INVESTIGATION OF THE USABILITY OF RENEWABLE ENERGY IN MARITIME TRANSPORTATION

Abstract

One of the most important actors of maritime transport is cargo ships where cargo is transported. Nowadays, the expansion of the maritime trade volume with increasing acceleration, the increase in the size and quantity of ships in the world’s merchant navy fleet cause transportation costs to decrease per ton while to bring some negative effects such as air pollution. The major cause of ship-source air pollution is the conventional fuel used in propulsion systems. As of 2006, serious steps are being taken in the context of air pollution prevention measures that have been on the agenda in the sector on a global scale. In this study, recent academic literature conducted on this subject reviewed in recent years, renewable energy and other fuel types that can be used in efficiency equivalent to conventional fuel were evaluated. As a result of this thematic review, although the ship projects carried out with renewable energy in the project phase are exciting, the most powerful alternative in the short term seems liquefied natural gas (LNG) which is not accepted as renewable but found to be successful in terms of emissions. It can be used in ships with tonnage nearby coastal voyages, while in the offshore vessels which constitute the main emission problem; renewable energy is evaluated within the scope of additional measures that increase efficiency in the short term. In addition, as a fuel alternative, hydrogen is a candidate for future ship fuel in the medium and long term.

Keywords

• Renewable Energy,greenhouse gas,maritime,ship,LNG

References

1. Adams, S., Klobodu, E. K. M. ve Apio, A. (2018). Renewable and non-renewable energy, regime type and economic growth. Renewable Energy, 125, 755–767. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.135
2. Blazquez, J., Fuentes-Bracamontes, R., Bollino, C. A. and Nezamuddin, N. (2018). The renewable energy policy Paradox. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82(October 2017), 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.002
3. Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I. and Strømman, A. H. (2017). State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping – A review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 408–421. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
4. Breyer, C., Afanasyeva, S., Brakemeier, D., Engelhard, M., Giuliano, S., Puppe, M., Moser, M. (2017). Assessment of mid-term growth assumptions and learning rates for comparative studies of CSP and hybrid PV-battery power plants. AIP Conference Proceedings (C. 1850, s. 160001). AIP Publishing LLC. doi:10.1063/1.4984535
5. Burke, M. J. and Stephens, J. C. (2018). Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research and Social Science, 35(November 2017), 78–93. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
6. Cabrera, P., Lund, H. and Carta, J. A. (2018). Smart renewable energy penetration strategies on islands: The case of Gran Canaria. Energy, 162, 421–443. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.020
7. Calleya, J. N. (2014). Ship Design Decision Support for a Carbon Dioxide Constrained Future, 125.
8. Cames, M., Graichen, J., Siemons, A. and Cook, V. (2015). Emission Reduction Targets for International Aviation and Shipping. European Parliament - Policy Department, (1), 1–52. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/569964/IPOL_STU%282015%29569964_EN.pdf accessed from this website.

