COVID-19 Merceğinden Habis Sorunlar ve Kamu Yönetimi

Year 2020, Issue: 22, 238 - 251, 01.11.2020

Özlem Menekşe Rumelili Koç

Abstract

Toplumların yaşamlarında tanımlanmaları ve çözümlenmeleri oldukça karmaşık sorunlar bulunmaktadır. Doğru ya da yanlış olarak nitelendirilebilecek bir çözümü olmayan bu sorunlar, habis olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Kamu yönetimlerine, bu sorunların çözümünde önemli rol düşmektedir. Neoliberal politikalar ekseninde kamu yönetimleri, 1980 sonrasında yeni kamu işletmeciliği ilkeleriyle yeniden yapılanmıştır. Bu yapılanma, devletin kısa dönemli performans, somut çıktı ve kârlılık gibi hedeflerle özel sektör kurallarına göre işletilmesini esas almaktadır. Çalışmada, yeni kamu işletmeciliği ile yapılandırılmış olan kamu yönetimleri, habis sorunların çözümlerine nasıl bir alt yapı hazırlamaktadır sorusunun yanıtı aranmaktadır. Bu sorunun yanıtının aranmasında, 2020 yılında tüm dünyayı etkileyen habis bir sorun olan COVID-19 bir mercek olarak kullanılmıştır.

