Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 40 - 51, 27.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.1584061

Abstract

References

  • [1] J. Turner, G. Sverdrup, M.K. Mann, P. Maness, B. Kroposki, M. Ghirardi, R.J. Evans, D. Blake, Renewable hydrogen production, Int. J. Energy Res. 32 (2008) 379–407.
  • [2] F. Suleman, I. Dincer, M. Agelin-Chaab, Environmental impact assessment and comparison of some hydrogen production options, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 40 (2015) 6976–6987.
  • [3] I. Dincer, C. Acar, Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 40 (2015) 11094–11111.
  • [4] A.Y. Goren, I. Dincer, A. Khalvati, A Comprehensive Review on Environmental and Economic Impacts of Hydrogen Production from Traditional and Cleaner Resources, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. (2023) 111187.
  • [5] M. David, C. Ocampo-Martínez, R. Sánchez-Peña, Advances in alkaline water electrolyzers: A review, J. Energy Storage. 23 (2019) 392– 403.
  • [6] Y. Zhu, Y. Zhang, S. Bin, Z. Chen, F. Zhang, S. Gong, Y. Xia, X. Duan, Effects of key design and operating parameters on the performance of the PEM water electrolysis for hydrogen production, Renew. Energy. (2024) 121290.
  • [7] L. Järvinen, P. Puranen, V. Ruuskanen, A. Kosonen, P. Kauranen, J. Ahola, C. Chatzichristodoulou, Experimental study of alkaline water electrolyzer performance and frequency behavior under high frequency dynamic operation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 67 (2024) 50–61.
  • [8] L.A. Jolaoso, C. Duan, P. Kazempoor, Life cycle analysis of a hydrogen production system based on solid oxide electrolysis cells integrated with different energy and wastewater sources, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 52 (2024) 485–501.
  • [9] R.K. Iyer, J.H. Prosser, J.C. Kelly, B.D. James, A. Elgowainy, Life-cycle analysis of hydrogen production from water electrolyzers, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 81 (2024) 1467–1478.
  • [10] Y. Kim, I. Min, J. Lee, H. Yang, An Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Electrolysis for Certifying Clean Hydrogen., Energies (19961073). 17 (2024).
  • [11] J. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. He, M. Li, X. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Zhu, K. Cen, Comparison of onshore/offshore wind power hydrogen production through water electrolysis by life cycle assessment, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments. 60 (2023) 103515.
  • [12] X. Wei, S. Sharma, A. Waeber, D. Wen, S.N. Sampathkumar, M. Margni, F. Maréchal, Comparative life cycle analysis of electrolyzer technologies for hydrogen production: Manufacturing and operations, Joule. (2024).
  • [13] O. Siddiqui, I. Dincer, A well to pump life cycle environmental impact assessment of some hydrogen production routes, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 44 (2019) 5773–5786.
  • [14] C. Zhang, J.B. Greenblatt, M. Wei, J. Eichman, S. Saxena, M. Muratori, O.J. Guerra, Flexible grid-based electrolysis hydrogen production for fuel cell vehicles reduces costs and greenhouse gas emissions, Appl. Energy. 278 (2020) 115651.
  • [15] C.A. Grimes, O.K. Varghese, S. Ranjan, Light, water, hydrogen: the solar generation of hydrogen by water photoelectrolysis, Springer, 2008.
  • [16] A. Manabe, M. Kashiwase, T. Hashimoto, T. Hayashida, A. Kato, K. Hirao, I. Shimomura, I. Nagashima, Basic study of alkaline water electrolysis, Electrochim. Acta. 100 (2013) 249–256.
  • [17] P. Lerch, F. Scheller, D.G. Reichelt, K. Menzel, T. Bruckner, Electricity cost and CO2 savings potential for chlor-alkali electrolysis plants: Benefits of electricity price dependent demand response, Appl. Energy. 355 (2024) 122263.
  • [18] A. Jun, J. Kim, J. Shin, G. Kim, Achieving high efficiency and eliminating degradation in solid oxide electrochemical cells using high oxygen‐capacity perovskite, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 12512– 12515.
  • [19] J. Laurencin, J. Mougin, High‐Temperature Steam Electrolysis, Hydrog. Prod. Electrolysis. (2015) 191–272.
  • [20] A. Brisse, J. Schefold, M. Zahid, High temperature water electrolysis in solid oxide cells, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 33 (2008) 5375–5382.
  • [21] L.J. Nuttall, A.P. Fickett, W.A. Titterington, Hydrogen generation by solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis, Hydrog. Energy Part A. (1975) 441–455.
  • [22] B. Yang, Z. Zhang, S. Su, J. Li, J. Wang, R. Zhang, H. Shu, Y. Ren, L. Jiang, Y. Sang, Optimal scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydrogen system with alkaline and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, J. Power Sources. 614 (2024) 235010.
  • [23] S.E. Haque, Historical perspectives on climate change and its influence on nature, in: Vis. Tech. Clim. Chang. with Mach. Learn. Artif. Intell., Elsevier, 2023: pp. 15–38.
  • [24] R. Bhandari, C.A. Trudewind, P. Zapp, Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via electrolysis–a review, J. Clean. Prod. 85 (2014) 151–163.
  • [25] J. Zhang, B. Ling, Y. He, Y. Zhu, Z. Wang, Life cycle assessment of three types of hydrogen production methods using solar energy, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 47 (2022) 14158–14168.
  • [26] H.-Y. Chen, J.-C. Jeng, Integration of hydrogen production and greenhouse gas treatment by utilizing nitrogen oxide as sweep gas in a solid oxide electrolysis cell, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 130 (2022) 103937.
  • [27] K.O. Denisova, A.A. Ilyin, R.N. Rumyantsev, A.P. Ilyin, A. V Volkova, Nitrous oxide: Production, application, and protection of the environment, Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 89 (2019) 1338–1346.
  • [28] C. Bauer, K. Treyer, C. Antonini, J. Bergerson, M. Gazzani, E. Gencer, J. Gibbins, M. Mazzotti, S.T. McCoy, R. McKenna, On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production, Sustain. Energy Fuels. 6 (2022) 66–75.
  • [29] Y.A. Alhamdani, M.H. Hassim, R.T.L. Ng, M. Hurme, The estimation of fugitive gas emissions from hydrogen production by natural gas steam reforming, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 9342–9351.
  • [30] W.G. Tucker, An overview of PM2. 5 sources and control strategies, Fuel Process. Technol. 65 (2000) 379–392.
  • [31] C.I. Davidson, R.F. Phalen, P.A. Solomon, Airborne particulate matter and human health: a review, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 737–749.
  • [32] F. Fallahpour, A. Aminghafouri, A. Ghalegolab Behbahani, M. Bannayan, The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, Environ. Dev. Sustain. 14 (2012) 979–992.
  • [33] Y. Zhou, D. Swidler, S. Searle, C. Baldino, Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biomethane and hydrogen pathways in the European Union, (2021).
  • [34] A.D. La Rosa, Life cycle assessment of biopolymers, in: Biopolym. Biotech Admixtures Eco-Efficient Constr. Mater., Elsevier, 2016: pp. 57–78

