Milel ve Nihal

Publication Content
Milel ve Nihal Journal for Studies of Belief, Culture and Mythology contains original scientific publications. All published articles, except editorials and book reviews, are subject to a double blind peer review process.

Aim & Scope

Publication Content
Milel ve Nihal Journal for Studies of Belief, Culture and Mythology contains original scientific publications. All published articles, except editorials and book reviews, are subject to a double-blind peer review process.

Aim and Scope
Milel ve Nihal aims to publish interdisciplinary, scientifically important, original research articles, reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor in the fields of mythology, phenomenology, ethnology, archaeology and anthropology, especially History of Religions. Milel ve Nihal is an independent, double-blind peer-reviewed, open access and online journal. Articles should describe original data that have not been previously published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Articles deemed suitable for Milel ve Nihal submission rules and the scope of the journal are sent to at least two referees who are experts in their fields for scientific evaluation. The members of the Editorial Board of Milel ve Nihal discuss the suitability of the article and then take into account the comments of the referees on each submission. The final decision for all submitted articles belongs to the Editor-in-Chief. The Editorial Board of Milel ve Nihal Journal is committed to complying with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) criteria.

Subject Category:
Humanities:
- Religion and Theology (History of Religions, Mythology, Phenomenology of Religion)

Social and Behavioural Sciences:
- Cultural Studies
- Archaeology (Archaeology of Religion)
- Anthropology (Anthropology of Religion)
- Ethnology
Keywords: history of religions, mythology, anthropology, ethnology, phenomenology, archaeology

Publication Language
Full-Text Publication Language:
- Primary Language: Turkish
- Secondary Language: English

Content Written in English and Latin Alphabet:
- Article Title: Turkish & English
- Author Name: Turkish (in Latin Alphabet)
- Author Address: Turkish (in Latin Alphabet)
- Keywords: Turkish & English
- Bibliography: Turkish (in Latin alphabet)

Full Text: Turkish (in Latin Alphabet)

Article Submissions
Submitted articles should be appropriate to the purpose and scope of the journal. Original, unpublished articles that are not in the evaluation process in another journal and whose content and submission have been approved by each author are accepted for evaluation.

Readership
The target readership is members of professions, specialists, researchers, specialty and doctoral students as well as students related to this field in all areas of health. It aims to contribute to the spread of continuous professional development and research culture.

Price Policy
The publication of articles in the journal and the execution of article processes are not subject to any fee. No processing fee or submission fee is charged under any name for articles submitted to the journal or accepted for publication. Milel ve Nihal journal does not accept sponsorship and advertisement following its publication policies. All expenses of Milel ve Nihal magazine are covered by Milel ve Nihal: Association of Education, Culture, and Thought Platform.

Copyright
The copyrights of the works published in Milel ve Nihal Journal belong to their authors. Authors permit the intellectual work they submit to be published by Milel ve Nihal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence.

Originality of Articles
Milel ve Nihal does not accept papers previously published elsewhere. However, published articles in a foreign language may sometimes be accepted.

Article Preparation

Language: Turkish, English
The language of the journal is Turkish and English.

Article Types: Research article, review article, letter to the editor, book review
However, we advise the authors to make the work as concise as possible for dissemination.

Article Format: Word
Citation Style: ISNAD citation system

Author Change: Only processed before the article is accepted. Authors should carefully review the list and order of authors before submitting their article and provide the final author list at the time of original submission.

Writing Guidelines:
Click here for a sample article writing template.

Programme
Articles should preferably be written in or adapted to Microsoft Office Word (Word 97 or a more advanced version). The submitted articles should not exceed 7,000 words in total (book reviews, book reviews and short notes with academic content should not exceed 1500 words).

Page Layout
Articles should be prepared in A4 size in Microsoft Word. Margins should be 2.5 cm on all sides.

Abstract and Keywords
The submitted article should include both Turkish and English abstracts. Abstracts should not exceed 200 words. At least 3 and at most 5 keywords related to the article in Turkish and English should be included.

Format
Preferably Times New Roman font should be used in 10 pt. font in the text, and the same font should be used in 8 pt. font in footnotes and bibliography. 1.2 line spacing should be used for the text and single line spacing should be used for footnotes and references.
The first letters of the words in all headings and subheadings, including the title of the article, should be written in bold with the others in lower case.