9. Chen, Y., Wang, Z. and Zhong, Z. (2019). CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renewable Energy, 131, 208–216. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.047
10. Chong, W. W. F. F., Ng, J. H., Rajoo, S. and Chong, C. T. (2018). Sector of Passenger transportation gasoline consumption due to friction in Southeast Asian countries. Energy Conversion and Management, 158 (November 2017), 346–358. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.083
11. Clean North Sea Shipping Project. (2014). Clean North Sea Shipping Final Report: Key Findings and Recommendations, (March), 92. http://cnss.no/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CNSS_Final_Report_web.pdf accessed from website.
12. Connolly, D., Mathiesen, B. V. and Ridjan, I. (2014). A comparison between renewable transport fuels that can supplement or replace biofuels in a 100% renewable energy system. Energy, 73, 110–125. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.104
13. Deniz, C. and Zincir, B. (2016). Environmental and economical assessment of alternative marine fuels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113(X), 438–449. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.089
14. DNV, (2015), DNV Annual report, 2015 https://issuu.com/dnvgl/docs/dnv_gl_annual_report_2015 Accessed 01.09.2019
15. DNV-GL, (2019), Maritime Impact report of Carbon Emissions, https://www.dnvgl.com/expert-story/maritime-impact/alternative-fuels.html , accessed 18.09.2019
16. Ertay, T., Kahraman, C. and Kaya, İ. (2013). Evaluation of Renewable Energy Alternatives Using Macbeth and Fuzzy Ahp Multicriteria Methods: The Case of Turkey. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(1), 38–62. doi:10.3846/20294913.2012.762950
17. Eyring, V., Köhler, H. W., Lauer, A. ve Lemper, B. (2005). Emissions from international shipping: 2. Impact of future technologies on scenarios until 2050. Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres, 110(17), 183–200. doi:10.1029/2004JD005620
18. Faber, J., Markowska, A., Nelissen, D., Davidson, M., Eyring, V., Cionni, I. Schwarz, W. (2009). Technical support for European action to reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from international maritime transport. Accessed from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/shipping/docs/ghg_ships_report_en.pdf.
19. Freese, N. (2017). International Maritime Shipping CO 2 Emissions CO2 Emissions from International Maritime Shipping-regulations, challenges and possibilities.
20. García-Olivares, A., Solé, J. and Osychenko, O. (2018). Transportation in a 100% renewable energy system. Energy Conversion and Management, 158(August 2017), 266–285. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.053
21. Haas, J., Nowak, W. ve Palma-Behnke, R. (2019). Multi-objective planning of energy storage technologies for a fully renewable system: Implications for the main stakeholders in Chile. Energy Policy, 126(December 2018), 494–506. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.034
22. Haifeng Wang ve Lutsey, N. (2013). Long-term potential for increased shipping efficiency through the adoption of industry-leading practices, (July), 32.
23. Hakan Pekşen, N., Pekşen, D. Y. ve Ölçer, A. (2014). Cold Ironing Yöntemi; Marport Limanı Uygulaması Shipping & Port Management 2. Journal of ETA Maritime Science Cold Ironing Yöntemi Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 2(1), 11–30. http://www.journalagent.com/jems/pdfs/JEMS_2_1_11_30.pdf accessed from website.
24. Hua, J., Cheng, C. W. ve Hwang, D. S. (2019). Total life cycle emissions of post-Panamax containerships powered by conventional fuel or natural gas. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 69(2), 131–144. doi:10.1080/10962247.2018.1505675
25. Hughes, E. (2016). Recent developments at IMO to address GHG emissions from ships. International Maritime Organization (IMO), (November). http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Pages/UN accessed from website.
26. IMarEST ve Colfax. (2015a). Making the Green Agenda Pay, 16.
27. IMarEST ve Colfax. (2015b). Making the Green Agenda Pay, 16. https://www.imarest.org/all-docman-documents/representation/green-agenda/551-making-the-green-agenda-pay/file accessed from website..
28. IMO. (2009). No Title. Environment, Marine Committee, Protection Of, Reduction Emissions, G H G Ships, From Abatement, Marginal Effectiveness, Cost Submitted, Energy-efficiency Measures Engineering, Marine, 61.
29. IMO. (2018). Note by the International Maritime Organization to the UNFCCC Talanoa Dialogue, (International Maritime Organisation), 27. Accessed from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/250_IMO
30. IMO, (2015) Control, A., Technologies, A., Reduce, T. O., Carbon, B., Shipping, I. (2015). IMO - Black Carbon. Accessed from www.imo.org.
31. (IMO, 2019) Air Pollution Prevention Regulations http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Pages/Sulphur-oxides-(SOx)-–-Regulation-14.aspx
32. IPCC. (2006). Volume 2: Energy - Chapter 2: Stationary Combustion, 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2.1 2.47. doi:10.1016/S0166-526X(06)47021-5
