Assessment of long term patient satisfaction in orthognathic surgery
Abstract
Objective: Even though there are many reliable data that deal with orthognatic surgery, there is very little information about patient satisfaction. When evaluating the success of the surgery, clinicians usually take postoperative occlusion and cephalometric measurements into consideration. However for the patietns, aesthetic appearence is as important as occlusion.
Material and Methods: 80 patients who underwent orthognathic surgery between 2003-2011 in Çukurova University were studied. Patients were interviewed either personally or by the phone with a questionairre that reflect patient satisfaction such as preoperative and postoperative aesthetic facial apperance, change in self confidence, mastication, hypoestesia and pain in temporomandibular joint.
Results: 22,5 % of the patients stated that there was aesthetic improvement, 8,8 % stated only improvement in mastication and 62,5 % stated there was improvement in both. A total of 70 %(n=56) of the patients pointed out there was significant improvement in their self esteem.
Conclusion: This study suggests that outcomes of the surgeries can be evaluated not only by occlusion and cephalometric measurements but also with subjective complaints and satisfaction of the patients. To achieve long term success in orthognathic surgery, one should know the relationship between function and aesthetic facial appearence and take both of them into consideration equally.
Keywords
References
- Patel PK, Morris DE, Zhao L. Orthognathic Surgery. (Updated: 12.02.2014, Access time: 25.02.2016) Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1279747-overview
- Rosen HM. Aesthetic Orthognathic Surgery. In: Mathes SJ, Hentz VR, editors. Plastic Surgery. Vol 2. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. p. 649-86.
- Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Bacchus SN, Kaczynski R. Stability of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: rigid fixation versus transosseous wiring. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000;118(4):397-403.
- Hoppenreijs TJ, Freihofer HPM, Stoelinga PJ, Tuinzing DB, van't Hof MA. Condylar remodelling and resorption after Le Fort I and bimaxillary osteotomies in patients with anterior open bite: A clinical and radiological study aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1998;27(2):81-91.
- Tucker MY, Ochs MW. Correction of dentofacial deformities. In: Peterson LJ, Edward E, Hupp JR, Tucker MR, editors. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial surgery . 4th ed. New York: Mosby; 2003. p. 559-602.
- Schendel SA. Orthognathic surgey. In: Achauer BM, Eriksson E, Guyuron B, Coleman JJ, Russell RC, Vander Kolk CA, editors. Plastic Surgery, Vol. 2, St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. p. 871-895.
- Bailey L, Proffit W, White Jr R. Trends in surgical treatment of Class III skeletal relationships. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1994;10(2):108-18.
- Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery: a review of 655 patients. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2001;59(10):1128-36.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
April 15, 2016
Submission Date
January 26, 2016
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 3 Number: 4