THE EFFECT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC VARIABLES ON PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON PUBLIC EXPENDITURE IN TURKEY

Year 2020, , 202 - 222, 31.12.2020

Nagihan Birinci Osman Murat Telatar

https://doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.854314

Abstract

Public sector performance is regarded as the impact of government activities on certain key economic
and social indicators, that is, the outcome of public sector activities. In this respect, the share of public
expenditures, which is considered as one of the most important indicators of the size of the public sector,
in the gross domestic product is also considered as a powerful tool in terms of revealing the public sector
performance. There are many studies in the literature examining the effect of public expenditures on socioeconomic
variables. In this study, different from other studies in the literature, the effects of socio-economic
variables on public expenditures were investigated. Thus, it is aimed to determine the effects of socioeconomic
variables on public performance through public expenditures. For this purpose, the effects of the
net public debt stock, the human development index, and the unemployment rate on public expenditure
were analyzed by cointegration tests for the 1990-2018 period in Turkey. Empirical results obtained reveal
that there is a long run relationship between variables. Accordingly, increases in net public debt stock and
human development index increase public expenditures, while increases in the unemployment rate create
a decrease in public expenditures.

Keywords

Public Sector Performance, Public Expenditure, Cointegration Tests

References

• AFONSO, A. (2004). A Note on Public Spending Efficiency, Research Reports, CESifo DICE Report 1: 35-39.
• AFONSO, A., Schuknecht, L., Tanzi, V. (2006). Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence for New EU Member States and Emerging Markets, ECB Working Paper, 581.
• AFONSO, A., Romero, A., Monsalve, A. (2013). Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence for Latin America, Inter-American Development Bank, Discussion Paper, 279.
• ALLEN, R., Tommasi, D. (2001). Managing Public Expenditure: A Reference Book for Transition Countries, http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/pe/oecdpemhand book.pdf, (Accessed On: 05.07.2019).
• BOYLE, R. (2006). Measuring Public Sector Productivity: Lesson from International Experience, CPMR Discussion Paper, 35.
• CHAN, S., Karim, M. Z. A. (2012). Public Spending Efficiency and Political and Economic Factors: Evidence from Selected East Asian Countries, Economic Annals, LVII, 193: 7-23.
• CIMA (2011). Public Sector Performance: A Global Perspective, https://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/Thought_leadership_docs/NHS-public sector/ public _sector_report_web_oct_2011.pdf, (Accessed On:07.05.2019).
• DICKEY, D. A., Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time-Series With a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366): 427-431.
• DRUCKER, L., Geva, A. (2013). What Drives Public Sector Performance?, Israel Economic Review, 10(2), 43-69.
• ENGLE, R. F., and Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica: 55, 251–276.
• GRANGER, C. W. J., and Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious Regressions in Econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 2: 111–120.
• GUJARATI, D. M. (2003), Basic Econometrics, Fourth Edition, New York, McGraw-Hill.
• GUPTA, S., Verhoeven, M. (2001). The Efficiency of Government Expenditure Experiences from Africa, Journal of Policy Modeling, 23: 433-467.
• GÜRAN, M. C., Cingi, S. (2002). Devletin Ekonomik Müdahalelerinin Etkinliği, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 3: 56-89.
• JOHANSEN, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12: 231-234.
• JOHANSEN, S. (1991). Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegrated Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models, Econometrica, 59(6): 1551-1580.
• JOHANSEN, S., Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inferences on Cointegration With Applications to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2): 169-210.
• LEOVEANU, A. (2016). Performance Evaluation Systems in the Public Sector, Curentul Juridic, 26-38.
• LOBONT, O. R., Moldovan, N. C., Bociu, A., Chis, C., Brîndescu Olariu, D. (2018). A Factor Analysis of the Public Sector Performance, Significant Differences between Old and New EU Countries, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 52 (2): 139-156.
• LOVRE, I., Ivanović, O. M., Mitić, P. (2017). Analysis of Public Sector Efficiency in Developed Countries, Economic Analysis, 50(1-2): 38-49.
• LUCAS, R. E. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3-42.
• MIHAIU, D. M., Opreana, A., Cristescu, M. P. (2010). Efficiency, Effectiveness and Performance of the Public Sector, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 4: 132-147.
• MIHAIU, D. (2014). Measuring Performance in the Public Sector: Between Necessity and Difficulty, Studies in Business and Economics, 40-50.
• MORENO-ENGUIX, M. R., Lorente Bayona, L. V. (2017). Factors Affecting Public Expenditure Efficiency in Developed Countries, Politics & Policy, 105-143.
• ÖMÜRGÖNÜLŞEN, U. (2002). Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Rising Concern, Problems in Practice and Prospects, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1): 99-134.
• PHILLIPS, P.C.B., and Hansen, B.E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variable regression with I (1) processes, Review of Economic Studies, 57: 99-125.
• PHILLIPS, P. C. B., Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time-Series Regression, Biometrika, 75(2): 334-346.
• PREMCHAND, A. (1996). Issues and New Directions in Public Expenditure Management, IMF Working Paper, 123.
• SAKAL, M., Şahin, E. A. (2008). Kamu Kurumlarında Performans Ölçümü ve Sayıştay Denetimi İlişkisi: Türkiye’deki Düzenlemeler Bakımından Bir Değerlendirme, Sayıştay Dergisi, 68: 3-27.
• SCHWAB, K. (2013). Global Competitivenes Report 2013-2014, World Economic Forum, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf, (Accessed On: 05.07.2019).
• TANZI, V., Afonso, A., Schuknect, L., Veldhuis, N. (2007). Public Sector Efficiency: An International Comparison, The Fraser Institute, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/ default/files/PublicSectorEfficiency.pdf, (Accessed On:12.06.2019).
• WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. (2003). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, Fifth Edition, Mason, Cengage Learning.
• YARAŞIR TÜLÜMCE, S., Yavuz, E. (2018). Tanzi-Schuknecht Modellemesi Çerçevesinde Kamu Kesimi Performansının OECD Ülkeleri Açısından Analizi: Aras Yöntemi. Sosyal, Beşerî ve İdari Bilimlerde Akademik Araştırmalar-V, Edited by L. Aytemiz, E. Karayılmazlar, Ankara.
• YENİCE, E. (2006). Kamu Kesiminde Performans Ölçümü ve Bütçe İlişkisi, Sayıştay Dergisi, 61: 57-68.
• ZAGLER, M., Dürnecker, G. (2003). Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth, Journal of Economic Survey, 17: 397-418.
• ZHONGHUA, C., Ye, W. (2012). Research Frontiers in Public Sector Performance Measurement, Elsevier, Physics Procedia, 25: 793-799.
• ZUGRAVU, B. G., Sava, A. Ş. (2012). Recent Changes in Public Sector Efficiency in Romania: Determinants and Implications, Elsevier, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58: 423-433. 5018 Sayılı Kamu Mali Yönetimi ve Kontrol Kanunu.