Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Environmental opportunities of aquatic insects in nanotechnology

Year 2021, Volume: Volume 1 Issue: Issue 1, 24 - 29, 16.10.2021

Abstract

Nanotechnology plays an important role opportunity in several industries, biotechnology, medicine, and environments by creating new opportunities. These roles may be developed for recyclability, to prevent environmental pollution and performance of countless products. For example, in terms of environmental protection, nanotechnology has every possible method. The most influential members of the environment are insects in terms of species numbers-varieties. For this reason, in terms of the sustainability of these areas, it is important to analyze insects in more detail, especially in freshwater. If these details are obtained, it can only be feasible with nano-scale research that current and evolving technology. The purpose of this review is to investigate to take lead in the formation of ideas that will enable the discovery of new features about correlations between aquatic insects and nanotechnology. It is expected that this review will enable us to explore the latest ecological data and will lead us to new methodological approaches on nano-scale for aquatic insects.

References

  • 1. Robinson, W. Insect and mite pests in the human environment. In Urban Entomology; Taylor & Francis: New York, USA, 1995; p. 448 ISBN 0 412 60750 6.
  • 2. Calizza, E.; Rossi, L.; Careddu, G.; Sporta Caputi, S.; Costantini, M.L. A novel approach to quantifying trophic interaction strengths and impact of invasive species in food webs. Biological Invasions 2021, 23, 2093–2107, doi:10.1007/s10530-021-02490-y.
  • 3. Wen, Y.; Schoups, G.; van de Giesen, N. Organic pollution of rivers: Combined threats of urbanization, livestock farming and global climate change. Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 43289, doi:10.1038/srep43289.
  • 4. Palmer, M.A. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in Freshwater Sediments. Ambio 1997, 26, 571–577.
  • 5. Benson, J.A.; Stewart, B.A.; Close, P.G.; Lymbery, A.J. Freshwater mussels in Mediterranean‐climate regions: Species richness, conservation status, threats, and Conservation Actions Needed. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 2021, 31, 708–728, doi:10.1002/aqc.3511.
  • 6. Sitre, S.R. Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Aquatic Insects of a Rural Fresh Water Reservoir of Bhadrawati Tehsil in Chandrapur District. Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal 2013, 3, 51–55.
  • 7. Duffus, N.E.; Christie, C.R.; Morimoto, J. Insect Cultural Services: How Insects Have Changed Our Lives and How Can We Do Better for Them. Insects 2021, 12, 377, doi:10.3390/insects12050377.
  • 8. Choudhary, A.; Ahi, J. Biodiversity of Freshwater Insects: A Review. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES) 2015, 4, 25–31.
  • 9. Hauer, F.R.; Resh, V.H. Macroinvertebrates. In Methods in Stream Ecology, Volume 1; Hauer, F.R., Lamberti Volume 1 (Third Edition), G.A.B.T.-M. in S.E., Eds.; Academic Press: Boston, 2017; pp. 297–319 ISBN 978-0-12-416558-8.
  • 10. Parmesan, C.; Ryrholm, N.; Stefanescu, C.; Hill, J.K.; Thomas, C.D.; Descimon, H.; Huntley, B.; Kaila, L.; Kullberg, J.; Tammaru, T.; et al. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 1999, 399, 579–583, doi:10.1038/21181.
  • 11. Al-Jasimee, A.S.; Abed, S.A.; Salim, M.A.; Jabbar Harjan, Q. Studying the Diversity of Freshwater Ecosystems in Iraq. Do We Need Different Approaches? Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2020, 1664, 012141, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1664/1/012141.
  • 12. Porwal, P.; Porwal, S.; Singh, S.P.; Husen, A.; Singh, A.K. Improving futuristic nanomaterial researches in forestry sector: an overview. In Nanomaterials for Agriculture and Forestry Applications; Elsevier, 2020; pp. 505–518.
  • 13. Awasthi, M.K.; Sarsaiya, S.; Wainaina, S.; Rajendran, K.; Kumar, S.; Quan, W.; Duan, Y.; Awasthi, S.K.; Chen, H.; Pandey, A.; et al. A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019, 111, 115–131, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.017.
  • 14. Singh, M.; Jampaiah, D.; Kandjani, A.E.; Sabri, Y.M.; Della Gaspera, E.; Reineck, P.; Judd, M.; Langley, J.; Cox, N.; van Embden, J.; et al. Oxygen-deficient photostable Cu2O for enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 6039–6050, doi:10.1039/C7NR08388B.