Citation Style
- Articles should be prepared according to the ISNAD citation system.
- Click here to see examples of ISNAD citation and bibliography style.
- Footnotes should be shown at the bottom of the page. A bibliography should be added at the end of the article.
- Click here to see some abbreviations used in footnotes and bibliography.
- For the same sources shown for the second time in footnotes; only the surname or famous name of the author, the short name of the work, volume and page number should be written.
- In the names of Arabic works, the initials of the first word and proper names should be capitalised, the others should be written in lower case. In the names of works in Persian, English, etc. and other foreign languages and in Ottoman Turkish, the initials of each word should be capitalised.
- Verses should be given in the order of sura name, sura no/verse no ( e.g., al-Baqara, 2/10). In hadith works, the hadith number, if any, should be indicated. Quotations from other sacred texts should be given by book/chapter name, chapter number: sentence number ( e.g. Genesis, 1:3).

Visual Information
In articles, numerical values, statistical information, maps and visual products that are not made for the article and have no original value should not be used as much as possible; if necessary, such statistical information should be expressed with numerical values in the text form instead of coloured columns.

Acknowledgements
Anyone who supported the study other than authorship should be indicated at the end of the article text.

Final Checklist
It is hoped that this list will be useful during the final check of the article before it is uploaded to the journal system.

Make sure the following items are present:
1. Author information added.
- Email address
- Full postal address
- Phone number
2. All necessary files have been uploaded.
- Article text
3. The article has been "spell-checked" and "grammar-checked".
4. All references mentioned in the bibliography are cited in the text and vice versa.

Submit Article
The account of the corresponding author of the study should be used in the submissions. All correspondence regarding the application is sent to the corresponding author by e-mail sent through the journal system.
When uploading the article file, make sure that this file does not contain any elements that will decipher the identity of the author due to the double-blind review process.

Files You Need to Upload Separately:

• Full Article Text

During submission, the following commitment is obtained from the author electronically:
1. I am authorised/authorised by the co-authors to submit this work to your journal.
2. The article is original, has not been formally published in another peer-reviewed journal, is not under consideration by another journal, and does not violate any existing copyright or other third-party rights.
3. I/we agree that if the article is accepted for editorial publication, it will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence.
4. Copyright and intellectual property rights of the author(s) or, if applicable, the author(s)' employer are reserved. The author(s) undertake(s) that the publisher is not responsible for any claims or lawsuits to be filed by third parties due to copyright infringement, and that they bear full responsibility.
5. The author(s) undertake(s) that there are no criminal offences or illegal expressions in the article, and that no illegal materials and methods were used during the research.

AUTHOR'S GUIDELINE

Duties and Responsibilities of Authors

Authorship and Contribution
Authorship should be limited to those who made significant contributions to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the study. All significant contributors should be listed as co-authors. If there are minor contributors, e.g. language editing, they should be acknowledged in the acknowledgements section. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and agree to its submission for publication. Authors are expected to carefully review the list and order of authors before submitting their article and to provide the final author list at the time of original submission. Only in exceptional circumstances will the editor consider the addition, deletion, or reorganisation of authors after the article has been submitted. All authors must agree to any such addition, deletion or reorganisation. Authors take joint responsibility for the work.

Author Change Requests
Addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the author list can only be made before the article is accepted and only if approved by the Editor of the journal.
If such a change is requested, the Editor will request from the responsible author (a) the reason for the change in the author list and (b) written confirmation (e-mail) from all authors that they agree to the addition. Only in exceptional cases will the Editor consider the addition, deletion or reorganisation of authors after the article has been accepted.

Article Writing
Authors of original research papers should address the topic in an original way and with an objective discussion. The paper should include sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly false statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Authenticity
The author should provide assurance that the article is original, has not been previously published elsewhere, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in another language.

Using Original Sources and Citation
Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work and, if they have used the work or words of others, that this is properly cited. Privately obtained information, such as in conversations, correspondence or discussions with third parties, should not be used without the express written permission of the source.

Data Access and Preservation
Authors may be asked to provide research data supporting their articles for editorial review and/or to comply with the journal's open data requirements. Authors should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if possible, and to retain such data for a reasonable period after publication. The journal recommends uploading research data to TUBITAK's Aperta Portal.

Multiple and Simultaneous Publication
An author should not publish an article containing the same research in more than one journal. It is unethical to submit the same article to more than one journal at the same time. An author should not submit a previously published article for consideration in another journal, except in the form of an abstract.

Publication of Studies Based on Questionnaires and Interviews
For research in all disciplines that require ethics committee approval (ethics committee approval must be obtained, this approval must be stated and documented in the article. For researches requiring ethics committee approval, information about the approval (name of the committee, date and number) should be included in the method section and also on one of the first/last pages of the article; in case reports, information on the signature of the informed consent form should be included in the article.

