Çağdaş Arap Sanatında Fotoğrafik İmgenin Estetik ve Kavramsal Dönüşümü (2010–2022)

Year 2025, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 244 - 270, 31.12.2025

Islam Allboun

https://doi.org/10.29228/sanat.64

Abstract

Bu çalışma, çağdaş Arap sanatında fotoğrafın kullanımını teknik, estetik ve kavramsal boyutlarıyla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmanın önemi, fotoğrafın yalnızca belgesel bir araç değil, aynı zamanda bireysel ve toplumsal hafızayı, kimlik inşasını ve kültürel temsilleri görünür kılan güçlü bir görsel dil olarak işlev görmesinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Çalışmanın varsayımı, fotoğrafik imgenin çağdaş sanatta yeni anlatı biçimleri üreterek hem sanatçıların kişisel deneyimlerini hem de kolektif belleği yansıttığıdır. Bu bağlamda araştırma sorusu, “Fotoğraf çağdaş Arap sanatında hangi estetik ve kavramsal işlevleri üstlenmekte ve sanatçılar tarafından hangi yöntemlerle yeniden yorumlanmaktadır?” şeklinde belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın kapsamını, 2010–2022 yılları arasında Ürdün, Filistin, Lübnan, Mısır, Irak ve Fas’tan seçilen yedi çağdaş sanatçının eserleri oluşturmaktadır. Nitel bir araştırma yaklaşımı benimsenmiş; sanatçı beyanları, sergi katalogları, eleştirel metinler ve çevrim içi arşivler üzerinden betimsel-analitik yöntem uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, sanatçıların fotoğrafı resim, baskı, enstalasyon ve sanatçı kitabı gibi farklı mecralarla bütünleştirerek yeni görsel katmanlar yarattığını; malzeme ve teknik seçimleri üzerinden kimlik, hafıza ve mekân temalarını görünür kıldığını ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç olarak, çalışma fotoğrafın çağdaş Arap sanatındaki işlevlerini sınıflandıran özgün bir çerçeve önermekte ve bu işlevlerin sanatçının kişisel deneyimlerini toplumsal bağlamla ilişkilendirdiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

: fotoğraf , çağdaş Arap sanatı , hafıza , kimlik , malzeme

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmada etik kurul izni gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktadır. Araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygun hareket edilmiştir.

Supporting Institution

Bu çalışma herhangi bir kurum/kuruluş tarafından desteklenmemiştir

The Aesthetic and Conceptual Transformation of the Photographic Image in Contemporary Arab Art (2010–2022)

Abstract

This study aims to examine the use of photography in contemporary Arab art in its technical, aesthetic, and conceptual dimensions. The significance of the research lies in the fact that photography functions not only as a documentary tool but also as a powerful visual language that reveals individual and collective memory, identity formation, and cultural representations. The study's premise is that the photographic image, by generating new narrative forms, reflects both the personal experiences of the artists and the collective memory. In this context, the research question is formulated as: “What aesthetic and conceptual functions does photography undertake in contemporary Arab art, and through which methods is it reinterpreted by artists?” The scope of the study consists of works of seven contemporary Arab artists from Jordan, Palestine, Lebanon, Egypt, Iraq, and Morocco between 2010 and 2022. A qualitative research approach was adopted, applying a descriptive-analytical method based on artist statements, exhibition catalogues, critical texts, and online archives. The findings reveal that the artists integrate photography with painting, printmaking, installation, and the artist’s book, thereby creating new visual layers and highlighting themes of identity, memory, and space through their choices of material and technique. In conclusion, the study proposes an original framework that classifies the functions of photography in contemporary Arab art and demonstrates how these functions relate the artists’ personal experiences to broader social contexts.

Keywords

photography , contemporary Arab art , memory , identity , material

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmada etik kurul izni gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktadır. Araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygun hareket edilmiştir.

