Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public

Year 2010, Volume: 34 Issue: 268, 281 - 300, 27.02.2014

Volkan Ediger Çiğdem Kentmen

Abstract

References

  • Carrera, Diana ve Alexander Mack (2010). “Sustainability Essessment of Energy Technologies via Social Indicators: Results of a Survey Among European Energy Experts,” Energy Policy, C. 38, S. 2, s. 1030–1039.
  • Darby, Sarah (2006). “Social Learning and Public Policy: Lessons from an Energy-Conscious Village,” Energy Policy, C. 34, S. 17, 2929–2940.
  • Ediger, Volkan Ş. ve Elçin Kentel (1999). “Renewable Energy Potential as an Alternative to Fossil Fuels in Turkey,” Energy Conversion and Management, C. 40, S. 7, s. 743–755.
  • Ediger, Volkan Ş. ve Hüseyin Tatlıdil (2006). “Energy as an Indicator of Human Development: A Statistical Approach,” Journal of Energy and Development, C. 31, S. 2, s. 213–232.
  • Gambro, John ve Harvey N. Swiztky (1999). “Variables Associated with American High School Students’ Knowledge of Environmental Issues Related to Energy and Pollution,” Journal of Environmental Education, C, 30, S. 2, s.15–23.
  • Gnansounou, Edgard (2010). “Vulnerability of the Economy to the Potential Disturbances of Energy Supply: A Logic-Based Model with Application to the Case of China,” Energy Policy, C. 38, S. 6, 2846–2857.
  • Greenberg, Michael (2009). “Energy Sources, Public Policy and Public Preferences,” Energy Policy, C. 37, S. 8, s. 3242–3249.
  • Hürriyet, “Bakan’dan Nükleer Üniversite Teklifi,” http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew. aspx?id=15493445, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Hürriyet, “Nükleere Karşı Cazlı Protesto,” http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew. aspx?id=14610955, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Hürriyet, “Çernobil Kazasının 24. Yılı,” http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew. aspx?id=14519476, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010). Goldemberg, José, Thomas Johansson, Amulya K.H. Reddy ve Robert H. Williams (1985). “An EndUse Oriented Global Energy Strategy,” Annual Review of Energy, C. 10, s. 613–688.
  • Jun, Eunju, Won Joon Kim, Yong Hoon Jeong ve Soon Heung Chang (2010). “Measuring the Social Value of Nuclear Energy Using Contingent Valuation Methodology,” Energy Policy, C. 38, S. 3, s. 1470– 1476.
  • Kaldellis, John (2005). “Social Attitude towards Wind Energy Applications in Greece,” Energy Policy, C. 33, S. 5, s. 595–602.
  • Kıvanç, Ahmet, “Nükleer Kapıya Dayandı,” Radikal, http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aT ype=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=831024&Date=03.09.2010&CategoryID=97 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Kıvanç, Ahmet, “TAEK’ten Nükleer Güvence,” Radikal, http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx? aType=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=831214&Date=03.09.2010&CategoryID=97 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Krugmann, Hartmut ve José Goldemberg (1983). “The Energy Cost of Satisfying Basic Human Needs,” Energy Policy, C. 24, S. 1, s. 45–60.
  • Loveday, Dennis L., T.Bhamra, T.Tang, V.J.A.Haines, M.J.Holmes ve R.J.Green (2008). The Energy and Monetary Implications of the ‘24/7’‘Always on’ Society,” Energy Policy, C. 36, S. 12, s. 4639–4645. 300 mülkiye 2010 Cilt: XXXIV Sayı:268
  • Miranda, Marie Lynn ve Brack Hale (1997). “Waste not, Want not: The Private and Social Costs of Waste-to-Energy Production,” Energy Policy, C. 25, S. 6, s. 587–600.
  • Mirasgedis, S., D. Diakoulaki, L. Papagiannakis ve A. Zervos (2000). “Impact of Social Costing on the Competitiveness of Renewable Energies: The Case of Crete,” Energy Policy, C. 28, S. 1, s. 65–73.
  • Öğütçen, Murat (2009). “Makineci Permak Enerji Sektöründe Güneşle Büyüyecek,” Radikal, http:// www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aType=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=962585&Date=03.09.2010 &CategoryID=101 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Pohl, Christian ve Priska Gisler (2003). “Barriers and Opportunities in Realising Sustainable Energy Concepts: An Analysis of Two Swiss Case Studies,” Energy Policy, C. 31, S. 2, s. 175–183.
  • Protman, Michelle (2009). “Involving the Public in the Impact Assessment of Offshore Renewable Energy Facilities,” Marine Policy, C. 33, S. 2, s. 332–338.
  • Radikal, “TSKB 420 milyon dolarlık Dünya Bankası Kredisini ‘Enerji’ye Açtı,” http://www.radikal. com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aType=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=951280&Date=03.09.2010&Category ID=101 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Saysel, Ali K., “Türkiye-Rusya Nükleer Anlaşması,” Radikal, http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.as px?aType=RadikalEklerDetay&ArticleID=999911&Date=03.09.2010&CategoryID=42, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Schulz, Thorsten F., Socrates Kypreos, Leonardo Barretob ve Alexander Wokaun (2008). “Intermediate Steps towards the 2000 W Society in Switzerland: An Energy–Economic Scenario Analysis,” Energy Policy, C. 36, N. 4, s. 1303–1317;
  • Sözen, Adnan, Erol Arçaklıoğlu, Mehmet Özalp ve E. Galip Kanıt (2004). “Use of Artificial Neural Networks for Mapping of Solar Potential in Turkey,” Applied Energy, C. 77, S. 3, s. 273–286. Starr, Chauncey (1971). “Energy and Power,” Scientific American, C. 225, S. 3, s. 37-49. Trainer, Ted (1995). “Can Renewable Energy Sources Sustain Affluent Society?,” Energy Policy, C. 23, S. 12, s. 1009-1026.
  • Tüfekçi, Hasan, “Sinop Kalesi’ni Fethettiler,” Hürriyet, http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew. aspx?id=14541049, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Van der Pligt, Joop, J. Richard Eiser ve Russell Spears (1984). “Public Attitudes to Nuclear Energy,” Energy Policy, C. 12, S. 3, s. 302–305.
  • Von Lazar, Arpad ve Bruce Magid (1975). “Energy Policy and Social Development: Notes on TrinidadTobago and Venezuela”, Energy Policy, C. 3, S. 3, s. 201–210. Weisz, Paul B. (2006). “Future Energy Supply for Society – Challenges in Evaluation Criteria and Interdisciplinary Research,” Vacuum, C. 80, S. 3, s. 1048–1052.
  • Yılmaz, Zerrin (2006). “Akıllı Binalar ve Yenilenebilir Enerji,” Tesisat Mühendisliği Dergisi, C. 91, s. 7–15.

Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public

Year 2010, Volume: 34 Issue: 268, 281 - 300, 27.02.2014

Volkan Ediger Çiğdem Kentmen

Abstract

Bu çalışma Türk toplumunun enerji tercihlerini, geleceğin enerjisi, enerji verimliliği
ve yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları başlıkları altında incelemektedir. 2005–2006 yıllarında
AB tarafından düzenlenmiş üç farklı Avrobarometre anketinin enerjiyle ilgili bölümlerinin
kullanıldığı bu çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlara göre, Türk halkı güneş ve nükleer enerjiye hayli
destek vermektedir fakat enerji verimliliğinin ve yenilenebilir enerjinin payının artırılması
için gerekli olan teşviklerin maddi yükünü üstlenmeye razı değildir. Bunun yanı sıra, Türk
toplumunda enerji kaynakları konusunda ciddi eksikliği bulunmaktadır ve hükümetin kendisine
daha çok bilgi sağlamasını talep etmektedir.

Keywords

- Sosyal enerji Türk kamuoyu enerji tercihleri

References

  • Carrera, Diana ve Alexander Mack (2010). “Sustainability Essessment of Energy Technologies via Social Indicators: Results of a Survey Among European Energy Experts,” Energy Policy, C. 38, S. 2, s. 1030–1039.
  • Darby, Sarah (2006). “Social Learning and Public Policy: Lessons from an Energy-Conscious Village,” Energy Policy, C. 34, S. 17, 2929–2940.
  • Ediger, Volkan Ş. ve Elçin Kentel (1999). “Renewable Energy Potential as an Alternative to Fossil Fuels in Turkey,” Energy Conversion and Management, C. 40, S. 7, s. 743–755.
  • Ediger, Volkan Ş. ve Hüseyin Tatlıdil (2006). “Energy as an Indicator of Human Development: A Statistical Approach,” Journal of Energy and Development, C. 31, S. 2, s. 213–232.
  • Gambro, John ve Harvey N. Swiztky (1999). “Variables Associated with American High School Students’ Knowledge of Environmental Issues Related to Energy and Pollution,” Journal of Environmental Education, C, 30, S. 2, s.15–23.
  • Gnansounou, Edgard (2010). “Vulnerability of the Economy to the Potential Disturbances of Energy Supply: A Logic-Based Model with Application to the Case of China,” Energy Policy, C. 38, S. 6, 2846–2857.
  • Greenberg, Michael (2009). “Energy Sources, Public Policy and Public Preferences,” Energy Policy, C. 37, S. 8, s. 3242–3249.
  • Hürriyet, “Bakan’dan Nükleer Üniversite Teklifi,” http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew. aspx?id=15493445, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Hürriyet, “Nükleere Karşı Cazlı Protesto,” http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew. aspx?id=14610955, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Hürriyet, “Çernobil Kazasının 24. Yılı,” http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew. aspx?id=14519476, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010). Goldemberg, José, Thomas Johansson, Amulya K.H. Reddy ve Robert H. Williams (1985). “An EndUse Oriented Global Energy Strategy,” Annual Review of Energy, C. 10, s. 613–688.
  • Jun, Eunju, Won Joon Kim, Yong Hoon Jeong ve Soon Heung Chang (2010). “Measuring the Social Value of Nuclear Energy Using Contingent Valuation Methodology,” Energy Policy, C. 38, S. 3, s. 1470– 1476.
  • Kaldellis, John (2005). “Social Attitude towards Wind Energy Applications in Greece,” Energy Policy, C. 33, S. 5, s. 595–602.
