SOSYAL KİMLİK KURAMI AÇISINDAN TÜKETİCİ – MARKA ÖZDEŞLEŞMESİ VE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2020, , 63 - 90, 07.07.2020

Tansu Işıkay Ahmet Başcı

https://doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.763919

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Tüketici – marka özdeşleşmesi çalışmalarının 2000’li yıllar içerisinde pazarlama literatüründe yoğunluk kazandığı görülmektedir. Tüketici – marka özdeşleşmesi, tüketicilerin kimliklerini ifade etmek için markaların sembolik anlamlarını kendilerine nasıl atfettiklerinin anlaşılması açısından büyük öneme sahiptir. Bu sembolik anlamlar benlik – marka arasındaki bağlantıları içerdiğinden tüketici – marka ilişkilerin anlaşılmasında oldukça önemlidir. Temelde sosyal kimlik teorisine dayanan tüketici – marka özdeşleşmesi, markaların tüketicilerin kendilerini sınıflandırılması için olanak sağladığı ve bu marka sınıflandırmalarının, marka kullanıcıları arasında olası farklılıklara yol açtığını varsaymaktadır. Çalışmanın temel amacı sosyal kimlik teorisi açısından tüketici – marka özdeşleşmesini incelemek, tüketici – marka özdeşleşmesi ve literatür araştırması sonucunda belirlenen öncüller arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz etmektir. Araştırma modelinde tüketici – marka özdeşleşmesi belirli unsurlar açısından incelenmiştir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda prestij, marka ayırt ediciliği, markanın sosyal faydası ve hatırlanabilir marka deneyimleri olarak belirlenen öncüllerin marka çekiciliği ve tüketici-marka özdeşleşmesi üzerindeki etkileri ortaya konmuştur. Ayrıca marka çekiciliği değişkeninin tüketici – marka özdeşleşmesi üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir.

Keywords

Sosyal kimlik kuramı, tüketici – marka özdeşleşmesi, tüketici-marka özdeşleşmemesi, marka çekiciliği, marka prestiji, marka ayırt ediciliği, markanın sosyal faydası, hatırlanabilir marka deneyimleri

