Research Article

COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Volume: 6 Number: 1 June 30, 2020
EN

COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Abstract

The main purpose of Heating, Ventilating and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) systems is to satisfy thermal comfort for the occupants. Conventionally, HVAC systems adjust set-temperature to achieve thermal comfort by continuously measuring indoor air temperature of the environment. However, ASHRAE 55, a standard of acceptable thermal environments, offers to use acceptable ranges of operative temperatures in air-conditioned buildings. Considering operative temperature is a function of indoor air temperature and mean radiant temperature, set-temperature of HVAC system can be controlled by using operative temperature to satisfy neutral thermal comfort for the occupants. This study compares thermal comfort and energy consumption of two exactly same HVAC systems which are operated based on indoor air temperature and operative temperature, respectively. Two office rooms with same architectural configurations -which are located in a university-Ankara-Turkey- were selected as a case study. The HVAC systems were operated based on indoor air temperature and operative temperature, respectively, at the same time and occupancy schedules. The results showed that operative temperature driven controlled HVAC system achieves better thermal comfort while slightly increasing energy consumption. The main findings of this study would be useful not only to design energy-efficient HVAC systems but also create more comfortable environments.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] ASHRAE 55, Thermal Environment Conditions for Human Occupancy, 2017.
  2. [2] ISO 7730, Moderate Thermal Environments- Determination of the PMV and PPD indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort, International Standards Organization, 1995.
  3. [3] Fanger, P., Thermal Comfort, Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen, 1970.
  4. [4] Calvino, M., Gennusa, M.L., Morale, M., Rizzo, G. and Scaccianoce, G., “Comparing Different Control Strategies for Indoor Thermal Comfort Aimed at the Evaluation of the Energy Cost Quality of the Building”, Journal of Process Control, 24 (6), 703-713, 2014.
  5. [5] Oktay, H., Argunhan, Z., Yumrutaş, Y., Işık, M.Z. and Budak, N., “An Investigation of the Influence of Thermophysical Properties of Multilayer Walls and Roofs on the Dynamic Thermal Characteristics”, Muğla Journal of Science and Technology, 2 (1), 48-54, 2016.
  6. [6] Wu, Z., Li, N., Wargocki, P., Peng, J., Li, J. and Cui, H., “Adaptive Thermal Comfort in Naturally Ventilated Dormitory Buildings in Changsha, China”, Energy and Buildings, 186, 56-70, 2019.
  7. [7] Becchio, C., Corgnati, S.F., Vio, M., Crespi, G., Prendin, L., Ranieri, M. and Vidotto, D., “Toward NZEB by optimizing HVAC system configuration in different climates”, Energy Procedia, 140, 115-126, 2017.
  8. [8] Kwok, A.G. and Chun, C., “Thermal Comfort in Japanese Schools”, Solar Energy, 74 (3), 245-252, 2003.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2020

Submission Date

January 23, 2020

Acceptance Date

June 17, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 6 Number: 1

APA
Turhan, C. (2020). COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, 6(1), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.679256
AMA
1.Turhan C. COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology. 2020;6(1):156-163. doi:10.22531/muglajsci.679256
Chicago
Turhan, Cihan. 2020. “COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 6 (1): 156-63. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.679256.
EndNote
Turhan C (June 1, 2020) COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 6 1 156–163.
IEEE
[1]C. Turhan, “COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION”, Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 156–163, June 2020, doi: 10.22531/muglajsci.679256.
ISNAD
Turhan, Cihan. “COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 6/1 (June 1, 2020): 156-163. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.679256.
JAMA
1.Turhan C. COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology. 2020;6:156–163.
MLA
Turhan, Cihan. “COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, June 2020, pp. 156-63, doi:10.22531/muglajsci.679256.
Vancouver
1.Cihan Turhan. COMPARISON OF INDOOR AIR TEMPERATURE AND OPERATIVE TEMPERATURE -DRIVEN HVAC SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology. 2020 Jun. 1;6(1):156-63. doi:10.22531/muglajsci.679256

Cited By

8805

Mugla Journal of Science and Technology (MJST) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Pseudonymity License 4.0 international license