- TDK Türkçe Sözlük. 1998. Ankara: TDK Yayinlari.
- TDK İngilizce- Türkçe Sözlük. 1999. Ankara: TDK Yayinlari.
- Wierzbicka, Anna and Harkins, Jean. 2001. Emotions in crosslinguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Abstract
References
- Aksan Y. and M. Aksan. 2005. Bileşik eylemler, sirali eylemler ve görünüş. In Sari, M. and H. Nas. 2005. XIX. Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri (398-413). Şanliurfa: Elif.
- Belleti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych verbs and theta theory. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 6, 291-352.
- Bouchard, D. 1995. The semantics of syntax. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Franklin, K. J. 1992. Using body part terms to begin a dictionary. Access date: 07.05.2009. www address: http://www.sil.org/ pacific/png/pubs/49648/Bodyparts_to_start_dict.pdf
- Hornby, M. S. 1983. Verb descriptivity in German and English. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
- İbe, Pinar. 2004. Psych verbs in Turkish: A structural and semantic analysis. Unpublished M.A. Dissertation. Mersin University, Mersin.
- Ruhi, Ş. 2002. Kültür araştirmalarinda dilbilimin yeri: Kültürel anahtar sözcük bakiş açisi. Dilbilim: Temel kavramlar, sorunlar, tartışmalar, 89-100. Ankara: Dil Derneği.
- TDK Türkçe Sözlük. 1998. Ankara: TDK Yayinlari.
- TDK İngilizce- Türkçe Sözlük. 1999. Ankara: TDK Yayinlari.
- Wierzbicka, Anna and Harkins, Jean. 2001. Emotions in crosslinguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 1, 2011 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2010 Volume: 7 Issue: 2 |