References

• AAKER, D. (2003). The Power of the Branded Differentiator. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 83 – 87.
• AGRES, S. J., & Dubitsky, T. M. (1996). Changing needs for Brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(1), 21-30.
• ASHFORTH , B., & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization . Academy of Management Review, 20-39.
• BAEK, T. H., Kim, J., & Yu, H. J. (2010). The Differential Roles of Brand Credibility and Brand Prestige in Consumer Brand Choice. Psychology & Marketing, 27(7), 662 – 678.
• BAGOZZI, R. (1995). Reflections on Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 23(4), 273-277.
• BAGOZZI, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 45-61.
• BAGOZZI, R. P., Bergami, M., Marzocchi, G. L., & Morandin, G. (2012). Customer–Organization Relationships:Development and Test of a Theory of Extended Identities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 63-76.
• BALL, D., & Tasaki, L. H. (1992). The Role and Measurement of Attachment in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(2), 155-172.
• BELK , R. W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.
• BERGAMI, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555-577.
• BHATTACHARYA , C., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 76-88.
• BHATTACHARYA , C., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76-88.
• BHATTACHARYA, C., Rao, H., & Glynn, M. (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59, 46-57.
• BREWER, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology, 17(5), 475-482.
• CARLSON, B. D., Donavan, D. T., & Kevin , J. C. (2009). Consumer-brand relationships in sport: brand personality and identification. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(4), 370 – 384.
• De CHERNATONY, L., Mcdonald, M., & Wallace, E. (2011). Creating Powerful Brands (4 b.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• DICK, R. v. (2001). Identification in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(4), 265-283.
• ELBEDWEIHY, A. M., Jayawardhena, C., Elsharnouby, M. H., & Elsharnouby, T. H. (2016). Customer relationship building: The role of brand attractiveness and consumer–brand identification. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2901-2910.
• ELBEDWEIHY, A., & Jayawardhena, C. (2012). Consumer-Brand Identification: Conceptualization, Antecedents and Consequences. Academy of Marketing Annual Conference, 1-7.
• ELLEMERS, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self Categorization, Commitment to the Group, and Group Self-Esteem as Related but Distinct Aspects of Social Identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.
• ESCALAS, J. E. (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1/2), 168-180.
• ESCALAS, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339-348.
• ESCALAS, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378-389.
• GONZALEZ-Benito, O., Martınez-Ruiz, M. P., & Molla-Descals, A. (2008). Latent segmentation using storelevel scanner data. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 1(17), 37 – 47.
• HALL, D., Schneider , B., & Nygren, H. (1970). Personal Factors in Organizational Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 176-190.
• HAYES, J. B., Alford, B. L., Silver, L., & York, R. P. (2006). Looks matter in developing consumer-brand relationships. 15(5), 306-315.
• HE, H., Harris, L. C., Wang, W., & Haiderd, K. (2016). Brand identity and online self-customisation usefulness perception. Journal of Marketing Manegement , 32(13-14), 1308-1332.
• HE, H., Li, Y., & Harris, L. (2012). Social identity perspective on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 65, 648-657.
• HE, Y., Chen, Q., Lee, R. P., Wang, Y., & Pohlmann, A. (2017). Consumers’ Role Performance and Brand Identification: Evidence from a Survey and a Longitudinal Field Experiment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38, 1-11.
• HOGG, M. A., Terry , D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255-269.
• JOSIASSEN, A. (2011). Consumer Disidentification and Its Effects on Domestic Product Purchases: An Empirical Investigation in the Netherlands. Journal of Marketing, 75, 124-140.
• KIM, C. K., Han, D., & Park, S.-B. (2001). The effect of brand personality and brand identification on brand loyalty: Applying the theory of social identification. Japanese Psychological Research, 43(4), 195-206.
• KREINER, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-27.
• KUENZEL, S., & Halliday, S. V. (2008). Investigating antecedents and consequences of brand identification. Journal of Product & Brand Management,, 293-304.
• KUENZEL, S., & Halliday, S. V. (2010). The chain of effects from reputation and brand personality congruence to brand loyalty: The role of brand identifi cation. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 18, 167-176.
• LAKANIE, P. A., & Mojarrad, N. (2015). The Antecedents and Concequences of Brand Prestıge in Smartphone Industry in Iran. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(4), 16-41.
• LAM, S. K. (2012). Identity-motivated marketing relationships: research synthesis, controversies, and research agenda. Academy of Marketing Science, 2, 72-87.
• LAM, S. K., Ahearne, M., Mullins, R., Hayati, B., & Schillewaert, N. (2013). Exploring the dynamics of antecedents to consumer–brand identification with a new brand. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 234-252.
• LAM, S., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74, 128-146.
• LUHTANEN, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One’s Social Identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302-318.
• MAEL, F. (1988). Organizational identification: Construct redefinition and a field application with organizational alumni. Wayne State University,Michigan: Detroit.
• MAEL, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
• MARIN, L., & de Maya, S. R. (2013). The role of affiliation, attractiveness and personal connection in consumercompany identification. European Journal of Marketing, 47(3/4), 655 – 673.
• McCRACKEN, G. (1989). Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310-321.
• McQUISTON, D. H. (2004). Successful branding of a commodity product: The case of RAEX LASER steel. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 345 – 354.
• MICHEAL, Hogg, M., Turner, J. C., & Schulze, C. N. (1986). Social Categorization, Intergroup Behavior: Two Experiments. Revista de Psicologia Social, 24.
• MOJARRAD, N., & Lakanie, P. A. (2015). Determining and Prioritizing the Key Indicators to Choose a Hotel From the Iranıan Perspective. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(3), 49-75.
• MUNIZ, A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412 – 432.
• O’CASS, A., & Frost, H. (2002). Status brands: Examining the effects of non-productrelated. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(2), 67-88.
• PARK, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1-17.
• ROMANIUK, J., Sharp, B., & Ehrenberg, A. (2007). Evidence concerning the importance of perceived brand differentiation. Australasian Marketing Journal, 15(2), 42-54.
• SARUHAN, Ş. C., & Özdemirci, A. (2011). Bilim, Felsefe veMetodoloji (2 b.). İstanbul: Beta.
• SIRGY, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287-300.
• SO, K. K., King, C., Hudson, S., & Meng, F. (2017). The missing link in building customer brand identification: The role of brand attractiveness. Tourism Management, 59, 640-651.
• SOPHONSIRI, S., & Polyorat, K. (2009). The impact of brand personality dimensions on brand association and brand attractiveness: the case study of KFC in Thailand. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 5(2), 51-62.
• STOKBURGER-SAUER, N., Ratneshwar, S., & Sen, S. (2012). Drivers of consumer–brand identification. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 406-418.
• STRYKER, S., & Serpe, R. (1982). Commitment, Identity Salience, and Role Behavior: Theory and Research Example. W. Ickes, & E. Knowles içinde, Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior (s. 199-218). New York: Springer.
• Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive Aspects of Prejudice. Journal of Biosocial Science Suppl, 173-91.
• TAJFEL, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
• TAJFEL, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. W. Austin, & S. Worchel içinde, The social psychology of intergroup relations (s. 33-47). Monterey,CA: Brooks/Cole.
• TAJFEL, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel içinde, Psychology of Intergroup Relations (s. 6-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
• THOMPSON, C. J., Rindfleisch, A., & Arsel, Z. (2006). Emotional branding and the strategic value of the Doppelg€anger brand image. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 50 – 64 .
• TIAN, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2014). Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50-66.
• TURNER, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity:some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 5-34.
• TURNER, J. C., & Onorata, R. S. (1999). Social identity, personality and the self-concept: A self – categorization perspective. T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John içinde, The psychology of the social self (s. 11-46). Lawrence Erlbaum.
• TURNER, J. C., Tajfel, H., & Brown, R. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204.
• VIGNERON, F., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). A review and a conceptual framework of. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1(1), 1-15.
• WEIGOLD, M. F., Flusser, S., & Ferguson, M. A. (1992). Direct Response Advertising: The Contributions of Price, Information, Artwork, and Individual Differences to Purchase Consideration. Journal of Direct Marketing, 6(2), 32-39.
• WOLTER, J. S., Brach, S., Cronin Jr, J. J., & Bonnd, M. (2016). Symbolic drivers of consumer–brand identification and disidentification. Journal of Business Research, 69, 785-793.