33. Jain, S. ve Jain, P. K. (2017). The rise of Renewable Energy implementation in South Africa. Energy Procedia, 143, 721–726. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.752
34. Kinto, O. T., De Oliveira Bernal, J. L., Veiga Gimenes, A. L. and Morales Udaeta, M. E. (2017). Sustainable Energy Technologies in the Industry Using Integrated Energy Resources Planning. Energy Procedia, 118, 4–14. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.002
35. Lindstad, H. E. (2014). Hydrogen the Next Maritime Fuel, 12pp. Lindstad, H., Eskeland, G. S., Psaraftis, H., Sandaas, I. ve Strømman, A. H. (2015). Maritime shipping and emissions: A three-layered, damage-based approach. Ocean Engineering, 110, 94–101. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.029
36. Mander, S. (2017). Slow steaming and a new dawn for wind propulsion: A multi-level analysis of two low carbon-shipping transitions. Marine Policy, 75, 210–216. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.018Maritime, G. ve Monitor, I. (2018). Global Maritime Issues Monit o r.
37. Matulić, N., Radica, G., Barbir, F. and Nižetić, S. (2019). Commercial vehicle auxiliary loads powered by PEM fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, (xxxx). doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.121
38. Michalski, J., Poltrum, M. ve Bünger, U. (2018). The role of renewable fuel supply in the transport sector in a future decarbonized energy system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.110
39. Mofor, L., Nuttal, P. ve Alison, N. (2015). Renewable energy: Options for scrutiny, (July).
40. Morsy El-Gohary, M. (2013). Overview of past, present and future marine power plants. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 12(2), 219–227. doi:10.1007/s11804-013-1188-8
41. Mosácula, C., Chaves-Ávila, J. P. ve Reneses, J. (2019). Reviewing the design of natural gas network charges considering regulatory principles as guiding criteria in the context of the increasing interrelation of energy carriers. Energy Policy, 126(December 2018), 545–557. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.069
42. Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770–779. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236
43. Pierru, A., Wu, K., Murphy, F., Galkin, P., Feijoo, F., Rioux, B.Malov, A. (2019). The economic impact of price controls on China’s natural gas supply chain. Energy Economics, 80(2019), 394–410. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.026
44. Psaraftis, H. N. (2016). Green Maritime Logistics: The Quest for Win-win Solutions. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 133–142. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.049Rahim, M. M., Islam, M. T. ve Kuruppu, S. (2016). Regulating global shipping corporations’ accountability for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the seas. Marine Policy, 69, 159–170. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.018
45. Rehmatulla, N., Calleya, J. and Smith, T. (2017). The implementation of technical energy efficiency and CO2 emission reduction measures in shipping. Ocean Engineering, 139 (June 2016), 184–197. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.029
46. Rehmatulla, N., Parker, S., Smith, T. and Stulgis, V. (2017). Wind technologies: Opportunities and barriers to a low carbon shipping industry. Marine Policy, 75, 217–226. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.021
47. Rehmatulla, N. and Smith, T. (2015). Barriers to energy efficient and low carbon shipping. Ocean Engineering, 110, 102–112. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.030
48. Robles Algarín, C., Llanos, A. P. and Castro, A. O. (2017). An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Evaluating Renewable Energy Sources. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy |, 7(4), 38–47. Accessed from http:www.econjournals.com.
49. Tanç, B., Arat, H. T., Baltacıoğlu, E. and Aydın, K. (2018). Overview of the next quarter century vision of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, (xxxx). doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.112
50. Technical, N. (2012). This document is downloaded from DR-NTU Nanyang Technological OPERATOR ’ S PERSPECTIVE IN THE CONTAINER SHIPPING.
51. Tronstad, T., Åstrand, H. H., Haugom, G. P. and Langfeldt, L. (2017). Study on the use of Fuel Cells in Shipping, 1–108.Wan, Z., el Makhloufi, A., Chen, Y. ve Tang, J. (2018). Decarbonizing the international shipping industry: Solutions and policy recommendations. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 126(December), 428–435. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.064
52. Wärtsilä. (2009). Boosting energy efficiency, (February), 1–68.
53. Xu, H., Li, Y. and Huang, H. (2017). Spatial Research on the Effect of Financial Structure on CO2 Emission. Energy Procedia, 118, 179–183. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.037
54. Zhang, Y., Lin, Z. ve Liu, Q. (2014). Marine renewable energy in China: Current status and perspectives. Water Science and Engineering, 7(3), 288–305. doi:10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2014.03.005