Müzik Aletlerinin Bir Etnomüzikolojisi: Form, İşlev ve Anlam

Year 2021, Issue: 24, 767 - 776, 01.11.2021

Henry M. Johnson Translator: Seyit Yöre

Abstract

Müzik Aletlerinin Bir Etnomüzikolojisi: Form, İşlev ve Anlam

Keywords

Müzik Aletlerinin Bir Etnomüzikolojisi, Form, İşlev ve Anlam

References

• Abraham, O. ve von Hornbostel, E. M. (1975 [1903]). Studies on the tonsystem and music of the Japanese (G. Kurath ve W. Maim, çev.). Klaus P. Wachsmann, Dieter Christensen ve Hans-Peter Reinecke (ed.), Hornbostel opera mmnia içinde (ss. 1-84). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, Vol. I.
• Arnold-Forster, K. ve La Rue, H. (1993). Museums of music: A review of musical collections in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.
• Baily, J. (1977). Movement patterns in playing the Herati dutār. J. Blacking (ed.), The anthropology of the body içinde (ss. 275-330). London: Academic Press.
• Blacking, J. (1973). How musical is man? Seattle: University of Washington Press.
• Blacking, J. (1987). ‘A commonsense view of all music’: Reflections on Percy Grainger’s contribution to ethnomusicology and music education). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brincard, M. T. (ed.). (1989). Sounding forms: African musical instruments. New York: American Federation of Arts.
• De Vale, S. C. (1977). A Sundanese23 gamelan: A Gestalt approach to organology (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Northwestern University, Illinois.
• De Vale, S. C. (1988). Musical instruments and ritual: A systematic approachd. Journal of the American Musical Instrument Society, 14, ss. 126-60.
• De Vale, S. C. (1990). Organizing organology. Selected Reports in Ethnomusicology, 8, ss. 1-34.
• De Vale, S. C. (1991). Musical instruments and the micro-/macrocosmic juncture. T. Yoshihiko vd. (ed.), Tradition and its future in music: Report of SIMS24 Osaka içinde (ss. 255-62). Tokyo: Mita Press.
• De Vale, S. C. ve Dibia, I. W. (1991). Sekar Anyar: An exploration of meaning in Balinese25gamelan. World of Music, 33(1), ss. 5-51.
• Dournon, G. ve Arom, S. (1981). Guide for the collection of traditional musical instruments. Paris: The UNESCO Press.
• Dournon, G. (1992). Organology. Helen Myers (ed.), Ethnomusicology: An introduction içinde (ss. 245-300). London: The Macmillan Press.
• Dräger, H.-H. (1948). Prinzip einer systematik der musikinstrumente. Basel: Barenreiter-Verlag (Musikwissenschaftliche Arbeiten, Gesellschaft für Musikforschung, Nr. 3).
• Feld, S. (1982). Sound and sentiment: Birds, weeping, poetics and song in Kaluli26 expression). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Grame, T. C. (1962). Bamboo and music: A new approach to organology. Ethnomusicology, 6(1), ss. 8-14.
• Grame, T. C. (1972). The symbolism of the “ud”. Asian Music, 3(1), ss. 25-34.
• Grame, T. C. ve Tsuge, G. (1972). Steed symbolism on Eurasian string instruments. Musical Quarterly, 58(1), ss. 57-66.
• Hood, M. (1971). The ethnomusicologist. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Hornbostel, E. M. von, ve Sachs, C. (1961 [1914]). Classification of musical instruments (A. Baines ve K. P. Wachsmann, çev.). Galpin Society Journal, 34, ss. 3-29.
• Johnson, H. M. (1993). The Symbolism of the koto: An ethnomusicology of the form and function of a traditional Japanese musical instrument (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). University of Oxford, Oxford.
• Kárpáti, J. (1989). Myth[s] as organological fact[s]: After rereading Dénes Bartha’s “Double Pipe of Jánoshida”. Studia Musicologica, 31, ss. 5-38.
• Kartomi, M. J. (1990). On concepts and classifications of musical instruments. London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Lindsay, J. (1979). Javanese gamelan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Merriam, A. P. (1964). The anthropology of music. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
• Roseman, M. (1991). Healing sounds from the Malaysian rainforest: Temiar27 music and medicine. Berkeley etc.: The University of California Press.
• Sachs, C. (1940). The history of musical instruments. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.
• Schafer, R. M. (1973). The music of the environment. Cultures, 1(1), ss. 15-52.
• Schafer, R. M. (1992). Music, non-music and the soundscape. J. Paynter vd. (ed.), Companion to contemporary musical thought içinde (Cilt 1, ss. 34-45). London: Routledge.
• Simonson, L. (1987). A Burmese arched harp (saùng-gauk) and its pervasive Buddhist symbolism. Journal of the American Musical Instrument Society, 13, ss. 39-64.
• Sorrell, N. (1990). A guide to the gamelan. London: Faber and Faber.
• Stockmann, D. (1991). Interdisciplinary approaches to the study of musical communication structures. B. Nettl ve P. V. Bohlman (ed.), Comparative musicology and anthropology of music: Essays on the history of ethnomusicology içinde (ss. 318-41). London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Tatsui, T. N. S. (ed.). (1990). Suikinkutsu no hanashi [A discussion of suikinkutsu]. Tokyo: Kenchiku Shiryô Kenkyû-sha.
• Tokumaru, Y. (1986). The interaction of orality and literacy in structuring Syamisen28 music. T. Yosihiko ve Y. Osamu (ed.), The oral and the literate in music içinde (ss. 110-29). Tokyo: Academia Music,
• Tsuge, G. (1978). Bamboo, silk, dragon and phoenix: Symbolism in the musical instruments of Asia. The World of Music, 20(3), ss. 10-19.
• Tsuge, G. (1983). Raiment of traditional Japanese musicians: Its social and musical significance. The World of Music, 25(1), ss. 55-67.
• Tsuge, G. (1986). Explicit and implicit aspects of koto kumiuta29 notations. T. Yosihiko ve Y. Osamu (ed.), The oral and the literate in music içinde (ss. 252-72). Tōkyō: Academia Music.
• Van Gulik, R. H. (1940). The lore of the Chinese lute: An essay in Ch’in ideology. Tokyo: Sophia University.
• Wachsmann, K. (1984). Classification. S. Sadie (ed.), The New Grove dictionary of musical instruments içinde (Cilt I, ss. 407-10). London: Macmillan Press.
• Waterhouse, D. (1986). The logical priority of performance for the analysis of music. T. Yosihiko ve Y. Osamu (ed.), The oral and the literate in music içinde (ss. 371-79). Tōkyō: Academia Music,
• Winternitz, E. (1967). Musical instruments and their symbolism in Western art. London: Faber and Faber.
• Yamaguti, O. (1986). Music and its transformations in direct and indirect contexts. T. Yosihiko ve Y. Osamu (ed.), The oral and the literate in music içinde (ss. 29-37). Tōkyō: Academia Music.
• Yamaguti, O. (1991). Performance as a historical source in music research. T. Yosihiko vd. (ed.), Tradition and its future in music: Report of SIMS Osaka (the Fourth Symposium of the International Musicological Society) içinde (ss. 153-57). Tōkyō: Mita Press.