Conflict of Interest
Any financial or other interest that may cause the person to be conflicted in his/her work, significantly impair his/her objectivity, or provide an unfair advantage in favour of any person or organisation. All sources of financial support received during the conduct of the research and preparation of the article and the role of sponsors in the study should be explained. If there is no source of funding, this should also be indicated. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that should be disclosed include consultancies, salaries, grants. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest possible stage.

Error Reporting
When an author notices a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her published work, he/she should notify the journal immediately. It is also the author's obligation to co-operate in withdrawing or correcting the article if deemed necessary by the editor. If the editor or publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains errors, it is the author's obligation to co-operate with the editor, including informing the editor.

Image Integrity
It is unacceptable to enhance, darken, move, remove or add a specific feature in an image. Authors must adhere to the policy for graphic images implemented by the journal.

Publication Ethics Principles
Publication Ethics can be defined as a self-regulatory mechanism that insists on integrity on behalf of authors, referees and publishers to establish higher standards of editorial processing. Ethical standards for publication exist to ensure high-quality scientific publications, public confidence in scientific findings, and respect for people's opinions.
• Honest researchers do not plagiarise.
• They do not misattribute sources.
• They do not hide objections they cannot refute.
• They do not distort opposing views.
• They do not destroy or hide data.

Peer-reviewed studies are studies that support and realise the scientific method. At this point, it is of great importance that all parties involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publisher, referees and editors) comply with ethical principles. The Journal of Milel ve Nihal adheres to national and international standards in research and publication ethics. It complies with the Press Law, the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works and the Directive on Scientific Research and Publication Ethics of Higher Education Institutions. Milel ve Nihal has adopted the International Ethical Publishing Principles published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA). It also undertakes to comply with the decisions of the Turkish Editors' Workshop.

• Press Law
• Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works
• Higher Education Institutions Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive
• Transparency and Best Practice Principles in Academic Publishing
• Turkey Editors' Workshop Decisions

Republishing
Republishing is the publication of the same article or substantially similar articles in more than one journal. The editor sends such an article back without reviewing it. Thereafter, the editor may impose an embargo for a certain period of time on the author who has attempted to republish, publicise this situation in the journal in which the author has previously published (perhaps by simultaneous announcement with the editor of the journal that published the previous article), or apply all of these measures together.

Simultaneous submission of the same work to more than one journal
Authors may not submit the same article to more than one journal at the same time. If the editor learns of possible simultaneous submission, he/she reserves the right to consult with the other editor(s) receiving the article. In addition, the editor may return the article without review or reject the article without considering the reviews, or take this decision in discussion with the other editor(s) involved, and may decide not to accept submissions from authors for a certain period of time. It may also write to the authors' employers or take all of these measures together.

Control to Prevent Plagiarism
Plagiarism is presenting the ideas, methods, data, applications, writings, figures or works of others as one's own work, in whole or in part, without citing the authors in accordance with scientific rules.
Milel ve Nihal scans all submitted articles to prevent plagiarism. The studies submitted for review are checked for plagiarism using Ithenticate software. The similarity rate is expected to be less than 20%. The main measure of similarity is the author's compliance with the rules of citation and citation. If the similarity rate is 1%, but citation and quotation are not done properly, plagiarism may still be in question. In this respect, citation and quotation rules should be known and carefully applied by the author: İSNAD
Plagiarism, duplication, pseudo-authorship/ denied authorship, research/data fabrication, article slicing, sliced publication, copyright infringement and concealment of conflict of interest are considered unethical behaviours. All articles that do not comply with accepted ethical standards are removed from publication. This includes articles containing possible irregularities and non-conformities detected after publication.

Forgery
To produce data that is not based on research, to edit or change the work presented or published on the basis of unreal data, to report or publish them, to show a research that has not been done as if it has been done.
Falsifying research records and data obtained, showing methods, devices and materials that were not used in the research as if they were used, not evaluating data that do not comply with the research hypothesis, manipulating data and/or results to fit the relevant theory or assumptions, falsifying or shaping the research results in line with the interests of the persons and organisations supported.

Protection of Personal Data of Participants
Milel ve Nihal requires that all research involving personal or sensitive data or materials relating to human participants that are not legally available to the public be subject to formal ethical review.

Handling Allegations of Research Misconduct
Milel ve Nihal follows COPE's Ethical Toolkit for a Successful Editorial. Milel ve Nihal editors will take measures to prevent the publication of articles in which plagiarism, citation manipulation, data falsification, data fabrication, and other research misconduct occur. In no case will Milel ve Nihal editors knowingly allow such misconduct to occur. If Milel ve Nihal editors become aware of any allegations of research misconduct related to an article published in their journal, they will follow COPE's guidelines regarding allegations.

