Research Article

COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES

Volume: 6 Number: 1 June 30, 2020
EN

COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES

Abstract

The estimation of the cooling load through the building envelope is an essential task in the selection of proper HVAC system components that influences the building’s performance. For this task, ASHRAE has presented several methods to calculate the building cooling load due to heat gain, such as the total equivalent temperature difference method (TETD), the cooling load temperature difference method (CLTD), and the radiant time series method (RTS). The present study aims to explore the accuracies of those calculation methods in terms of energy efficiency. In this regard, an analytical solution method utilizing Complex Finite Fourier Transform Technique (CFFT) was developed for the calculation of cooling load due to heat gain to compare the temperature differences obtained from the TETD and CLTD methods. Then, a computer program was prepared in MATLAB to perform the calculations based on an analytical methodology. Besides, the estimated CLTD and TETD values by the CFFT were compared with those values presented in the Handbook of the ASHRAE. The calculation results revealed there is a good agreement between the analytical and presented results in the ASHRAE Manual for the selected building envelopes. However, several differences were found between the estimated TETD and CLTD cooling load values and those presented in the Handbook of ASHRAE.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Yumrutaş, R., Kaşka, Ö., Yıldırım, E., “Estimation of total equivalent temperature difference values for multilayer walls and flat roofs by using periodic solution”, Building and Environment, 42, 1878–1885, 2007.
  2. [2] Bansal, K., Chowdhury, S., Gopal, M.R., “Development of CLTD values for buildings located in Kolkata, India”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 28, 1127–1137, 2008.
  3. [3] Yumrutas, R., Unsal, M., Kanoglu, M., “Periodic solution of transient heat flow through multilayer walls and flat roofs by complex finite Fourier transform technique”, Building and Environment, 40, 1117–1125, 2005.
  4. [4] Wang, S.K., Handbook of air conditioning and refrigeration, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.
  5. [5] ASHRAE, ASHRAE handbook-fundamentals, ASHRAE, Atlanta, 1993.
  6. [6] Chaiyapinunt, S., Mangkornsaksit, K., and Phueakphongsuriya, B., “Development of cooling load temperature differential values for building envelopes in Thailand.”, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 27, 677-688, 2004.
  7. [7] Mackey, C.O., Wright, L.T., “Periodic heat flow-homogeneous walls or roofs”, ASHVE Transactions, 50, 293-312, 1944.
  8. [8] Mackey CO, Wright LT. “Periodic heat flow-composite walls or roofs”, ASHVE Transaction,s 52, 283, 1946.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2020

Submission Date

October 9, 2019

Acceptance Date

January 13, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 6 Number: 1

APA
Oktay, H., Yumrutaş, R., & Işık, M. Z. (2020). COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, 6(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.631222
AMA
1.Oktay H, Yumrutaş R, Işık MZ. COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology. 2020;6(1):18-26. doi:10.22531/muglajsci.631222
Chicago
Oktay, Hasan, Recep Yumrutaş, and M. Zerrakki Işık. 2020. “COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 6 (1): 18-26. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.631222.
EndNote
Oktay H, Yumrutaş R, Işık MZ (June 1, 2020) COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 6 1 18–26.
IEEE
[1]H. Oktay, R. Yumrutaş, and M. Z. Işık, “COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES”, Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 18–26, June 2020, doi: 10.22531/muglajsci.631222.
ISNAD
Oktay, Hasan - Yumrutaş, Recep - Işık, M. Zerrakki. “COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 6/1 (June 1, 2020): 18-26. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.631222.
JAMA
1.Oktay H, Yumrutaş R, Işık MZ. COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology. 2020;6:18–26.
MLA
Oktay, Hasan, et al. “COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, June 2020, pp. 18-26, doi:10.22531/muglajsci.631222.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Oktay, Recep Yumrutaş, M. Zerrakki Işık. COMPARISON OF CLTD AND TETD COOLING LOAD CALCULATION METHODS FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ENVELOPES. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology. 2020 Jun. 1;6(1):18-26. doi:10.22531/muglajsci.631222

Cited By

8805

Mugla Journal of Science and Technology (MJST) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Pseudonymity License 4.0 international license