  • Kıvanç, Ahmet, “Nükleer Kapıya Dayandı,” Radikal, http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aT ype=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=831024&Date=03.09.2010&CategoryID=97 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Kıvanç, Ahmet, “TAEK’ten Nükleer Güvence,” Radikal, http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx? aType=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=831214&Date=03.09.2010&CategoryID=97 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Krugmann, Hartmut ve José Goldemberg (1983). “The Energy Cost of Satisfying Basic Human Needs,” Energy Policy, C. 24, S. 1, s. 45–60.
  • Loveday, Dennis L., T.Bhamra, T.Tang, V.J.A.Haines, M.J.Holmes ve R.J.Green (2008). The Energy and Monetary Implications of the ‘24/7’‘Always on’ Society,” Energy Policy, C. 36, S. 12, s. 4639–4645. 300 mülkiye 2010 Cilt: XXXIV Sayı:268
  • Miranda, Marie Lynn ve Brack Hale (1997). “Waste not, Want not: The Private and Social Costs of Waste-to-Energy Production,” Energy Policy, C. 25, S. 6, s. 587–600.
  • Mirasgedis, S., D. Diakoulaki, L. Papagiannakis ve A. Zervos (2000). “Impact of Social Costing on the Competitiveness of Renewable Energies: The Case of Crete,” Energy Policy, C. 28, S. 1, s. 65–73.
  • Öğütçen, Murat (2009). “Makineci Permak Enerji Sektöründe Güneşle Büyüyecek,” Radikal, http:// www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aType=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=962585&Date=03.09.2010 &CategoryID=101 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Pohl, Christian ve Priska Gisler (2003). “Barriers and Opportunities in Realising Sustainable Energy Concepts: An Analysis of Two Swiss Case Studies,” Energy Policy, C. 31, S. 2, s. 175–183.
  • Protman, Michelle (2009). “Involving the Public in the Impact Assessment of Offshore Renewable Energy Facilities,” Marine Policy, C. 33, S. 2, s. 332–338.
  • Radikal, “TSKB 420 milyon dolarlık Dünya Bankası Kredisini ‘Enerji’ye Açtı,” http://www.radikal. com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aType=RadikalHaberDetay&ArticleID=951280&Date=03.09.2010&Category ID=101 (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Saysel, Ali K., “Türkiye-Rusya Nükleer Anlaşması,” Radikal, http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.as px?aType=RadikalEklerDetay&ArticleID=999911&Date=03.09.2010&CategoryID=42, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Schulz, Thorsten F., Socrates Kypreos, Leonardo Barretob ve Alexander Wokaun (2008). “Intermediate Steps towards the 2000 W Society in Switzerland: An Energy–Economic Scenario Analysis,” Energy Policy, C. 36, N. 4, s. 1303–1317;
  • Sözen, Adnan, Erol Arçaklıoğlu, Mehmet Özalp ve E. Galip Kanıt (2004). “Use of Artificial Neural Networks for Mapping of Solar Potential in Turkey,” Applied Energy, C. 77, S. 3, s. 273–286. Starr, Chauncey (1971). “Energy and Power,” Scientific American, C. 225, S. 3, s. 37-49. Trainer, Ted (1995). “Can Renewable Energy Sources Sustain Affluent Society?,” Energy Policy, C. 23, S. 12, s. 1009-1026.
  • Tüfekçi, Hasan, “Sinop Kalesi’ni Fethettiler,” Hürriyet, http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/ShowNew. aspx?id=14541049, (Erişim tarihi: 03.09.2010).
  • Van der Pligt, Joop, J. Richard Eiser ve Russell Spears (1984). “Public Attitudes to Nuclear Energy,” Energy Policy, C. 12, S. 3, s. 302–305.
  • Von Lazar, Arpad ve Bruce Magid (1975). “Energy Policy and Social Development: Notes on TrinidadTobago and Venezuela”, Energy Policy, C. 3, S. 3, s. 201–210. Weisz, Paul B. (2006). “Future Energy Supply for Society – Challenges in Evaluation Criteria and Interdisciplinary Research,” Vacuum, C. 80, S. 3, s. 1048–1052.
  • Yılmaz, Zerrin (2006). “Akıllı Binalar ve Yenilenebilir Enerji,” Tesisat Mühendisliği Dergisi, C. 91, s. 7–15.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Previous Issue
Authors

