Abstract
Despite of the fact that there aren’t a lot of studies in quantum physic and quantum physics’ instruction in Turkey, it has been observed that studies in this field were carried out with physic department or pre-service physic teachers. The purpose of this study is revealing the ratio of ideas pre-service science teachers have about quantum physic before and after instruction and determining the conceptual understanding rate. This research was conducted with a total of 48 students studying in science teaching. Data in the scope of research were obtained from the concept test and semi-structured interviews. Before the instruction, it has been understood that pre-service science teachers have alternative concepts about quantum physics. After the instruction, it can be said that most of the pre-service science teachers have scientific concepts about quantum physic and conceptual understanding concerning of quantum physic
References
- Akarsu, B. (2007). Students’ Misconceptual Understanding of Quantum Physics in College Level Classroom Environments. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana Universty, Faculty of the Graduate School.
- Akarsu, B., Çoşkun, H. ve Kariper, A. İ. (2011). An Investigation on College Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Quantum Physics Topics. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8 (15), 349–362.
- Ayene, M., Kriek, J. and Damtie, B. (2011).Wave-particle Duality and Uncertainty Principle: Phenomenographic Categories of Description of Tertiary Physics Students’ Depictions. Physıcal Revıew Specıal Topıcs - Physıcs Educatıon Research 7, 020113.
- Bethge, T. and Niedderer, H. (1996). Students’ Conceptions in Quantum Physics. (13 Mart 2009) http://www.idn.uni-bremen.de/pubs/Niedderer/1995-AJP-TBHN.pdf
- Çalışkan, S., Selçuk, G. and Erol, M. (2009). Student Understanding of Some Quantum Physical Concepts, Lat. American Journal of Physics Education. 3(2), 2–15.
- Didiş, N., Eryılmaz, A., ve Erkoç, Ş., (2007). Students’ Comprehension of Fundamental Concepts in Quantum Mechanics: A Qualitative Study. GIREP-EPEC Conference- Frontiers of Physics Education, Croatia.
- Didiş, N., Özcan, Ö. ve Abak, M. (2008). Öğrencilerin Bakış Açısıyla Kuantum Fiziği: Nitel Çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 86–94.
- Görecek, M. (2013). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Kuantum Fiziği Temel Kavramlarını Anlama Düzeylerine 7E Öğretim Modelinin Etkisi. Doktora Tezi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Balıkesir.
- Müller, R. and Wiesner, H. (2002). Teaching Quantum Mechanics on An Instroductory Level. American Journal of Physics. 70(3), 200–209.
- Niedderer H., and Petri J. (1998). A Learning Pathway in High-School Level Quantum Atomic Physics. Internaitonal Journal of Sciende Education. 9, 1075-1088.
- Özcan, Ö. (2009). Kuantum Mekaniği ve Görelilik Öğreniminde Karşılaşılan Kavramsal ve Matematiksel Zorlukların Araştırılması. Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Ortaöğretim Fen ve Matematik Alanlar Eğitimi, Ankara.
- Özdemir, E. ve Erol, M. (2011). Kuantum Fiziğinde Belirsizlik İlkesi. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 20-35.
- Pendrill A.M. M. (2012). Drama as Part of Quantum Physics Teaching. 44th Conference of the European Group on Atomic Systems. (9–13 July). University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Rebello, N.S. and Zollman, D. (1999). Conceptual Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
- After Using Hands-On and Visualization Instruction Materials. Papers presented at The Annual Meeting National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (12 Mayıs 2008),
- http: //www.phys.ksu.edu/perg/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf.
- Robblee, K.M., Garik., P. and Abegg, G., (1999). Using Computer Visualization Software to Teach Quantum Science: The Impact on Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Papers presented at the annual meeting National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (13 Mart 2009), http://www.idn.uni-bremen.de/pubs/Niedderer/1999-NARSTWKSQAP
- Saçkes, M. (2010). The Role of Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Motivational Variables in Conceptual Change: Preservice Early Childhood Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of the Cause of Lunar Phases. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate Program in Education, The Ohio State University, The Ohio State.
- Singh, C. (2001). Student’s Understanding of Quantum Mechanics. American Journal of Physics. 69, 885–895.
- Steinberg R., Wittmann M. C., Bao L. and Redish E. F. (1999) The influence of student understanding of classical physics when learning quantum mechanics, in D. Zollman (Eds) (1999), 41-44. Papers presented at the annual meeting National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (13 Mart 2009).
