The Application of Discourse Analysis to Drama: A Cross-cultural Approach

Year 2013, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 231 - 239, 30.12.2013

Ömer Şekerci

Abstract

This paper aims at briefly demonstrating how the major procedures of discourse analysis (i.e. speech acts, presuppositions, and the cooperative principle in conversation and general discourse relations) may be fruitfully applied to drama dialogue. Such a kind of purposive approach, in turn, makes it rather reasonable to distinguish between literary criticism and theatrical analysis, but not so that one is deemed to be superior to the other. “Co-operative Labour Division” is crucial because a production of a play is in effect “a play–an interpretation of it”. In terms of this context, literary criticism should also take the text as its object of investigation and develop techniques of textual analysis to cope with the implied aspects embedded within a set of linguistic or sociological conventions. All this does suggest that the most important sets of linguistic conventions for interpretation are those which govern language use. This effect means treating the text as a series of

Keywords

Speech acts, politeness, Tu, Vous, Cordelia, King Lear, cross-cultural

References

• Benveniste, E. (1971). Problems in General Linguistics. Florida: University of Miami Press.
• Brown, R., & Gilman, O. (1960). “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity”. Ed. T. A. Sebeok. Style in Language, 253-276. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Byron, L. (1994). The Works of Lord Byron. The Wordsworth Poetry Library. London: Wordsworth.
• Chomsky, A. N. (1987). “Language in a Psychological Setting”. Sophia Linguistica, 22, 1-73.
• Ervin-Tripp, S. (1974). “Sociolinguistic Rules of Address”. Eds. Pride and Helmes. Sociolinguistics, 225- 240. London: Penguin.
• Friedrich, P. (1972). “Social Context and Semantic Feature: The Russian Pronominal Usage”. Eds. J. J. Gumpers, & D. M. Hymes. Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, 270- 300. New York: Holt, Rineheart and Winston.
• Goodenough, W. H. (1957). “Cultural Anthropology and Linguistics”. Ed. P. L. Garvin. Report of the Seventh Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Study, 167-173. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press. Hall, S. (ed.). Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices. London: Sage Publications.
• Herder, J. G. von (1877-1913). Sämtliche Werke. Ed. Bernard Suphan. 33 vol. Berlin: Wiedemann.
• Humboldt, C. W. von (1903-36). Wilhelm von Humboltds Werke. Ed. Albert Leitzmann. 17 Vols. Berlin: B. Behr.
• Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.
• Mulholland, J. (1967). “‘Thou’ and ‘You’ in Shakespeare: A Study In The Second Person Pronoun”. English Studies, 48, 34-43.