Solidification of tannery sludge with various binders

Year 2022, , 187 - 193, 31.12.2022

Feride Ulu

https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.1159967

Abstract

The treatment of tannery sludge is an issue that has received considerable attention due to the potential of tannery sludge to cause severe environmental damage. In this study, the solidification process of the waste sludge of the Istanbul Tannery Organize Industry Wastewater Treatment Plant was investigated for safe disposal. The solidification technique was applied using various binders and their different mixtures, such as active carbon, gypsum (CaSO4/2H2O), fly ash, lime (CaO), zeolite, and different cement-sand mixtures on the laboratory scale. The essential parameters such as TOC, fluoride (F- mg/l), chloride (Cl- mg/l), sulfate (SO4= mg/l), chromium (VI) (Cr6+ mg/l), and ammonium (NH4+ mg/l) were determined after solidification process at certain conditions. The analysis results of treated sludge samples were compared to the criteria for storage in the landfills in the Hazardous Waste Control Regulation (HWCR) as well as cost-calculation was done at optimum conditions. After the addition of 10% wt. CaSO4 in the solidification study, the eluate concentration of TOC, Cl- and SO4= was below the limit values. When tannery sludge was solidified using CaO, the necessary criteria could not be obtained. On the other hand, with the addition of 33% CaO and 5% AC mixture TOC and AOX were observed below the limit values. The solidification was occured with mörtel + portland cement and 5% activated carbon additives and the desired limit values in HWCR were succussed for all parameters. Besides, with the addition of 30% zeolite, all parameters declined below the limit values.

Keywords

Tannery sludge, tannery industry, solidification, stabilization.

References

• [1] Jallouli S., Wali A., Buonerba A., Zarra T., Belgiorno V., Naddeo V., & Ksibi M. “Efficient and sustainable treatment of tannery wastewater by a sequential electrocoagulation-UV photolytic process”. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 38, (2020), 101642.
• [2] Mia A. S., Ahmad F., Rahman M. “Adsorption of chromium (Cr) from tannery wastewater using low-cost spent tea leaves adsorbent”. Applied Water Science, (2018), 8(5), 1-7.
• [3] Zou X., Ma F., Yu J., Su Q., Gai L., Zhao W., & Xiao, S. “Pilot-scale Study on Removal of Pollutants in Tannery Wastewater and Sludge Reduction by Biological Synergist Effect”. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 546 (3), (2020), 032041. IOP Publishing.
• [4] Tran L. L., Tran T. T., Nguyen B. D., & Nguyen T. T. P. “Study of the treatment of tannery wastewater after biological pretreatment by using electrochemical oxidation on BDD/Ti anode”. Desalination and Water Treatment, 137, (2019), 194-201.
• [5] Isari, A. A., Mehregan M., Mehregan S., Hayati F., Kalantary R. R., & Kakavandi, B. “Sono-photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline and pharmaceutical wastewater using WO3/CNT heterojunction nanocomposite under US and visible light irradiations: a novel hybrid system”. Journal of hazardous materials, 390, (2020), 122050.
• [6] Rodriguez J., Ochando-Pulido J. M., & Martinez-Ferez A. “The effect of pH in tannery wastewater by Fenton vs. heterogeneous Fenton process”. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 73, (2019), 205- 210.
• [7] Mohammed K., Sahu O. “Recovery of chromium from tannery industry waste water by membrane separation technology: health and engineering aspects”. Science African, 4, (2019), e00096.
• [8] Juel, M. A. I., Chowdhury, Z. U. M., & Ahmed, T. (2016, July). Heavy metal speciation and toxicity characteristics of tannery sludge. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1754 (1),(2016), 060009. AIP Publishing LLC.
• [9] Mpofu A. B., Welz P. J., & Oyekola, O. O. “Anaerobic digestion of secondary tannery sludge: optimisation of initial pH and temperature and evaluation of kinetics”. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11(3), (2020), 873-885.
• [10] Kokkinos E., Proskynitopoulou V., & Zouboulis A. “Chromium and energy recovery from tannery wastewater treatment waste: Investigation of major mechanisms in the framework of circular economy”. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 7(5), (2019), 103307.
• [11] Alibardi L., & Cossu R. “Pre-treatment of tannery sludge for sustainable landfilling”. Waste Management, 52, (2016), 202-211.
• [12] Pietrelli L., Ippolito N., Reverberi, A., & Vocciante, M. “Heavy metals removal and recovery from hazardous leather sludge”. Chemical Engineering, 76, (2019).
• [13] Arthy M., & Phanikumar B. R. “Solidification/stabilization of tannery sludge with iron-based nanoparticles and nano-biocomposites. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(4), (2017), 1-17.
• [14] Lin H., Zeng L., Zhang P., Jiao B., Shiau Y., & Li D. “Solidification of chromium-containing sludge with attapulgite combined alkali slag”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), (2022), 13580-13591.
• [15] Montañés M. T., Sánchez-Tovar R., & Roux M. S. “The effectiveness of the stabilization/solidification process on the leachability and toxicity of the tannery sludge chromium”. Journal of Environmental Management, 143, (2014), 71-79.
• [16] Jayasankar R., & Mohan S. “Experimental studies on solidification and stabilization of tannery sludge”. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 6(4), (2018), 856-864.
• [17] Pantazopoulou E., Zebiliadou O., Mitrakas M., & Zouboulis A. “Stabilization of tannery sludge by co-treatment with aluminum anodizing sludge and phytotoxicity of end-products”. Waste Management, 61, (2017), 327-336.
• [18] DIN 38 414 S4, German Standard Methods for Researching Water, Effluent Water and Sludge, Group S: Sludge and Sediments; Determining Leaching with Water (S4), (1984).
• [19] Rodger B., and Bridgewater L. “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 23rd edition”. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association, (2017).
• [20] Juel Md A. I., Stabilization of Tannery Sludge Through Brick Production, Department of Civil Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, (2016).