An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 40 - 51, 27.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.1584061

Abstract

Population growth and urbanization have significantly affected the energy demand and environmental contaminant levels worldwide. Currently, global warming with greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, acid rain, environmental degradation, and depletion of energy resources are all consequences of utilizing fossil fuel-powered energy infrastructure. Hence, renewable energy-powered alternative energy resources must be considered to minimize atmospheric emissions and environmental contaminants. Hydrogen (H2) has become a viable fuel to satisfy energy needs, and in recent years, there has been a lot of interest in green H2 production, particularly using electrolysis processes that produce no emissions. In this regard, this paper utilized the atmospheric emission assessment software to evaluate atmospheric contaminants from the alkaline electrolysis (AE), proton exchange membrane-based electrolysis (PEM), and solid oxide electrolysis (SOE) processes. Among these processes, the highest CO2 emission comes from the PEM electrolysis process, accounting for 4.68 kg-CO2/kg-H2, while the AE process provides the minimum total CO2 emissions of 3.28 kg-CO2/kg-H2. A similar trend was observed in the particulate matter (PM) emissions, and the PM2.5 emissions were 1.36, 1.30, and 1.24 kg-PM2.5/kg-H2 for PEM, SOE, and AE processes, respectively. Moreover, the environmental impact parameters of the processes were assessed, and the lowest global warming potential (GWP) of 3.32 kgCO2-eq./kg-H2 was obtained for the AE process. Accordingly, these results demonstrated that energy production techniques may be completely environmentally sustainable by substituting fully sustainable resources for the energy sources employed in current H2 production methods.