  • 15. Nisancı, F.B.; Demir, Ü. Size-Controlled Electrochemical Growth of PbS Nanostructures into Electrochemically Patterned Self-Assembled Monolayers. Langmuir 2012, 28, 8571–8578, doi:10.1021/la301377r.
  • 16. Karim, M.N.; Anderson, S.R.; Singh, S.; Ramanathan, R.; Bansal, V. Nanostructured silver fabric as a free-standing NanoZyme for colorimetric detection of glucose in urine. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2018, 110, 8–15, doi:10.1016/j.bios.2018.03.025.
  • 17. Lee, L.P.; Szema, R. Inspirations from Biological Optics for Advanced Photonic Systems. Science 2005, 310, 1148–1150, doi:10.1126/science.1115248.
  • 18. Ravi Kumar, M.N.. A review of chitin and chitosan applications. Reactive and Functional Polymers 2000, 46, 1–27, doi:10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-9.
  • 19. Huo, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.-Q.; Jiang, Y.; Lambert, T.N.; Fang, E. A New Class of Silica Cross-Linked Micellar Core−Shell Nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2006, 128, 6447–6453, doi:10.1021/ja060367p.
  • 20. Goswami, A.; Roy, I.; Sengupta, S.; Debnath, N. Novel applications of solid and liquid formulations of nanoparticles against insect pests and pathogens. Thin Solid Films 2010, 519, 1252–1257, doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2010.08.079.
  • 21. Lasic, D.D. Doxorubicin in sterically stabilized liposomes. Nature 1996, 380, 561–562, doi:10.1038/380561a0.
  • 22. Merkt, F. Interactions of nanoparticles and surfaces, Universitat Konstanz, 2008.
  • 23. Bhattacharyya, A.; Bhaumik, A.; Rani, P.; Mandal, S.; Epidi, T. Nano-particles - A recent approach to insect pest control. African Journal of Biotechnology 2010, 9, 3489–3493.
  • 24. Maler, K.-G.; Aniyar, S.; Jansson, A. Accounting for ecosystem services as a way to understand the requirements for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105, 9501–9506, doi:10.1073/pnas.0708856105.
  • 25. Naiman, R.J. Animal Influences on Ecosystem Dynamics: Large animals are more than passive components of ecological systems. BioScience 1988, 38, 750–752, doi:10.2307/1310783.
  • 26. Ramírez, A.; Gutiérrez-Fonseca, P.E. Functional feeding groups of aquatic insect families in Latin America: a critical analysis and review of existing literature. Revista de Biología Tropical 2014, 62, 155, doi:10.15517/rbt.v62i0.15785.
  • 27. Blakely, T.J.; Harding, J.S.; Mcintosh, A.R.; Winterbourn, M.J. Barriers to the recovery of aquatic insect communities in urban streams. Freshwater Biology 2006, 51, 1634–1645, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01601.x.
  • 28. Rees, D.P. Coleoptera. In Integrated Management of Insects in Stored Products; CRC Press, 1996; p. 39 ISBN 9780203750612.
  • 29. Bektaş, M.; Orhan, F.; Erman, Ö.K.; Barış, Ö. Bacterial microbiota on digestive structure of Cybister lateralimarginalis torquatus (Fischer von Waldheim, 1829) (Dytiscidae: Coleoptera). Archives of Microbiology 2021, 203, 635–641, doi:10.1007/s00203-020-02049-w.
  • 30. Demirsoy, A. Life Basic Rules, Invertebrates/Insects: Entomology, Headband II/Section II (Turkish); 5th ed.; Meteksan Printing: Ankara, 1997; ISBN 9786054460335.
  • 31. Gillott, C. The Remaining Endopterygote Orders - 5. Coleoptera. In Entomology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005; pp. 305–326 ISBN 1-4020-3184-X.
  • 32. Jäch, M.A.; Balke, M. Global diversity of water beetles (Coleoptera) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 2008, 595, 419–442, doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9117-y.
  • 33. Darilmaz, M.; Kiyak, S. a Contribution To the Knowledge of the Turkish Water Beetles Fauna (Coleoptera). Munis Entomology and Zoology 2006, 1, 129–144.