Addressing Allegations of Research Misconduct
Milel ve Nihal follows COPE's Ethical Toolkit for a Successful Editorial. Milel ve Nihal editors will take measures to prevent the publication of articles in which plagiarism, citation manipulation, data falsification, data fabrication, and other research misconduct occur. In no case will Milel ve Nihal editors knowingly allow such misconduct to occur. If Milel ve Nihal editors are aware of any allegations of research misconduct related to an article published in their journal, they will follow COPE's guidelines regarding allegations.

Ethical Violation Notifications
Readers can send an e-mail to dergi@milelvenihal.org when they notice a significant error or inaccuracy in an article published in Milel ve Nihal or have any complaints about the editorial content (plagiarism, duplicate articles, etc.). We welcome applications as it will provide an opportunity for us to improve, and we will respond quickly and constructively.
Correction, Retraction, Expression of Concern
Editors may consider publishing a correction if minor errors are detected in the published article that do not affect the findings, interpretations and conclusions. Editors should consider retracting the article if there are major errors/violations that invalidate the findings and conclusions. Editors should consider issuing a statement of concern if there is a possibility of research or publication misconduct by the authors; if there is evidence that the findings are unreliable and the authors' institutions have not investigated the incident; or if the possible investigation seems unfair or inconclusive. COPE guidelines regarding correction, retraction or expression of concern are taken into account.

Publication of Studies Based on Surveys and Interviews
Milel ve Nihal adopts the "Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" and "Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers" principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in order to provide ethical assurance in scientific periodical publishing. In this context, the following points should be complied with in the studies submitted to the journal:
1) For research in all disciplines that require ethics committee approval (ethics committee approval must be obtained, this approval must be stated and documented in the article.
2) In studies requiring ethics committee authorisation, information about the authorisation (name of the committee, date and number) should be included in the method section and on one of the first/last pages of the article; in case reports, information on the signature of the informed consent form should be included in the article.
Special Issue Publication Policy
A special issue can be published once a year upon the request of the Editorial Board. Articles submitted for inclusion in the special issue are first subjected to a preliminary editorial review. Then, they are examined for compliance with the journal's spelling rules and similarity screening is performed to prevent plagiarism. After these stages, they are included in the peer review process using the double-blinding model.

Editorial Confidentiality Obligation
The editors of Milel ve Nihal treat all submitted articles as confidential documents, which means that they will not disclose information about a article to anyone without the authors' permission. During the article review process, the following people have access to the articles: Editors, Referees, Editorial Board Members. The only situation where details about a article may be passed to a third party without the authors' permission is if the editor suspects serious research misconduct.

Allegations-Suspicions of Scientific Misconduct
There are different definitions of scientific misconduct. As Milel ve Nihal , we address these issues on a case-by-case basis while following the guidance established by major publication ethics bodies. The editor is obliged to take action if he/she suspects or alleges an ethical violation. This duty extends to both published and unpublished articles. The editor should not simply reject articles raising concerns about possible misconduct. He/she is ethically obliged to follow up on alleged cases. The editor should follow COPE flowcharts when appropriate. Editors should first seek a response from those suspected of misconduct. If they are not satisfied with the response, they should ask the relevant employer or organisation to investigate. The editor should make all reasonable endeavours to ensure that an appropriate investigation into the alleged misconduct is carried out; if this fails, the editor should make all reasonable attempts to insist on a resolution to the problem. This is an arduous but important task.
Milel ve Nihal follows COPE's "Ethics toolkit for a successful editorial office". The editors will take measures to prevent the publication of articles in which plagiarism, citation manipulation, data falsification, data fabrication, and other research misconduct occur. Under no circumstances will Milel ve Nihal or its editors knowingly allow such misconduct to occur. In the event that Milel ve Nihal editors become aware of any allegations of research misconduct related to an article published in their journal, they will follow COPE's guidelines regarding allegations.

Referees should inform the Editor if they suspect misconduct in the research or publication. The Editor is responsible for taking necessary action in accordance with COPE recommendations.

Milel ve Nihal is committed to following the COPE flowcharts when faced with allegations of misconduct on the following or similar issues.
• What to do when republication is suspected
• What to do when plagiarism is suspected
• What to do if fabricated data is suspected
• Requests for change of authorship
• What to do if an undisclosed conflict of interest is suspected
• What to do if unfair or gift authorship is suspected
• What to do when an ethical problem is suspected in an article
• What to do when the suspicion of ethical violation is directly notified by e-mail, etc.
• What to do when a suspected ethical violation is announced via social media

Complaint Procedure
This procedure applies to complaints about content, procedures or policies that are the responsibility of Milel ve Nihal or our editorial staff. Complaints can provide an opportunity and incentive for improvement and we aim to respond quickly, courteously and constructively.