References

  • [1] J. Turner, G. Sverdrup, M.K. Mann, P. Maness, B. Kroposki, M. Ghirardi, R.J. Evans, D. Blake, Renewable hydrogen production, Int. J. Energy Res. 32 (2008) 379–407.
  • [2] F. Suleman, I. Dincer, M. Agelin-Chaab, Environmental impact assessment and comparison of some hydrogen production options, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 40 (2015) 6976–6987.
  • [3] I. Dincer, C. Acar, Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 40 (2015) 11094–11111.
  • [4] A.Y. Goren, I. Dincer, A. Khalvati, A Comprehensive Review on Environmental and Economic Impacts of Hydrogen Production from Traditional and Cleaner Resources, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. (2023) 111187.
  • [5] M. David, C. Ocampo-Martínez, R. Sánchez-Peña, Advances in alkaline water electrolyzers: A review, J. Energy Storage. 23 (2019) 392– 403.
  • [6] Y. Zhu, Y. Zhang, S. Bin, Z. Chen, F. Zhang, S. Gong, Y. Xia, X. Duan, Effects of key design and operating parameters on the performance of the PEM water electrolysis for hydrogen production, Renew. Energy. (2024) 121290.
  • [7] L. Järvinen, P. Puranen, V. Ruuskanen, A. Kosonen, P. Kauranen, J. Ahola, C. Chatzichristodoulou, Experimental study of alkaline water electrolyzer performance and frequency behavior under high frequency dynamic operation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 67 (2024) 50–61.
  • [8] L.A. Jolaoso, C. Duan, P. Kazempoor, Life cycle analysis of a hydrogen production system based on solid oxide electrolysis cells integrated with different energy and wastewater sources, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 52 (2024) 485–501.
  • [9] R.K. Iyer, J.H. Prosser, J.C. Kelly, B.D. James, A. Elgowainy, Life-cycle analysis of hydrogen production from water electrolyzers, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 81 (2024) 1467–1478.
  • [10] Y. Kim, I. Min, J. Lee, H. Yang, An Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Electrolysis for Certifying Clean Hydrogen., Energies (19961073). 17 (2024).
  • [11] J. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. He, M. Li, X. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Zhu, K. Cen, Comparison of onshore/offshore wind power hydrogen production through water electrolysis by life cycle assessment, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments. 60 (2023) 103515.
  • [12] X. Wei, S. Sharma, A. Waeber, D. Wen, S.N. Sampathkumar, M. Margni, F. Maréchal, Comparative life cycle analysis of electrolyzer technologies for hydrogen production: Manufacturing and operations, Joule. (2024).
  • [13] O. Siddiqui, I. Dincer, A well to pump life cycle environmental impact assessment of some hydrogen production routes, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 44 (2019) 5773–5786.
  • [14] C. Zhang, J.B. Greenblatt, M. Wei, J. Eichman, S. Saxena, M. Muratori, O.J. Guerra, Flexible grid-based electrolysis hydrogen production for fuel cell vehicles reduces costs and greenhouse gas emissions, Appl. Energy. 278 (2020) 115651.
  • [15] C.A. Grimes, O.K. Varghese, S. Ranjan, Light, water, hydrogen: the solar generation of hydrogen by water photoelectrolysis, Springer, 2008.
  • [16] A. Manabe, M. Kashiwase, T. Hashimoto, T. Hayashida, A. Kato, K. Hirao, I. Shimomura, I. Nagashima, Basic study of alkaline water electrolysis, Electrochim. Acta. 100 (2013) 249–256.
  • [17] P. Lerch, F. Scheller, D.G. Reichelt, K. Menzel, T. Bruckner, Electricity cost and CO2 savings potential for chlor-alkali electrolysis plants: Benefits of electricity price dependent demand response, Appl. Energy. 355 (2024) 122263.
  • [18] A. Jun, J. Kim, J. Shin, G. Kim, Achieving high efficiency and eliminating degradation in solid oxide electrochemical cells using high oxygen‐capacity perovskite, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 12512– 12515.
  • [19] J. Laurencin, J. Mougin, High‐Temperature Steam Electrolysis, Hydrog. Prod. Electrolysis. (2015) 191–272.
  • [20] A. Brisse, J. Schefold, M. Zahid, High temperature water electrolysis in solid oxide cells, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 33 (2008) 5375–5382.
  • [21] L.J. Nuttall, A.P. Fickett, W.A. Titterington, Hydrogen generation by solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis, Hydrog. Energy Part A. (1975) 441–455.
  • [22] B. Yang, Z. Zhang, S. Su, J. Li, J. Wang, R. Zhang, H. Shu, Y. Ren, L. Jiang, Y. Sang, Optimal scheduling of wind-photovoltaic-hydrogen system with alkaline and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, J. Power Sources. 614 (2024) 235010.
  • [23] S.E. Haque, Historical perspectives on climate change and its influence on nature, in: Vis. Tech. Clim. Chang. with Mach. Learn. Artif. Intell., Elsevier, 2023: pp. 15–38.
  • [24] R. Bhandari, C.A. Trudewind, P. Zapp, Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via electrolysis–a review, J. Clean. Prod. 85 (2014) 151–163.
  • [25] J. Zhang, B. Ling, Y. He, Y. Zhu, Z. Wang, Life cycle assessment of three types of hydrogen production methods using solar energy, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 47 (2022) 14158–14168.
  • [26] H.-Y. Chen, J.-C. Jeng, Integration of hydrogen production and greenhouse gas treatment by utilizing nitrogen oxide as sweep gas in a solid oxide electrolysis cell, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 130 (2022) 103937.
  • [27] K.O. Denisova, A.A. Ilyin, R.N. Rumyantsev, A.P. Ilyin, A. V Volkova, Nitrous oxide: Production, application, and protection of the environment, Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 89 (2019) 1338–1346.
  • [28] C. Bauer, K. Treyer, C. Antonini, J. Bergerson, M. Gazzani, E. Gencer, J. Gibbins, M. Mazzotti, S.T. McCoy, R. McKenna, On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production, Sustain. Energy Fuels. 6 (2022) 66–75.
  • [29] Y.A. Alhamdani, M.H. Hassim, R.T.L. Ng, M. Hurme, The estimation of fugitive gas emissions from hydrogen production by natural gas steam reforming, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 9342–9351.
  • [30] W.G. Tucker, An overview of PM2. 5 sources and control strategies, Fuel Process. Technol. 65 (2000) 379–392.
  • [31] C.I. Davidson, R.F. Phalen, P.A. Solomon, Airborne particulate matter and human health: a review, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 737–749.
  • [32] F. Fallahpour, A. Aminghafouri, A. Ghalegolab Behbahani, M. Bannayan, The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, Environ. Dev. Sustain. 14 (2012) 979–992.
  • [33] Y. Zhou, D. Swidler, S. Searle, C. Baldino, Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biomethane and hydrogen pathways in the European Union, (2021).
  • [34] A.D. La Rosa, Life cycle assessment of biopolymers, in: Biopolym. Biotech Admixtures Eco-Efficient Constr. Mater., Elsevier, 2016: pp. 57–78
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Energy
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ayşegül Yağmur Gören 0000-0003-1114-6059

