GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞENİN ÖTESİNDE: TÜRKİYE VE FARKLI KÜRESEL OYUNCULARDA POLİTİKA FAİZİ VE ENFLASYON İLİŞKİ KOPUŞUNU ANLAMAK

Year 2024, , 152 - 194, 27.06.2024

Caner Özdurak , Sadi Uzunoğlu

https://doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.1394213

Abstract

Çalışma, Türkiye'de politika faizleri ile borç verme faizleri arasındaki farklılaşmanın enflasyon üzerindeki etkisini, özellikle uyarlanabilir beklentilerin rolüne odaklanarak incelemektedir. Analiz, Ocak 2003'ten Ocak 2023'e kadar olan uzun bir dönemi kapsıyor ve altı ülkeyi içeriyor: Almanya, Fransa, İtalya, İspanya, ABD, İngiltere ve Türkiye. Çalışma, Türkiye'de politika faizleri ile borç verme faizleri arasında kalıcı ve anlamlı bir farklılığın olduğunu ortaya koyuyor. Ayrıca, para birimindeki değer kaybı, hem bankaların borçlanma maliyetini hem de işletmeler ve tüketiciler için fonlama maliyetini arttırması nedeniyle Türkiye'deki borç verme faizleri üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Ayrıca çalışma, politika faizleri, borç verme faizleri ve enflasyon arasındaki ilişkide uyum beklentilerinin önemli bir rol oynadığını ortaya koyuyor. Geçmiş enflasyon oranlarının mevcut enflasyon beklentileri üzerinde önemli bir etkisi vardır ve bu da enflasyon oranını etkilemektedir. Bu olgu, borçluların yüksek enflasyon ve belirsiz politika ortamında artan riski telafi etmek için daha yüksek borç verme oranları talep etmesiyle daha da kötüleşiyor ve politika faizleri ile borç verme faizleri arasındaki fark daha da açılıyor. Çalışmanın bulguları, Türkiye gibi yumuşak para birimi ekonomilerindeki para politikası, borç verme oranları, enflasyon ve döviz kurunun karmaşık dinamikleri hakkında değerli bilgiler sağlıyor. Sonuçlar, uyum beklentileri ve döviz kurunun enflasyon dinamikleri üzerindeki etkisini dikkate alırken politika faiz oranları ile borç verme faiz oranları arasındaki farklılaşma sorununun ele alınmasının önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Keywords

Yapısal VAR, döviz kurları, enflasyon, faiz oranı geçişkenliği

BEYOND DEVELOPED AND EMERGING: UNPACKING POLICYLENDING RATE DISCONNECTIONS AND INFLATION IN TURKIYE WITH A DIVERSE GLOBAL CAST

Abstract

The study examines the impact of the divergence between policy rates and lending rates on inflation in Turkey, with a specific focus on the role of adaptive expectations. The analysis covers a long period, from January 2003 to January 2023, and includes six countries: Germany, France, Italy, Spain, US, UK and Turkey. The study finds that there is a persistent and significant divergence between policy rates and lending rates in Turkey. Additionally, the depreciation of the currency has a significant impact on lending rates in Turkey, as it increases both the cost of borrowing for banks and the cost of funding for businesses and consumers. Moreover, the study suggests that adaptive expectations play an important role in the relationship between policy rates, lending rates, and inflation. Past inflation rates have a significant impact on current inflation expectations, which, in turn, influences the inflation rate. This phenomenon is exacerbated by borrowers demanding higher lending rates to compensate for the increased risk in an environment of high inflation and uncertain policy, further widening the gap between policy rates and lending rates. The study's findings provide valuable insights into the complex dynamics of monetary policy, lending rates, inflation, and the exchange rate in soft currency economies such as Turkey. The results highlight the importance of addressing the issue of the divergence between policy rates and lending rates, while taking into account the impact of adaptive expectations and the exchange rate on inflation dynamics.