  • 34. Darilmaz, M.C.; Kiyak, S. Checklist of Gyrinidae, Haliplidae, Noteridae and Dytiscidae of Turkey (Coleoptera: Adephaga). Journal of Natural History 2009, 43, 1585–1636, doi:10.1080/00222930902993682.
  • 35. Darilmaz, M.; Kiyak, S. New and rare water beetles (Coleoptera: Haliplidae: Dytiscidae) for the fauna of Turkey. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 2010, 62, 99–102.
  • 36. Erman, Ö.K.; Erman, O. First records of Oreodytes Seidlitz, 1887 (Dytiscidae, Coleoptera) from Turkey: Oreodytes septentrionalis (Gyllenhal, 1826) and Oreodytes davisii (Curtis, 1831). Turkish Journal of Zoology 2002, 26, 295–299.
  • 37. Erman, Ö.K.; Erman, O. First record of Graptodytes bilineatus (Sturm, 1835) (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology 2004, 28, 87–90.
  • 38. Angus, R.B. Revisional notes on Helophorus F. (Col., Hydrophilidae) 1. General introduction and some species resembling H. minutus F. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 1969, 105, 1–24.
  • 39. Angus, R.B. A revision of the beetles of the genus Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) subgeneral Orphelophorus d’Orchymont, Gephelophorus Sharp and Meghelophorus Kuwert. Acta Zoologica Fennica 1970, 129, 1-62.
  • 40. Angus, R.B. Süsswasserfauna von Mitteleuropa - Insecta: Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae: Helophorinae; Verlag, G.F., Ed.; Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 1992; ISBN 978-3437306433.
  • 41. Angus, R.B. A re-evaluation of the Helophorus flavipes group of species (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), based on chromosomal analysis, larva and biology. Nouvelle Revue d’Entomologie 1996, 13, 111–122.
  • 42. Angus, R.B. A New Turkish Helophorus, with notes on H. griseus Herbstand H. montanus d’ Orchymont (Col., Hydrophiloidea). Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 1998, 134, 5–9.
  • 43. Darilmaz, M.C.; İncekara, Ü. Checklist of Hydrophiloidea of Turkey (Coleoptera: Polyphaga). Journal of Natural History 2011, 45, 685–735, doi:10.1080/00222933.2010.535916.
  • 44. Smetana, A. Revision of the subfamily Helophorinae of the Nearctic region (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 1985, 117, 3–154, doi:10.4039/entm117131fv.
  • 45. Hansen, M. The Hydrophiloid Beetles. Phylogeny, Classification and A revision of the genera (Coleoptera, Hydrophiloidea). Biologiske Skrifter, The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters 1991, 1–368.
  • 46. Angus, R.B. Revisional studies on east palearctic and some nearctic species of Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Acta Zoologica Hungarica 1970.
  • 47. Angus, R.B. Revisional notes on Helophorus F. (Col., Hydrophilidae) 2. The complex round H. flavipes F. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 1971, 106, 129–148.
  • 48. Angus, R.B. Revisional notes on Helophorus F. (Col., Hydrophilidae) 3. Species resembling H. strigifrons Thoms. and some further notes on species resembling H. minutus F. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 1971, 106, 238–256.
  • 49. Angus, R.B. Separation of Helophorus grandis, maritimus and occidentalis sp.n. (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) by banded chromosome analysis. Systematic Entomology 1983, 8, 1–13, doi:10.1111/j.1365-3113.1983.tb00462.x.
  • 50. Angus, R.B. Towards a revision of the palearctic species of Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) I. Entomological Review 1984, 63, 89–119.
  • 51. Angus, R.B. A new species of Helophorus F. (Col., Hydrophilidae) from northern Spain. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 1985, 121, 89-90.
  • 52. Angus, R.B. A New Species of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) from Mongolia. Results of the Mongolian-German Biological Expeditions since 1962, No. 148. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin. Zoologisches Museum und Institut für Spezielle Zoologie (Berlin) 1985, 61, 163–164, doi:10.1002/mmnz.19850610112.
  • 53. Angus, R.B. Notes on the Helophorus (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) occurring in Turkey, Iran and neighbouring territories. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 1988, 95, 209–248, doi:10.5962/bhl.part.79649.
  • 54. Hansen, M. World Catalogue of Insects, Volume 1: Hydraenidae (coleoptera); Apollo Books: Stenstrup-Denmark., 1998; ISBN 978-8788757279.