Keywords

Habis sorun, yeni kamu işletmeciliği, kamu yönetimi, COVID-19

References

• Alford, J. ve Head, B. W. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: A typology and a contingency framework. Policy and Society, 36 (3), 397–413.
• Altuğ, B. (2020a). Dünya Sağlık Örgütünün Kovid-19 kronolojisi: Çelişkiler, soru işaretleri, kaos ve ABD faktörü. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/analiz/dunya-saglik-orgutunun-kovid-19-kronolojisiceliskiler-soru-isaretleri-kaos-ve-abd-faktoru/1809458 (19.07.2020)
• Altuğ, B. (2020b). https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/koronavirus/dunya-saglik-orgutu-yeni-tipkoronavirusu-kuresel-salgin-ilan-etti/1762600 (25.06.2020)
• Baekkeskov, E. (2016). Same threat, different responses: Experts steering politicians and stakeholders in 2009 H1N1 vaccation policy-making. Public Administration, 94 (2), 299-315.
• Baekkeskov, E. ve Rubin, O. (2014). Why pandemic response is unique: Powerful experts and hands-off political leaders. Disaster Prevention and Management, 23 (1), 81–93.
• Bicker, L. (2020). Coronavirus: How South Korea 'crushed' the curve. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-asia-52584494/coronavirus-how-south-korea-crushed-the-curve (23.06.2020).
• Boin, A. ve Lodge, M. (2016). Designing resilient institutions for transboundary crisis management: A time for public administration. Public Administration, 94 (2), 289-298.
• Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2014). State fragility and failure as wicked problems: Beyond naming and taming. Third World Quarterly, 35 (2), 333-344.
• Cohen, S., Eimicke, W. ve Horan, J. (2002). Catastrophe and the public service: A case study of the government response to the destruction of the World Trade Center. Public Administration Review, 62 (4), 24-32.
• Comfort, L. K. (2002). Rethinking security: Organizational fragility in extreme events. Public Administration Review, 62 (4), 98-107.
• Çetin, Ş. (2020). Avrupa Hastalık Kontrol Merkezi: Maske sadece ilave koruma aracı olabilir. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/koronavirus/avrupa-hastalik-kontrol-merkezi-maske-sadece-ilavekoruma-araci-olabilir/1828244 (26.06.2020).
• Donahue, A. K. ve O'Keefe, S. (2007). Universal lessons from unique events: Perspectives from Columbia and Katrina. Public Administration Review, 67 (1), 77-81.
• EC (2010). Assessment report on EU-wide pandemic vaccine strategies. https://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/communicable_diseases/docs/assessment_vaccine_en.pdf (22.06.2020)
• Farazmand, A. (2007). Learning from the Katrina crisis: A global and international perspective with implications for future crisis management. Public Administration Review, 67 (1), 149-159.
• Gao, X. ve Jianxing, J. (2020). Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19: information, decision-making and execution. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5(2), 178-197.
• Guida, M. (2020). İtalya’da koronavirüs travması. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/analiz/italya-dakoronavirus-travmasi/1767496 (25.06.2020).
• Gutiérrez, P. ve Kirk, A. (2020). https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2020/jun/25/revealed-data-shows-10-countries-risking-coronavirus-second-wave-as-lockdownrelaxed (06 26, 2020).
• Güler, B. (2020). İdarenin Covid-19 pandemisine ilişkin sokağa çıkma yasağı kararlarının kanuni idare ilkesi kapsamında değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 38 (2), 180-201.
• Hart, P., Uriel, R., Alexander, K. (2020). Crisis decision making: The Centralization Thesis revisited. Administration & Society, 25(1), 12-44.
• Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked Problems in Public Policy. Public Policy, 3 (2), 101 – 118.
• Head, B. W. (2018). Forty years of wicked problems literature: forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38 (2), 180-197.
• ILO (2020). COVID-19: Job creation through employment-intensive public works programmes, https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/documents/publication/wcms_743537.pdf (05.05.2020).
• Kapucu, N. (2005). Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: Networks in emergency response management. Connections, 26, 33–48.
• Kettl, D. F. (2020). States Divided: The Implications of American Federalism for COVID-19. Public Administration Review, 80( 4), 595-602.
• Koç, Ü. (2019). Green growth and Turkey. Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology and Science Volume 2, 770-778.
• Koç, Ü. (2020). Sektörel enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 55 (1), 508-521.
• McConnell, A. (2016). Reappraising wicked problems: Wicked policy vs. simple politics. 66th Annual International Conference 21-23 March 2016 (s. 1-16). Brighton: Political Studies Association (PSA).
• Mervis, J. ve Malakoff, D. (2020). https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/trump-s-2021-budget-drowns-science-agencies-red-ink-again (23.06.2020)
• Miller, S. (2020). https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/04/angela-merkelgermany-coronavirus-pandemic/610225/ (30.06.2020).
• Gürbilek, N. (1992). Vitrinde yaşamak 1980’lerin kültürel iklimi. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• Newman, J. ve Head, B. W. (2017). Wicked tendencies in policy problems: Rethinking the distinction between social and technical problems. Policy and Society, 36 (3), 414-429.
• OECD (2020). Public management and the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic: Emerging responses and initial recommendations, https://www.oecd.org/governance/budgeting/PEMResponses-to-Coronavirus (Covid-19).pdf (21.07.2020).
• Oord, V., ve ark. (2020). Network of networks: Preliminary lessons from the Antwerp Port Authority on crisis management and network governance to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Administration Review, 80 (5), 880-894.
• Oppenheimer, M., ve ark. (2019). Discerning experts: The practices of scientific assessment for environmental policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Plumer, B. ve Davenport, C. (2019). Science under attack: How Trump is sidelining researchers and their work. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/28/climate/trump-administration-war-onscience.html(23.06.2020)
• Qi, Y., Du, C. D., Liu, T., & Dong, X. Z. (2020). Experts’ conservative judgment and containment of COVID-19 in early outbreak. Journal of Chinise Governance, 5 (2), 1-1.
• Rumelili Koç, M. Ö. (2019). Merkez Bankacılığı hizmetinin özerkliği bağlamında Merkez Bankaları. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 14 (31), 1-28.
• Roberts, A. (2020). The third and fatal shock: How pandemic killed the Millennial Paradigm. Public Admnistration Review, 80 (4), 603-609.
• Samancı, U. (2016). Uluslararası Sağlık Tüzüğü (2005) ve hukuki niteliği. D.E.Ü. Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (2), 113-169.
• Uzun, A. (2020). Bir araştırma nesnesi olarak habis sorunlar ve kamu yönetimi disiplini. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 15 (2), 663-676.
• Weible, C. M., ve ark. (2020). COVID 19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives. Policy Sciences, 53, 225-241.
• Zhang, F., Welch, E. W., Qing, M. (2018). Public organization adaptation to extreme events: Mediating role of risk perception. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3).