Investigating demographic, socioeconomic, and obsteric risk factors of term intrauterine stillbirth cases
Abstract
|
Objective: To establish the prevalence, etiology, demographic, socioeconomic, and obstetric risks factors of intrauterine fetal deaths among term pregnancies with no risk factors. Our study is the first to investigate term stillbirth risk factors in such a large population. Material and Methods: A total of 96 cases of stillbirth between 37th and 42nd weeks with no risk factors out of 90,557 births conducted in 2011-2015 were investigated retrospectively. Eighty patients that had stillbirth in our clinic were chosen as the study cases and 80 others that had risk-free live birth at the weeks of 37-42 chosen randomly accepted as the control group. Variables such as age of mothers, gravidas, parities, level of education of mothers, time since the previous pregnancy, BMIs, weight gained during pregnancy, gestational week, birth weights of infants, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, hemoglobin values, blood glucose levels, white blood cell counts, smoking history, follow-ups at the hospital, gender of babies, and seasonal distribution of stillbirths were evaluated. Results: The stillbirth rate was found as 14 per million and stillbirth in risk-free population at 37-42 weeks was 1.05 per mill. BMI, hemoglobin levels, and systolic blood pressures of mothers were significantly higher in stillbirths. Any statistically significant difference in mean maternal age, gravida/parity, education level, weight gained during pregnancy, smoking and fetal gender distribution was not established between the groups Conclusion: Term stillbirths in the risk-free group may be correlated with advanced gestational week, increased BMI, systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin levels of the mother also insufficient antenatal follow-up. |
Keywords
References
- Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, Hogan D, Shiekh S, Qureshi ZU, You D, Lawn JE. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2016 Feb 1;4(2):e98-108.
- 2. Stanton C, Lawn JE, Rahman H, Wilczynska-Ketende K, Hill K. Stillbirth rates: delivering estimates in 190 countries. The Lancet. 2006 May 6;367(9521):1487-94.
- 3. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, Flenady V, Frøen JF, Qureshi ZU, Calderwood C, Shiekh S. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. The Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):587-603.
- 4. Sims MA, Collins KA. Fetal death: a 10-year retrospective study. The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology. 2001 Sep 1;22(3):261-5.
- 5. Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, Hankins GD. Williams obstetrics 20th edition. Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange. 1997.
- 6. Morrison I, Olsen J. Weight-specific stillbirths and associated causes of death: an analysis of 765 stillbirths. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1985 Aug 15;152(8):975-80.
- 7. Fretts RC, Boyd ME, Usher RH, Usher HA. The changing pattern of fetal death, 1961-1988. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1992 Jan;79(1):35-9.
- 8. Pitkin RM. Fetal death: diagnosis and management. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1987 Sep 1;157(3):583-9.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Özgül Oğuz Kafadar
*
This is me
0000-0001-5309-4408
Türkiye
Özlem Moraloğlu Tekin
This is me
0000-0001-8167-3837
Türkiye
Buğra Çoşkun
0000-0003-1938-3833
Türkiye
İrem Güler Özgür
This is me
0000-0002-7577-9464
Türkiye
Bora Çoşkun
Türkiye
Publication Date
July 30, 2019
Submission Date
June 26, 2019
Acceptance Date
July 17, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 7