The complaint must relate to content, procedures or policies that are the responsibility of Milel ve Nihal or our editorial team. Complaints should be emailed directly to dergi@milelvenihal.org and will be treated confidentially. The editor responds to complaints immediately. The editor follows the procedure outlined in the COPE flowchart regarding complaints.
Complaints are reviewed by the relevant member of the editorial team and, if not resolved, the following processes are followed:
• If this initial response is considered inadequate, the complainant may request that the complaint be forwarded to a more senior member of the journal.
• If the complainant is not satisfied, the complaint may be forwarded to the editor-in-chief.
• If possible, a full response will be given within two weeks.
COPE publishes a code of practice for editors of scientific journals. This should facilitate the resolution of disputes with editors, journals and publishers, but only after the journal's own complaints procedures have been exhausted.

Appeal Process
We welcome serious objections to the evaluations made by editors and referees. If you feel that we have rejected your paper because we misunderstood its scientific content, please send an appeal message to our editorial team at dergi@milelvenihal.org. Do not attempt to submit a revised version of your article at this stage. If, after reading your appeal letter, we realise that your appeal is justified, we may invite you to submit a revised version of your article. Your article will then be resubmitted to the external referee process. Please include as much detail as possible in the appeal letter. Finally, we can only consider one appeal per article, so please take the time and effort to write the letter in detail to make your appeal clear - you have one chance, so use it well. We have found that prolonged deliberation over rejected papers is often unsatisfactory for both authors and editors, so we do not process multiple appeals for the same paper.

Conflicts of Interest
A conflict of interest arises when professional judgement about a primary interest may be influenced by a secondary interest (such as financial gain or personal competition). We believe that we need to know the authors' competing interests in order to make the best judgement about how to handle an article, and that readers should know them if we publish the article.
Any interest, financial or otherwise, which may cause one to be conflicted in one's work, significantly impair one's objectivity, or give an unfair advantage in favour of any person or organisation. All sources of financial support received during the conduct of the research and preparation of the article and the role of sponsors in the study should be disclosed. If there is no source of funding, this should also be indicated. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that should be disclosed include consultancies, salaries, grants. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest possible stage.
Milel ve Nihal has a set process for handling submissions from editors, staff or editorial board members to ensure impartial review. Such submissions are first referred to other journals. If this is not possible, the owner of the submission is suspended from the journal. These submissions are reviewed in a double blind process.
The editor should not be involved in decisions about articles written by him/herself or family members. Furthermore, such a paper should be subject to all the usual procedures of the journal. The editor should follow COPE guidelines on the disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by authors and referees.

Principles of Research Ethics
Milel ve Nihal observes the highest standards in research ethics and adopts the international research ethics principles defined below. It is the responsibility of the authors to ensure that the articles comply with ethical rules.
• The principles of integrity, quality and transparency should be ensured in the design, review of the design and conduct of the research.
• The research team and participants should be fully informed about the purpose of the research, its methods and possible uses; the requirements and risks, if any, of participation in the research.
• Confidentiality of information provided by research participants and confidentiality of respondents must be ensured. The research should be designed to protect the autonomy and dignity of the participants.
• Research participants should take part in the research voluntarily and should not be under any coercion.
• Harm to the participants should be avoided. The research should be planned in a way that does not put the participants at risk.
• Research independence must be clear and explicit; if there is a conflict of interest, it must be stated.
• In experimental studies with human subjects, the written informed consent of the participants who decide to participate in the research must be obtained. The consent of the legal guardian of children and those under guardianship or those with a recognised mental illness must be obtained.
• If the study will be carried out in any institution or organisation, approval must be obtained from this institution or organisation that the study will be conducted.
• In studies with a human element, it should be stated in the "method" section that "informed consent" has been obtained from the participants and ethics committee approval has been obtained from the institution where the study is conducted.

No fee is paid to the authors for the articles published in the journal. The publication of articles in the journal and the execution of article processes are not subject to any fee. No processing fee or submission fee is charged under any name for articles submitted to the journal or accepted for publication. Milel ve Nihal journal does not accept sponsorship and advertisement in accordance with its publication policies. All expenses of Milel ve Nihal are covered by Milel ve Nihal Association of Education, Culture and Thought Platform.