UYGUN İŞ AÇIĞI İNSANA YARAŞMAYAN İŞLER

Year 2007, Volume: 8 Issue: 29, 2 - 10, 01.02.2007

Recep Kapar

Abstract

Uygun iþ yaklaþýmý decent work * uluslararasý sistemin ve ülkelerin ekonomik, sosyal ve siyasal gündemlerine bir dizi öncelik önermektedir. Sosyal geliþmenin saðlanmasý bakýmýndan adil bir küreselleþmenin yaratýlmasý istemi, uygun iþ yaklaþýmý ile bir araya gelmektedir. Küreselleþmenin hali hazýrdaki egemen biçimi, insanlara yaþadýklarý yerlerde istihdamlarýný saðlayacak yeterli sayýda iþ yaratamamaktadýr. Özellikle kadýnlar ve gençlerin istihdamlarýnýn saðlanmasý için, uygun iþler yaratýlmasý öncelik olarak belirmektedir. Ancak uygun iþlerin saðlanabilmesi küresel büyümenin yeniden biçimlendirilmesi ile olanaklý görünmektedir. Bir diðer öncelik ise, güvenliðin ve barýþýn saðlanmasýdýr. Uygun iþ açýðýný gidermiþ, insan onurunu koruyan bir toplum, barýþ içinde yaþayan bir toplumdur. Bu önceliðin dayandýðý ilke iþyeri, yerel, ulusal ve küresel ölçeklerin tümünde geçerli ve doðrudur 1 . Öteden beri bilindiði ve Uluslararasý Çalýþma Örgütün’ün UÇÖ Anayasasý’nda ifadesini bulduðu üzere; evrensel ve kalýcý bir barýþ ancak sosyal adalet temelinde gerçekleþebilir. Çok sayýda insan için adaletsizliðin, sefaletin ve yoksulluðun bulunduðu çalýþma koþullarýnýn varlýðý, evrensel barýþ ve ahengi tehlikeye düþürecek biçimde hoþnutsuzluða yol açar.

References

• ILO (2006a), ‘Facts on Decent Work’. [www. ilo.org/com- munication]
• Vosko, Leah F. (2002), ' 'Decent Work' The Shifting Role of the ILO and the Struggle for Global Social Justice', Global Social Policy, vol. 2(1).l
• ILO (1999), Decent Work, International Labour Confe- rence, 87th Session 1999, Report of the Director-General, Geneva.
• GHAI Dharam (2002), ‘Decent Work: Concepts, Mo- dels and Indicators’, International Institute for Labour Stu- dies, Discussion Paper, DP/139/2002, Geneva.
• CINTERFOR (2001), ‘Decent Work & Vocational Tra- ining’, CINTERFOR Papers [http://www.cinter- for.org.uy/public/english/region/ampro/cinterfor/publ/sa- la/dec_work/index.htm]
• Egger Philippe-Sengenberger Werner (2001), Decent Work Issues and Policies, ILO-Decent Work Pilot Prog- ramme, Geneva.
• UNESCO, ‘Decent Work’, [http://portal.unes co.org/ shs/ en/ev.php-URL_ ID= 4666&URL_ DO=DO_TO- PIC&URL_SECTION=201.html]
• Pursey, Stephen (2007), ‘The Decent Work Agenda: Modernizing the ILO’s Mission’, Global Social Policy, vol. 2(1).
• COM (2006)249 (2006), Promoting decent work for all, The EU contribution to the implementation of the decent work agenda in the world, Commission Staff Working Do- cument, Brussels.
• Leur, A. van (2006), Promoting decent work for all in the EU in the world; m obilising internal and external po- licies’, Promoting Decent Work in the World the contribu- tion of the EU (4-5 December 2006), Brussels.
• Sengenberger, Werner (2001), ‘Decent Work: The In- ternational Labour Organization’ Agenda, Dialogue + Co- operation 2/2001.
• ILO (2001), Reducing the Decent Work Deficit: A Global Challenge, International Labour Conference, 89th Session 2001, Report of the Director-General, Geneva.
• Trebilcock, Anne (2005), ‘Decent Work and the Infor- mal Economy’, UNU-WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2005/04.
• Schölvinck, Johan (2006), ‘Promoting decent work for all in the EU and in the world: Mobilizing internal and ex- ternal policies’, Promoting Decent Work in the World the contribution of the EU (4-5 December 2006), Brussels.
• ILO (2005), A Global Alliance Against Forced Labour, Global Report under the Follow-up to the ILO Declarati- on on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Inter- national Labour Conference, 93rd Session 2005, Report of the Director-General, Geneva.
• ILO (2006b), The end of child labour: Within reach, Global Report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, Internati- onal Labour Conference, 95th Session 2006, Report of the Director-General, Geneva.
• ILO (2004a), ‘More women are entering the global la- bour force than ever before, but job equality, poverty re- duction remain elusive’, 2004 Press releases, Friday 5 March 2004 (ILO/04/09).
• UN (2005), The Inequality Predicament Report on the World Social Situation 2005, Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations, A/60/117/Rev.1, ST/E- SA/299, New York.
• ILO (2004b), ‘Half the World’s Workers Living below US$ 2 a Day Poverty Line’, Press Release Monday, 6 De- cember 2004.
• Bardone, Laura - Guio, Anne-Catherine (2005), In- Work Poverty, New commonly agreed indicators at the E- U level, EUROSTAT Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions, 5/2005.
• Anker, Richard vd., (2003), ‘Measuring decent work with statistical indicators’, International Labour Review; C.142, No.2.
• Özen, Serap (2007), ‘Çalýþanýn Ýþ ve Aile Sorumluluk- larýnýn Dengelemesinde Sendikalar’, Sendikal Notlar, S.32 (Þubat) (Baskýda).
• ILO (2007a), Equality at work: Tackling the challen- ges, Global Report under the follow-up to the ILO Decla- ration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, In- ternational Labour Conference, 96th Session 2007, Report of the Director-General, Geneva.
• ILO (2007b), Safe and healthy workplaces Making de- cent work a reality, The ILO Report for World Day for Sa- fety and Health at Work, International Labour Organizati- on, Geneva.
• Kapar, Recep (2004), ‘Çevresel Konularda Sendikal Gerekçeler ve Açýlýmlar: Sosyal Dayanýþmanýn Gücü’, Sendikal Notlar, S.2 (Kasým-2004).
• Reynaud, Emmanuel (2006), ‘Social Security for all: Global Trends and Challenges’, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2.
• Standing, Guy (2001), ‘Global Insecurity: Restructu- ring Social Income’, Global Tensions Conference in Honor of Ester Boserup (9-10 March, 2001), Cornell University. [http:// www. bisnath.com/events/Global_Tensions/pa- pers/standing.html]
• ILO (2004c), Organizing for Social Justice, Global Re- port under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fun- damental Principles and Rights at Work, International La- bour Conference, 92th Session 2004