Keywords

Structural VAR, exchange rates, inflation, interest rate pass-through

References

• Akcelik, Y., Aysan, A. F.,and Oduncu, A. (2013a). Central banking making during the post-crisis world and the policy mix of the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye. Journal of Central Banking: Theory and Practice, 2(1), pp. 5–18
• Albertazzi, U., Ropele, T., Sene, G., and Signoretti, M., F. (2014). The impact of the sovereign debt crisis on the activity of Italian banks. Journal of Banking & Finance. Vol (46), pp. 387-402.
• Alper, K., Kara, H., Yorukoglu, M. (2012). Rezerv Opsiyonu Mekanizmasi [The reserve option mechanism]. CBT Research Notes in Economics, 2012-28.
• Alper, K., Kara, H., Yorukoglu, M. (2013). Alternative tools to manage capital flow volatility. CBRT Working Paper, 13/31.
• Avcı, S., B., and Yucel, E. (2023). Effectiveness of monetary policy: evidence from Türkiye. Eurasian Economic Review. Volume 7, pp. 179–213.
• Aysan, A. F., Fendoglu, S., and Kilinc, M. (2015). Managing short-term capital flows in new central banking: Unconventional monetary policy framework in Türkiye. Eurasian Economic Review, 4(1), pp. 45–69.
• Aysan, A. F., Fendoglu, S., Kilinc, M. (2013). Macroprudential policies as buffer against volatile cross-border capital flows. Singapore Economic Review (forthcoming).
• Barro, R. J., and D. B. Gordon. (1983). A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in Natural Rate Model. Journal of Political Economy. 91 (4): pp. 589–610.
• Basci, E., and Kara, H. (2011). Financial stability and the monetary policy. CBRT Working Paper, 11/08.
• Beirne, J (2012). The EONIA spread before and during the crisis of 2007–2009: the role of liquidity and credit risk. Journal of International Money and Finance. 31: pp 534–51
• Binici, M., Erol, H., Ozlu, P., Unalmis, D. (2013b). Faiz Koridoru bir Makro İhtiyati Arac Olabilir mi? [Interest rate corridor: a new macroprudential policy tool]. CBT Research Notes in Economics, 2013-20.
• Degerli, A., and Fendoglu, S. (2013a). Doviz kuru beklentileri ve TCMB para politikasi [Exchange rate expectations and CBRT monetary policy]. CBT Research Notes in Economics, 2013-02.Return to ref 2013a in article
• Degerli, A., and Fendoglu, S. (2013b). Reserve option mechanism as a stabilizing policy tool: Evidence from exchange rate expectations. CBRT Working Paper, 13/28.
• Dornbusch, R. (2001). Fewer Monies, Better Monies. The American Economic Review. 91 (2): pp. 238–242.
• Fama, E. (1975). Short-term interest rates as predictors of inflation. The American Economic Review 65 (3), pp. 269–282.
• Fama, E., Schwert, G. (1977). Asset returns and inflation. Journal of Financial Economics 5 (2), pp. 115–146.
• Fisher, I., (1930). The Theory of Interest. New York Macmillan.
• Gilchrist,S., Zakrajšek, E. (2012). Credit Supply Shocks and Economic Activity in a Financial Accelerator Model. https://www.russellsage.org/sites/all/files/Rethinking-Finance/Gilchrist.pdf
• Giavazzi, F., and A. Giovannini. (1989). Limiting Exchange Rate Flexibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Grabowski, W., & Stawasz-Grabowska, E. (2021). How have the European central banks’ monetary policies been affecting financial markets in CEE-3 countries? Eurasian Economic Review. 11(1), pp. 43–83.
• Han, Y., and Kim, H., M (2023). Monetary shocks on the Korean stock index: structural VAR analysis. Eurasian Economic Review. Volume 13, pp. 85–102
• Holton, S., and Rodriguez d’Acri, C., (2015). Jagged cliffs and stumbling blocks: interest rate pass-through fragmentation during the euro area crisis. Central Bank of Ireland working paper 01RT15.
• Hristov, N., Hülsewig, O., and Wollmershauser, T. (2014). The interest rate pass-through in the Euro area during the global financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance. Vol (48), pp. 104-119.
• Illes, A., and M Lombardi (2013). Monetary policy and lending rates before and after the great financial crisis. BIS Working Papers.
• Kilinc, M., Kilinc, Z., and Turhan, I. (2012). Resilience of Turkish economy during the global financial crisis of 2008. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 48(S5), pp. 19–34.
• Kim, D.-H., S.-C. Lin, J. Hsieh, and Y. B. Suen. (2018). The Fisher Equation: A Nonlinear Panel Data Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 54 (1), pp. 162–180.
• Kucuksarac, D., & Ozel, O. (2012). Reserve options mechanism and computation of reserve options coefficients. CBT Research Notes in Economics, 2012-33/07.
• Mishkin, F. (1992). Is the fisher effect for real? : A re-examination of the relationship between inflation and interest rates. Journal of Monetary Economics 30 (2), pp. 195–215.
• Oduncu, A., Akcelik, Y., Ermisoglu, E. (2013). Reserve options mechanism and FX volatility. CBRT Working Paper, 2013-03.
• Oduncu, A., Taskin, T., Ermisoglu, E., & Akcelik, Y. (2014). Effects of additional monetary tightening on exchange rates. Eurasian Economic Review, 4(1), 75–83.
• Ornek, I. (2009). Turkiye’de parasal aktarim mekanizmasi kanallarinin isleyisi. Processing of monetary transmission mechanism channels in Türkiye. Maliye Dergisi, 156, pp. 104–125.
• Peker, O., & Canbazoglu, B. (2011). Turkiye’de banka kredi kanalinin isleyisi: Ampirik bir Analiz Processing of bank lending channel in Türkiye: An empirical analysis. Yonetim ve Ekonomi 18 (2). Celal Bayar Universitesi I.I.B.F. Manisa.
• Sargent, T. J. (1973). Interest Rates and Prices in the Long Run: A Study of the Gibson Paradox. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 5 (1): pp. 385–449
• Şen, H., Kaya, A., Kaptan, Ş., and Cömert,, M. (2020). Interest rates, inflation, and exchange rates in fragile EMEs: A fresh look at the long-run interrelationships, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Vol (29:3), pp. 289-318, Doi: 10.1080/09638.199.2019.1663441
• Summers, L. (1983). The non-adjustment of nominal interest rates: A study of the fisher effect. In: Tobin, J. (Ed.), Prices and quantities: A macroeconomic analysis. Brookings Inst. Pr., pp. 201–246.
• Tsong, C. C., and A. Hachicha. (2014). Revisiting the Fisher Hypothesis for Several Selected Developing Economies: A Quantile Cointegration Approach. Economic Issues 19 (1): pp. 57–72.
• Von Borstel, J., Eickmeier, S., and Krippner, L. (2016). The interest rate pass-through in the euro area during the sovereign debt crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance Vol (68), pp. 386–402.
• Wicksell, K. (1907). The Influence of the Rate of Interest on Prices. The Economic Journal 17 (66): pp. 213–220.
• Wicksell, K. 1936 [1898]. Interest and Prices: A Study of the Causes Regulating the Value of Money. London: Macmillan and Co