- Şen, A. İ. (2000). Kuantum Fiziği Alan Öğretimi Konusunda Almanya’da Yapılan Tartışmaların Son Durumu. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 122–127.
- Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K. and Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of Moon Phases Before and After Instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 633–655.
- Troncoso, C. E. and Chrobak, R. (2000). Modern Physics in Engineering Carrers. (21 Nisan 2009), http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2000/Proceedings/papers/WD1-3.pdf
- Uçar, S. (2007). Using Inquiry-Based Instruction with Web-Based Data Archives to Facilitate Conceptual Change About Tides Among Preservice Teachers, Ph. D. Thesis, Ohio State University.
- Wichmann, E. H.(1971) Kuantum Fiziği Berkeley Fizik Dersleri Cilt 4 (Çev: Durlu T. N., ve Elerman Y.) Bilim yayınevi (2005)
- Wuttiprom, S. (2008). Development and use of a conceptual survey in introductory quantum physics, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Mahidol University, Bangkok.
- Yıldız, A. (2009). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kuantum Fiziği Konularını Anlama Düzeyleri ve Öğrenme Amaçlı Yazma Aktivitelerinin Akademik Başarıya Etkisi, Doktora tezi, Atatürk üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Meryem GÖRECEK BAYBARS
- Fen Bilgisi Öğretmeni.
- Gümüşhane-Torul Namık Kemal Ortaokulu
- E-mail: mgorecek@hotmail.com Doç. Dr.
- Balıkesir Üniversitesi,Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi
- E-mail: hkucuk@balikesir.edu.tr
Abstract
Özet
Ülkemizde kuantum fiziği ve kuantum fiziği öğretimi ile ilgili çalışma sayısı çok fazla olmamakla birlikte, yapılan çalışmaların daha çok fizik bölümü veya fizik öğretmenliği öğrencileri ile gerçekleştirildiği gözlenmektedir. Bu çalışma ile Fen Bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının öğretim öncesi ve öğretim sonrasında kuantum fiziği ile ilgili fikirlerinin ne olduğu ve yapılan öğretimin kavramsal anlamaya etkisi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini Fen Bilgisi öğretmenliğinde öğrenim gören toplam 48 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak kavram testi ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler kullanılmıştır. Öğretim öncesinde Fen Bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının kuantum fiziği ile ilgili alternatif kavramlara sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğretim sonrasında ise, Fen Bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının çoğunun kuantum fiziği ile ilgili bilimsel kavramlara sahip olduğu ve kuantum fiziği ile ilgili kavramsal anlamanın gerçekleşmiş olduğu belirlenmiştir.
Anahtar kelimeler: Kuantum fiziği, alternatif kavram, kavramsal anlama
THE PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF QUANTUM PHYSICS
Abstract
Despite of the fact that there aren’t a lot of studies in quantum physic and quantum physics’ instruction in Turkey, it has been observed that studies in this field were carried out with physic department or pre-service physic teachers. The purpose of this study is revealing the ratio of ideas pre-service science teachers have about quantum physic before and after instruction and determining the conceptual understanding rate. This research was conducted with a total of 48 students studying in science teaching. Data in the scope of research were obtained from the concept test and semi-structured interviews. Before the instruction, it has been understood that pre-service science teachers have alternative concepts about quantum physics. After the instruction, it can be said that most of the pre-service science teachers have scientific concepts about quantum physic and conceptual understanding concerning of quantum physic.
Key Words: Quantum physic, alternative concept, conceptual understanding
References
- Akarsu, B. (2007). Students’ Misconceptual Understanding of Quantum Physics in College Level Classroom Environments. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana Universty, Faculty of the Graduate School.
- Akarsu, B., Çoşkun, H. ve Kariper, A. İ. (2011). An Investigation on College Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Quantum Physics Topics. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8 (15), 349–362.
- Ayene, M., Kriek, J. and Damtie, B. (2011).Wave-particle Duality and Uncertainty Principle: Phenomenographic Categories of Description of Tertiary Physics Students’ Depictions. Physıcal Revıew Specıal Topıcs - Physıcs Educatıon Research 7, 020113.
- Bethge, T. and Niedderer, H. (1996). Students’ Conceptions in Quantum Physics. (13 Mart 2009) http://www.idn.uni-bremen.de/pubs/Niedderer/1995-AJP-TBHN.pdf
- Çalışkan, S., Selçuk, G. and Erol, M. (2009). Student Understanding of Some Quantum Physical Concepts, Lat. American Journal of Physics Education. 3(2), 2–15.