Supporting Institution

Bu çalışma herhangi bir kurum/kuruluş tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

References

• Adato, R. (2010). Modernity, photography, and history painting in Manet’s Execution of Maximilian. Berkeley Undergraduate Journal, 23(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5070/B3231007679
• Aleksiuk, N. (2000). “A thousand angles”: Photographic irony in the work of Julia Margaret Cameron and Virginia Woolf. Mosaic, 33(2), 125–140.
• Alhamamsi, M. (2009). The details of life in (details) Hani Hourani. https://elaph.com/Web/Culture/2009/3/424784.html
• Al-Shamali, B. M., & Al-Sayed, A. (2013). The concept of movement in the modern art of sculpture. Damascus University Journal, 29(1), 723–737.
• Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press.
• Barthes, R. (1980). La chambre claire: Note sur la photographie. Gallimard.
• Batniji, T. (t.y.). Bio. Taysir Batniji Official Website. https://www.taysirbatniji.com/bio-2/
• Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Çev.). University of Michigan Press. (Orijinal çalışma 1981’de yayımlanmıştır)
• Benjamin, W. (2008). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Penguin UK.
• Brodger, M. (2012, October 19). Photography: Is it art? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2012/oct/19/photography-is-it-art
• Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. MIT Press.
• Dzwonkoska, A. (2010). Photography and sculpture: The multifaceted relation of sculpture to photography and new media in the light of the evolving concept of sculpture. Art Inquiry: Recherches sur les arts, 12(21), 53–66.
• Galassi, P. (1981). Before photography: Painting and the invention of photography. Museum of Modern Art.
• Gernsheim, H. (1982). The history of photography: From the camera obscura to the beginning of the modern era (4th rev. ed.). Thames & Hudson.
• Gombrich, E. H. (2000). The story of art (16th ed.). Phaidon Press.
• Groen, K. (2007). Painting technique in the seventeenth century in Holland and the possible use of the camera obscura by Vermeer. In Inside the camera obscura—Optics and art under the spell of the projected image (pp. 195–210).
• Gurshtein, K. (2007). The mountain and the mole-hill: Julia Margaret Cameron’s allegories. Bulletin of the University of Michigan Museums of Art and Archaeology, 17.
• Hammer, M. (2012). Francis Bacon: Painting after photography. Art History, 35(2), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.2011.00890.x
• Kandinsky, W. (1982). Concerning the spiritual in art (M. T. H. Sadler, Çev.). Dover Publications. (Orijinal çalışma 1911’de yayımlanmıştır)
• Kearney, R. (1988). The wake of imagination: Toward a postmodern culture. Routledge.
• Kutlisa, M. (2011). On the relationship between land art and photography: The cases of Boris Demur and Gorgona. Journal of Contemporary Aesthetics, 9(3), 41–55.
• Laxton, S. (2012). As photography: Mechanicity, contingency, and other-determination in Gerhard Richter’s overpainted snapshots. Critical Inquiry, 38(4), 776–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/667424
• Lewis, K. (2013). The conversation between painting and photography in the 21st century: An analysis of selected paintings by Peter Doig and Luc Tuymans. Journal of Contemporary Painting, 1(1), 89–108.
• Makin, J. (2009). Painting everyday life: Fulfilling Baudelaire’s challenge through photographically driven painting. Art Journal, 68(2), 45–62.
• Mensah, T. (2009). Dialectical dialogues in postmodern sculpture (Doctoral dissertation). Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology.
• Nye, D. E. (1975). Image worlds: Corporate identities at General Electric, 1900–1930. MIT Press.
• Ocvirk, O. G., Stinson, R. E., Wigg, P. R., Bone, R. O., & Cayton, D. L. (2012). Art fundamentals: Theory and practice (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Panofsky, E. (1955). The life and art of Albrecht Dürer. Princeton University Press.
• Reichelt, V. (2005). Painting’s wrongful death: The revivalist practices of Glenn Brown and Gerhard Richter (Unpublished master’s thesis). Griffith University.
• Rashid, A. (2014). Art, reality, and the object. Routledge.
• Statton, D. (2012). The “anti-photographic” photography of Pablo Picasso and its influence on the development of the movement now known as Cubism (Doctoral dissertation). Washington and Lee University.
• Terziyska, T. (2012). Gerhard Richter and Antoni Tàpies: Matter and identity. Journal of Modern Art Studies, 5(2), 55–73.
• Ulbricht, J. (2000). Learning from the art of self-taught artists. Art Education, 53(4), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2000.11652401
• Van Gelder, H., & Westgeest, H. (2009). Photography and painting in multi-mediating pictures. Visual Culture Studies, 4(1), 59–70.
• Winegar, J. (2008). A hometown artist of the world: Sabah Naim (visual artist in Egypt). In M. A. Cooke & B. Lawrence (Eds.), Muslim voices and lives in the contemporary world (pp. 149–161). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611924_12
• Zulak, M. (2015). Hannah Höch’s photomontage-paintings (Doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University.