Volkan Ediger This is me

Çiğdem Kentmen This is me

Publication Date February 27, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 34 Issue: 268

Cite

APA Ediger, V., & Kentmen, Ç. (2014). Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public. Mülkiye Dergisi, 34(268), 281-300.
AMA Ediger V, Kentmen Ç. Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public. Mülkiye Dergisi. February 2014;34(268):281-300.
Chicago Ediger, Volkan, and Çiğdem Kentmen. “Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu Ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public”. Mülkiye Dergisi 34, no. 268 (February 2014): 281-300.
EndNote Ediger V, Kentmen Ç (February 1, 2014) Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public. Mülkiye Dergisi 34 268 281–300.
IEEE V. Ediger and Ç. Kentmen, “Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public”, Mülkiye Dergisi, vol. 34, no. 268, pp. 281–300, 2014.
ISNAD Ediger, Volkan - Kentmen, Çiğdem. “Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu Ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public”. Mülkiye Dergisi 34/268 (February 2014), 281-300.
JAMA Ediger V, Kentmen Ç. Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public. Mülkiye Dergisi. 2014;34:281–300.
MLA Ediger, Volkan and Çiğdem Kentmen. “Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu Ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public”. Mülkiye Dergisi, vol. 34, no. 268, 2014, pp. 281-00.
Vancouver Ediger V, Kentmen Ç. Enerjinin Toplumsal Boyutu ve Türk Halkının Enerji Tercihleri / Social Dimension of Energy and Energy Choices of Turkish Public. Mülkiye Dergisi. 2014;34(268):281-300.
 Download Cover Image
Mülkiye Dergisi: Mülkiyeliler Birliği Konur Sokak No. 1, Kızılay - ANKARA, TÜRKİYE. Tel: +90 312 4185572; Faks: +90 312 4191373; mulkiyedergisi@mulkiye.org.tr / Mülkiye Dergisi, Mülkiyeliler Birliği Genel Merkezi Yayın Organı'dır.