Submission Date November 13, 2024
Acceptance Date February 26, 2025
Publication Date June 27, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Gören, A. Y. (2025). An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MANAS Journal of Engineering, 13(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.1584061
AMA Gören AY. An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MJEN. June 2025;13(1):40-51. doi:10.51354/mjen.1584061
Chicago Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur. “An Atmospheric Impact Assessment of Water-Based Hydrogen Production Methods: Sustainability Evaluation”. MANAS Journal of Engineering 13, no. 1 (June 2025): 40-51. https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.1584061.
EndNote Gören AY (June 1, 2025) An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MANAS Journal of Engineering 13 1 40–51.
IEEE A. Y. Gören, “An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation”, MJEN, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 40–51, 2025, doi: 10.51354/mjen.1584061.
ISNAD Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur. “An Atmospheric Impact Assessment of Water-Based Hydrogen Production Methods: Sustainability Evaluation”. MANAS Journal of Engineering 13/1 (June2025), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.1584061.
JAMA Gören AY. An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MJEN. 2025;13:40–51.
MLA Gören, Ayşegül Yağmur. “An Atmospheric Impact Assessment of Water-Based Hydrogen Production Methods: Sustainability Evaluation”. MANAS Journal of Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, 2025, pp. 40-51, doi:10.51354/mjen.1584061.
Vancouver Gören AY. An atmospheric impact assessment of water-based hydrogen production methods: Sustainability evaluation. MJEN. 2025;13(1):40-51.

Manas Journal of Engineering 

16155