Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

ÇAM BALINDA FARKLI DNA İZOLASYON TEKNİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2016, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 152 - 155, 18.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.283638

Abstract



Bal, arılar ve diğer bazı böcek türleri tarafından
oluşturulan tatlı bir besindir. Çam balı ise, arıların Marchalina hellenica gibi çam ağaçları üzerinde yaşayan böceklerin salgılarını kullanarak
oluşturdukları bir bal çeşididir. Çam balı üretiminin Akdeniz ülkelerinde
özellikle Türkiye ve Yunanistan’ın bazı bölgelerinde olduğu bilinmektedir. En
çok tüketilen doğal besinlerin başında gelen bal insan sağlığı açısından birçok
faydaya sahiptir. Bu nedenle, balın fizikokimyasal ve biyolojik özellikleri ile
birlikte meydana geldiği botanik kökenin belirlenmesi oldukça önemlidir.
Baldaki polen çeşitliliği, mikroorganizma varlığı ve GDO gibi statülerin
bilinmesi hem ekonomik hem de sağlık açısından önem taşımaktadır. Bu bilgileri
elde etmek için en etkili yollardan biri çam balında bulunan DNA’nın analizi
ile biyolojik türlerin tespitidir. Fakat doğası gereği oldukça viskoz olan ve içinde
bulundurduğu inhibitörlerden dolayı balın DNA analizi kolay değildir. Şu ana
kadar yapılan çalışmalar incelendiğinde baldan DNA analizi için güvenilir ve verimli
sonuç veren bir DNA izolasyon tekniği olmadığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışmamızda Muğla’dan
toplanan çam balı örneklerinin presipite edilmiş polenlerinden, üç farklı
teknik kullanılarak, DNA izolasyonları yapılmıştır. Bu teknikler arasında; CTAB
yöntemi, manuel silika dioksit yöntemi ve DNeasy Plant Mini Kit yöntemi
bulunmaktadır. Teknikler DNA saflığı ve kalitesi bakımından karşılaştırılmıştır.
Çalışma sonucunda, mevcut koşullar altında Muğla çam balından DNA izolasyonu
için en verimli tekniğin DNeasy plant kit olduğu gösterilmiştir.




References

  • Al-jabri AA, “Honey, milk and antibiotics”, African Journey of Biotechnology, 4: 1580-1587. 2005.
  • Barth, M. O. “Melissopalynology in Brazil: a review of pollen analysis of honeys, propolis and pollen loads of bees”, Scientia Agricola, v. 61, n. 3, p. 342-350, 2004.
  • Casiraghi, M., Bruni, I., De Mattia, F., Galimberti, A., Galasso, G., Banfi, E., & Labra, M., “Identification of poisonous plants by DNA barcoding approach”, International Journal of Legal Medicine, 124(6), 595–603. 2010.
  • Etzold E, Lichtenberg-Kraag B, “Determination of the botanical origin of honey by Fourier-Transformed İnfrared Spectroscopy: An approach for routine analysis”, Eur Food Res Technol; 227 (2): 579-586. 2007.
  • Fay, M. F., Bayer, C., Alverson, W. S., de Bruijin, A. Y., & Chase, M. W. “Plastid rbcL sequence data indicate a close affinity between Diegodendron and Bixa”, Taxon, 47, 43–50, 1998.
  • Fleischmann, A.; Heubl, G. “Overcoming DNA extraction problems from carnivorous plants”, Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid, v. 66, n. 2, p. 209-215, http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ ajbm.2198, 2009.
  • Galimberti, A., Bruni, I., De Mattia, F., Galasso, G., Banfi, E., Casiraghi, M., & Labra, M. 2014, “A DNA barcoding approach for identify plant spicies in multiflower honey”, Food Chemistry 170: 308–315, 2015.
  • Jain, S.A. et. al. “Extraction of DNA from honey and its amplification by PCR for botanical identification”, Food Sci. Technol, Campinas, 33(4): 753-756, 2013.
  • Koca, I.; Koca, A ‘F. “Poisoning by mad honey”, Food and Chemical Toxicology, v. 45, p. 1315-1318, 2007.
  • Liberato, M. C. T. C. Moaris, M. S. Magalhaes, C. E. C. Magalhales, I. H. Cavalcati, D. B. Silva, M. M. O. “Physicochemical properties and mineral and protein content of honey samples from Ceará state”, Northeastern Brazil, Food Science and Technology, v. 33, n. 1, p. 38-46, 2013.
  • Marguitas L, Stanciu O, Dezmirean D, Bobis O, Popescu O, Bogdanov S. and Campos M. “In Vitro antioxidante capacity of honeybee-collected pollen of selected floral origin harvested from Romania”. Food Chemistry 115: 878-883, 2009.
  • Moyo, M. Baiuru, M. W. Amoo, S. O. Van Staden, J. “Optimising DNA isolation for medicinal plants”, South African Journal of Botany, v. 74, n. 4, p. 771-775.
  • Namias N 2003, “Honey in the management of infections. Surg. Infect”, 4: 219-226, 2008.
  • Ramirez R, Montenegro YG “Certificación del origen botánico y polen corbicular perteneciente a la comuna de Litueche”, VI Región de Chile’, Cien. Inv. Agric., 31: 197-211, 2004.
  • Sharma, P.; Purohit, S. D “An improved method of DNA isolation from polysaccharide rich leaves of Boswellia serrata Roxb”, Indian Journal of Biotechnology, v. 11, p. 67-71. 2012.
  • Stanimirova, I. Üstün, B. Caijka, C. Riddelova, K Hajslova, J. Buydens, L. M. C. Walczak, B. ‘Tracing the geographical origin of honeys based on volatile compounds profiles assessment using pattern recognition techniques”, Food Chemistry, v. 118, n. 1, p. 171- 176, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.079, 2010.
  • Subrahmanyam M “Topical application of honey for burn wound treatment-an overview”, Ann. Burns Fire Disasters. 20: 3. 2007.
  • Wang, J.; Li, Q. “Chemical Composition, Characterization, and Differentiation of Honey Botanical and Geographical Origins’, Advances in Food and Nutrition Research”, v. 62, p. 89-137, 2011.

EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY

Year 2016, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 152 - 155, 18.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.283638

Abstract

Honey is a sweet food made by bees and some other insects. Pine honey is a type of honey which is produced by honey bees from the sugary secretions made by the some insect species, such as Marchalina hellenica, living on the pine trees. Pine honey is mostly produced in the Mediterranean countries such as Turkey and some regions of Greece. Honey is a highly consumed natural food product and it is associated with numerous health benefits. The knowledge of physiochemical and biological properties of honey as well as its floral origin is very important. Knowing the diversity of pollens, microorganism content of honey or ensuring its GMO (genetically modified organisms) status is significant both in terms of health and economy. To obtain such information, one of the most effective ways is to analyze the DNA of pine honey and identify the biological species it contains.  Due to the nature of pine honey such as its viscosity and the presence of inhibitors, there is not a perfect reliable convincing DNA isolation method available to date.  In this study, we collected pine honey samples from Mugla region (Turkey) and isolated DNA from the precipitated pollens of the honey using three different DNA isolation approaches. These methods include a modified CTAB method, manual silica dioxide approach and DNeasy Plant Mini Kit. DNA extraction protocols were compared in terms of DNA yield and purity. We demonstrate that the use of DNeasy plant kit has given relatively better results under the conditions of the current study for the Pine honey of Muğla.

