The effects of acupuncture on nausea and vomiting and consumption of propofol in cesarean section performed with spinal anesthesia
Abstract
Objective: The incidence of hypotension is 50-60% in obstetric surgeries. The most frequent comorbid clinical case of hypotention is nausea and vomiting. In addition, the probability of vomiting and nausea is very high in the period in which the peritoneum is holden after the birth of newborn. We wanted to observe the effects on nausea and vomiting occuring due to both
spinal anesthesia and traction of peritoneum during caesarean section performed under spinal anesthesia by using conventional acupuncture techniques.
Material and Method: The study including 90 patients in the I-II risk groups of American Society of Anesthesiologists who will undergone caesarean section was planned. Acupuncture was performed for group A (n=45) by using acupuncture needles from the P6 acupuncture point. Similar application was performed for group P (n=45) by using acupuncture needles from a point 3 cm proximal to P6 point. In both practice, the needle was applied 20 mm depth of the skin and upholden for 30 minutes in the
application area. Formation of nausea, vomiting and amount of propofol used was recorded for each patient.
Results: The observation rate of nausea and vomiting in the group A was significantly lower (5, 33 (p<0.05); 2, 5 (p<0.05)).
Propofol consumption rate was also significantly lower (4.6±11.7, 63.0±9.4 mg (p<0.05)).
Conclusion: The acupuncture applied perioperatively on P6 point in order to prevent nausea and vomiting in the cesarean
section performed with spinal anesthesia is an effective method and also reduces the amount of propofol which will be used to
prevent intraoperative vomiting.
Keywords
References
- Noroozinia H, Mahoori A, Hasani E, Gerami-Fahim M, Sepehrvand N.Acupuncture techniques during caesarean section. Acta Med Iran. 2013; 52: 163-7.
- Chattopadhyay S, Goswami S. Palonosetron Prophylaxis for Control of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Cesarean Delivery under Spinal Anesthesia. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2015;65: 28-33.
- Macario A, Weinger M, Camey S, Kim A. Which clinical anaesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 652-8.
- Arndt JO, Bömer W, Krauth J, Marquardt B. Incidence and time course of cardiovascular side effects during spinal anesthesia after prophylactic administration of intravenous fluids or vasoconstrictors. Anesth Analg. 1998; 87: 347–54.
- Eldaba AA, Amr YM. Intravenous granisetron attenuates hypotension during spinal anesthesia in cesarean delivery: A double-blind, prospective randomized controlled study.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 31: 329-32.
- Butterworth J. Physiology of spinal anesthesia: What are the implications for management? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998; 23: 370–3.
- Tarhan O, Canbay O, Celebi N, Uzun S, Sahin A, Coşkun F, Aypar U.Subhypnotic doses of midazolam prevent nausea and vomiting during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007; 73: 629-33.
- Norris MC. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. In: Norris MC, editor. Handbook of Obstetric Anesthesia. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000. pp. 309–12.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Mehmet Uygur
This is me
Murat Surucu
This is me
Ferdi Doganay
This is me
Erhan Hafiz
This is me
Publication Date
April 15, 2016
Submission Date
January 5, 2016
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 3 Number: 4