- Didiş, N., Eryılmaz, A., ve Erkoç, Ş., (2007). Students’ Comprehension of Fundamental Concepts in Quantum Mechanics: A Qualitative Study. GIREP-EPEC Conference- Frontiers of Physics Education, Croatia.
- Didiş, N., Özcan, Ö. ve Abak, M. (2008). Öğrencilerin Bakış Açısıyla Kuantum Fiziği: Nitel Çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 86–94.
- Görecek, M. (2013). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Kuantum Fiziği Temel Kavramlarını Anlama Düzeylerine 7E Öğretim Modelinin Etkisi. Doktora Tezi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Balıkesir.
- Müller, R. and Wiesner, H. (2002). Teaching Quantum Mechanics on An Instroductory Level. American Journal of Physics. 70(3), 200–209.
- Niedderer H., and Petri J. (1998). A Learning Pathway in High-School Level Quantum Atomic Physics. Internaitonal Journal of Sciende Education. 9, 1075-1088.
- Özcan, Ö. (2009). Kuantum Mekaniği ve Görelilik Öğreniminde Karşılaşılan Kavramsal ve Matematiksel Zorlukların Araştırılması. Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Ortaöğretim Fen ve Matematik Alanlar Eğitimi, Ankara.
- Özdemir, E. ve Erol, M. (2011). Kuantum Fiziğinde Belirsizlik İlkesi. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 20-35.
- Pendrill A.M. M. (2012). Drama as Part of Quantum Physics Teaching. 44th Conference of the European Group on Atomic Systems. (9–13 July). University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Rebello, N.S. and Zollman, D. (1999). Conceptual Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
- After Using Hands-On and Visualization Instruction Materials. Papers presented at The Annual Meeting National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (12 Mayıs 2008),
- http: //www.phys.ksu.edu/perg/papers/narst/QM_papers.pdf.
- Robblee, K.M., Garik., P. and Abegg, G., (1999). Using Computer Visualization Software to Teach Quantum Science: The Impact on Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Papers presented at the annual meeting National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (13 Mart 2009), http://www.idn.uni-bremen.de/pubs/Niedderer/1999-NARSTWKSQAP
- Saçkes, M. (2010). The Role of Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Motivational Variables in Conceptual Change: Preservice Early Childhood Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of the Cause of Lunar Phases. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate Program in Education, The Ohio State University, The Ohio State.
- Singh, C. (2001). Student’s Understanding of Quantum Mechanics. American Journal of Physics. 69, 885–895.
- Steinberg R., Wittmann M. C., Bao L. and Redish E. F. (1999) The influence of student understanding of classical physics when learning quantum mechanics, in D. Zollman (Eds) (1999), 41-44. Papers presented at the annual meeting National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (13 Mart 2009).
- Şen, A. İ. (2000). Kuantum Fiziği Alan Öğretimi Konusunda Almanya’da Yapılan Tartışmaların Son Durumu. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 122–127.
- Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K. and Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of Moon Phases Before and After Instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 633–655.
- Troncoso, C. E. and Chrobak, R. (2000). Modern Physics in Engineering Carrers. (21 Nisan 2009), http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2000/Proceedings/papers/WD1-3.pdf
- Uçar, S. (2007). Using Inquiry-Based Instruction with Web-Based Data Archives to Facilitate Conceptual Change About Tides Among Preservice Teachers, Ph. D. Thesis, Ohio State University.
- Wichmann, E. H.(1971) Kuantum Fiziği Berkeley Fizik Dersleri Cilt 4 (Çev: Durlu T. N., ve Elerman Y.) Bilim yayınevi (2005)
- Wuttiprom, S. (2008). Development and use of a conceptual survey in introductory quantum physics, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Mahidol University, Bangkok.
- Yıldız, A. (2009). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kuantum Fiziği Konularını Anlama Düzeyleri ve Öğrenme Amaçlı Yazma Aktivitelerinin Akademik Başarıya Etkisi, Doktora tezi, Atatürk üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Meryem GÖRECEK BAYBARS
- Fen Bilgisi Öğretmeni.
- Gümüşhane-Torul Namık Kemal Ortaokulu
- E-mail: mgorecek@hotmail.com Doç. Dr.
- Balıkesir Üniversitesi,Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi
- E-mail: hkucuk@balikesir.edu.tr
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | May 28, 2014 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2014 |