References

  • Al-jabri AA, “Honey, milk and antibiotics”, African Journey of Biotechnology, 4: 1580-1587. 2005.
  • Barth, M. O. “Melissopalynology in Brazil: a review of pollen analysis of honeys, propolis and pollen loads of bees”, Scientia Agricola, v. 61, n. 3, p. 342-350, 2004.
  • Casiraghi, M., Bruni, I., De Mattia, F., Galimberti, A., Galasso, G., Banfi, E., & Labra, M., “Identification of poisonous plants by DNA barcoding approach”, International Journal of Legal Medicine, 124(6), 595–603. 2010.
  • Etzold E, Lichtenberg-Kraag B, “Determination of the botanical origin of honey by Fourier-Transformed İnfrared Spectroscopy: An approach for routine analysis”, Eur Food Res Technol; 227 (2): 579-586. 2007.
  • Fay, M. F., Bayer, C., Alverson, W. S., de Bruijin, A. Y., & Chase, M. W. “Plastid rbcL sequence data indicate a close affinity between Diegodendron and Bixa”, Taxon, 47, 43–50, 1998.
  • Fleischmann, A.; Heubl, G. “Overcoming DNA extraction problems from carnivorous plants”, Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid, v. 66, n. 2, p. 209-215, http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ ajbm.2198, 2009.
  • Galimberti, A., Bruni, I., De Mattia, F., Galasso, G., Banfi, E., Casiraghi, M., & Labra, M. 2014, “A DNA barcoding approach for identify plant spicies in multiflower honey”, Food Chemistry 170: 308–315, 2015.
  • Jain, S.A. et. al. “Extraction of DNA from honey and its amplification by PCR for botanical identification”, Food Sci. Technol, Campinas, 33(4): 753-756, 2013.
  • Koca, I.; Koca, A ‘F. “Poisoning by mad honey”, Food and Chemical Toxicology, v. 45, p. 1315-1318, 2007.
  • Liberato, M. C. T. C. Moaris, M. S. Magalhaes, C. E. C. Magalhales, I. H. Cavalcati, D. B. Silva, M. M. O. “Physicochemical properties and mineral and protein content of honey samples from Ceará state”, Northeastern Brazil, Food Science and Technology, v. 33, n. 1, p. 38-46, 2013.
  • Marguitas L, Stanciu O, Dezmirean D, Bobis O, Popescu O, Bogdanov S. and Campos M. “In Vitro antioxidante capacity of honeybee-collected pollen of selected floral origin harvested from Romania”. Food Chemistry 115: 878-883, 2009.
  • Moyo, M. Baiuru, M. W. Amoo, S. O. Van Staden, J. “Optimising DNA isolation for medicinal plants”, South African Journal of Botany, v. 74, n. 4, p. 771-775.
  • Namias N 2003, “Honey in the management of infections. Surg. Infect”, 4: 219-226, 2008.
  • Ramirez R, Montenegro YG “Certificación del origen botánico y polen corbicular perteneciente a la comuna de Litueche”, VI Región de Chile’, Cien. Inv. Agric., 31: 197-211, 2004.
  • Sharma, P.; Purohit, S. D “An improved method of DNA isolation from polysaccharide rich leaves of Boswellia serrata Roxb”, Indian Journal of Biotechnology, v. 11, p. 67-71. 2012.
  • Stanimirova, I. Üstün, B. Caijka, C. Riddelova, K Hajslova, J. Buydens, L. M. C. Walczak, B. ‘Tracing the geographical origin of honeys based on volatile compounds profiles assessment using pattern recognition techniques”, Food Chemistry, v. 118, n. 1, p. 171- 176, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.079, 2010.
  • Subrahmanyam M “Topical application of honey for burn wound treatment-an overview”, Ann. Burns Fire Disasters. 20: 3. 2007.
  • Wang, J.; Li, Q. “Chemical Composition, Characterization, and Differentiation of Honey Botanical and Geographical Origins’, Advances in Food and Nutrition Research”, v. 62, p. 89-137, 2011.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Journals
Authors

Bekir Çöl

Mehmet Karaali This is me

Publication Date December 18, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Çöl, B., & Karaali, M. (2016). EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, 2(2), 152-155. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.283638
AMA Çöl B, Karaali M. EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY. MJST. December 2016;2(2):152-155. doi:10.22531/muglajsci.283638
Chicago Çöl, Bekir, and Mehmet Karaali. “EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 2, no. 2 (December 2016): 152-55. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.283638.
EndNote Çöl B, Karaali M (December 1, 2016) EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 2 2 152–155.
IEEE B. Çöl and M. Karaali, “EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY”, MJST, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 152–155, 2016, doi: 10.22531/muglajsci.283638.
ISNAD Çöl, Bekir - Karaali, Mehmet. “EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology 2/2 (December 2016), 152-155. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.283638.
JAMA Çöl B, Karaali M. EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY. MJST. 2016;2:152–155.
MLA Çöl, Bekir and Mehmet Karaali. “EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY”. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, 2016, pp. 152-5, doi:10.22531/muglajsci.283638.
Vancouver Çöl B, Karaali M. EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DNA ISOLATION METHODS FROM PINE HONEY. MJST. 2016;2(2):152-5.

Cited By

5975f2e33b6ce.png
Mugla Journal of Science and Technology (MJST) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Pseudonymity License 4.0 international license