The Effect of Semantic and Thematic Lists on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Retention: Self-regulatory Behaviors Compared

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 193 - 208, 30.12.2013

Masoumeh Mehregan

Öz

The present study aimed to compare the long-term and short-term effects of semantic and thematic clustering on Iranian learners’ vocabulary acquisition. The study was also an attempt to evaluate the effects of these clustering types on learners’ self-regulatory behaviors. Two groups of language learners were asked to study two word lists, one semantic (N=30) and the other thematic (N=30) clusters. After the participants finished studying the word lists that contained the definition of words and Persian equivalents, the word lists were collected and then they were given a list of the same words without the Persian equivalents. The participants were asked to provide the equivalents right after collecting the papers to consider short-term effects and also two weeks later to consider long-term effects. Results of statistical analyses showed that participants recalled the words from the thematic list as well as from the semantic list. Moreover, their self-regulatory attitudes towards the clustering types remained the same

Anahtar Kelimeler

Vocabulary acquisition, semantic clustering, thematic clustering, self-regulation

Kaynakça

• Al-Jabri, S. S. (2005). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on learning English vocabulary by Saudi Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
• Amer, A. A. (1986). “Semantic Field Theory and Vocabulary Teaching”. English Teaching Forum, 24 (1), 30-31.
• Barcroft, J. (2009). “Effects of Synonym Generation on Incidental And Intentional L2 Vocabulary Learning During Reading”. TESOL Quarterly, 43 (1), 79-103.
• Bruton, A., López, M. G., & Mesa, R. E. (2011). “Incidental L2 Vocabulary Learning: an Impracticable Term?”. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 759-768.
• Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Crow J. T., & Quigley, J. R. (1985). “A Semantic Field Approach to Passive Vocabulary Acquisition for Reading Comprehension”. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (3), 497-513.
• Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of Learning and Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• DeKeyser, R. (2003). “Implicit and Explicit Learning”. Eds. C. Doughty, & M. Long. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 313-348. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Dunbar, S. (1992). “Developing Vocabulary by Integrating Language and Context”. TESL Canada Journal, 9 (2), 73-79.
• Erten, I. H., & Tekin, M. (2008). “Effects of Vocabulary Acquisition of Presenting New Words in Semantic Sets Versus Semantically Unrelated Sets”. System, 36 (3), 407-22.