Research Article

An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation

Volume: 13 Number: 1 June 27, 2025
EN

An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation

Abstract

Population growth and urbanization have significantly affected the energy demand and environmental contaminant levels worldwide. Currently, global warming with greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, acid rain, environmental degradation, and depletion of energy resources are all consequences of utilizing fossil fuel-powered energy infrastructure. Hence, renewable energy-powered alternative energy resources must be considered to minimize atmospheric emissions and environmental contaminants. Hydrogen (H2) has become a viable fuel to satisfy energy needs, and in recent years, there has been a lot of interest in green H2 production, particularly using electrolysis processes that produce no emissions. In this regard, this paper utilized the atmospheric emission assessment software to evaluate atmospheric contaminants from the alkaline electrolysis (AE), proton exchange membrane-based electrolysis (PEM), and solid oxide electrolysis (SOE) processes. Among these processes, the highest CO2 emission comes from the PEM electrolysis process, accounting for 4.68 kg-CO2/kg-H2, while the AE process provides the minimum total CO2 emissions of 3.28 kg-CO2/kg-H2. A similar trend was observed in the particulate matter (PM) emissions, and the PM2.5 emissions were 1.36, 1.30, and 1.24 kg-PM2.5/kg-H2 for PEM, SOE, and AE processes, respectively. Moreover, the environmental impact parameters of the processes were assessed, and the lowest global warming potential (GWP) of 3.32 kgCO2-eq./kg-H2 was obtained for the AE process. Accordingly, these results demonstrated that energy production techniques may be completely environmentally sustainable by substituting fully sustainable resources for the energy sources employed in current H2 production methods.

Keywords

Atmospheric contaminants, electrolysis, hydrogen production, sustainability, environmental assessment

References

  1. [1] J. Turner, G. Sverdrup, M.K. Mann, P. Maness, B. Kroposki, M. Ghirardi, R.J. Evans, D. Blake, Renewable hydrogen production, Int. J. Energy Res. 32 (2008) 379–407.
  2. [2] F. Suleman, I. Dincer, M. Agelin-Chaab, Environmental impact assessment and comparison of some hydrogen production options, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 40 (2015) 6976–6987.
  3. [3] I. Dincer, C. Acar, Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 40 (2015) 11094–11111.
  4. [4] A.Y. Goren, I. Dincer, A. Khalvati, A Comprehensive Review on Environmental and Economic Impacts of Hydrogen Production from Traditional and Cleaner Resources, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. (2023) 111187.
  5. [5] M. David, C. Ocampo-Martínez, R. Sánchez-Peña, Advances in alkaline water electrolyzers: A review, J. Energy Storage. 23 (2019) 392– 403.
  6. [6] Y. Zhu, Y. Zhang, S. Bin, Z. Chen, F. Zhang, S. Gong, Y. Xia, X. Duan, Effects of key design and operating parameters on the performance of the PEM water electrolysis for hydrogen production, Renew. Energy. (2024) 121290.
  7. [7] L. Järvinen, P. Puranen, V. Ruuskanen, A. Kosonen, P. Kauranen, J. Ahola, C. Chatzichristodoulou, Experimental study of alkaline water electrolyzer performance and frequency behavior under high frequency dynamic operation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 67 (2024) 50–61.
  8. [8] L.A. Jolaoso, C. Duan, P. Kazempoor, Life cycle analysis of a hydrogen production system based on solid oxide electrolysis cells integrated with different energy and wastewater sources, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 52 (2024) 485–501.
  9. [9] R.K. Iyer, J.H. Prosser, J.C. Kelly, B.D. James, A. Elgowainy, Life-cycle analysis of hydrogen production from water electrolyzers, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 81 (2024) 1467–1478.
  10. [10] Y. Kim, I. Min, J. Lee, H. Yang, An Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Electrolysis for Certifying Clean Hydrogen., Energies (19961073). 17 (2024).
APA
Gören, A. Y. (2025). An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MANAS Journal of Engineering, 13(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.1584061
AMA
1.Gören AY. An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MJEN. 2025;13(1):40-51. doi:10.51354/mjen.1584061
Chicago
Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur. 2025. “An Atmospheric Impact Assessment of Water-Based Hydrogen Production Methods: Sustainability Evaluation”. MANAS Journal of Engineering 13 (1): 40-51. https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.1584061.
EndNote
Gören AY (June 1, 2025) An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MANAS Journal of Engineering 13 1 40–51.
IEEE
[1]A. Y. Gören, “An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation”, MJEN, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 40–51, June 2025, doi: 10.51354/mjen.1584061.
ISNAD
Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur. “An Atmospheric Impact Assessment of Water-Based Hydrogen Production Methods: Sustainability Evaluation”. MANAS Journal of Engineering 13/1 (June 1, 2025): 40-51. https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.1584061.
JAMA
1.Gören AY. An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MJEN. 2025;13:40–51.
MLA
Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur. “An Atmospheric Impact Assessment of Water-Based Hydrogen Production Methods: Sustainability Evaluation”. MANAS Journal of Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, June 2025, pp. 40-51, doi:10.51354/mjen.1584061.
Vancouver
1.Ayşegül Yağmur Gören. An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MJEN. 2025 Jun. 1;13(1):40-51. doi:10.51354/mjen.1584061