  • 55. Hansen, M. World Catalogue of Insects, Volume 2: Hydrophiloidea (Coleoptera); Apollo Books: Stenstrup-Denmark, 1998;
  • 56. Hebauerå, F. The Hydrophiloidea of Israel and the Sinai (Coleoptera, Hydrophiloidea). Zoology in the Middle East 1994, 10, 73–138, doi:10.1080/09397140.1994.10637663.
  • 57. Spangler, P.J. Four new stygobiontic beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae; Noteridae; Elmidae). Insecta Mundi 1996, 10, 241.
  • 58. Jäch, M.A.; Kasapoglu, A. Hydraena (s. str.) emineae sp. n. from Antalya, southern Turkey (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Zootaxa 2006, 1133, 39, doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1133.1.2.
  • 59. Kodada, J.; Jäch, M.A. Dryopidae: 1. Checklist and bibliography of the Dryopidae of China (Coleoptera). Water Beetles of China 1995, 1, 325–328.
  • 60. Braun, B.M.; Salvarrey, A.V.B.; Kotzian, C.B.; Spies, M.R.; Pires, M.M. Diversity and distribution of riffle beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Elmidae) in montane rivers of Southern Brazil. Biota Neotropica 2014, 14, doi:10.1590/1676-060320140615183046.
  • 61. Webster, R.; DeMerchant, I. New Coleoptera records from New Brunswick, Canada: Dryopidae, Elmidae, Psephenidae, and Ptilodactylidae. ZooKeys 2012, 179, 67–75, doi:10.3897/zookeys.179.2604.
  • 62. Taşar, G.E. Checklist of dryopidae and elmidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) of Turkey. Biharean Biologist 2018, 12, 1–6.
  • 63. Clarke, R.O.S. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects, Coleoptera Heteroceridae. Royal Entomological Society of London 1973, 5, 1–15.
  • 64. Aguilera, P.; Mascagni, A.; Ribera, I. The family Heteroceridae MacLeay, 1825 (Coleoptera, Dryopoidea) in the Iberian peninsula and the Balearic Islands. Miscellania Zoologica 1998, 21, 75–100.
  • 65. Mascagni, A. Heteroceridae: Check list of the Heteroceridae of China and Neighbouring countries, and descriptionof two new species (Coleoptera). Water Beetles of China 1995, 1, 341–348.
  • 66. Tasar, G. A contribution to the knowledge of Turkish dryopidae, Elmidae and heteroceridae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) fauna. Archives of Biological Sciences 2014, 66, 1473–1478, doi:10.2298/ABS1404473T.
  • 67. Horikoshi, K.; Bull, A.T. Prologue: Definition, Categories, Distribution, Origin and Evolution, Pioneering Studies, and Emerging Fields of Extremophiles. In Extremophiles Handbook; Horikoshi, K., Ed.; Springer Japan: Tokyo, 2011; pp. 3–15.
  • 68. Li, H.; Zeng, J.; Ren, L.; Yan, Q.; Wu, Q.L. Enhanced Metabolic Potentials and Functional Gene Interactions of Microbial Stress Responses to a 4,100-m Elevational Increase in Freshwater Lakes. Frontiers in Microbiology 2021, 11, 595967, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.595967.
  • 69. Santacruz-Toloza, L.; Perozo, E.; Papazian, D.M. Purification and Reconstitution of Functional Shaker K+ Channels Assayed with a Light-Driven Voltage-Control System. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 1295–1299, doi:10.1021/bi00172a002.
  • 70. Correa, A.M.; Bezanilla, F.; Agnew, W.S. Voltage activation of purified eel sodium channels reconstituted into artificial liposomes. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 6230–6240, doi:10.1021/bi00478a017.
  • 71. Arora, M.; Kiran, B.; Rani, S.; Rani, A.; Kaur, B.; Mittal, N. Heavy metal accumulation in vegetables irrigated with water from different sources. Food Chemistry 2008, 111, 811–815, doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.049.
  • 72. Annabi-Trabelsi, N.; Guermazi, W.; Karam, Q.; Ali, M.; Uddin, S.; Leignel, V.; Ayadi, H. Concentrations of trace metals in phytoplankton and zooplankton in the Gulf of Gabès, Tunisia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2021, 168, 112392, doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112392.
  • 73. Park, J.H.; Chon, H.-T. Characterization of cadmium biosorption by Exiguobacterium sp. isolated from farmland soil near Cu-Pb-Zn mine. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2016, 23, 11814–11822, doi:10.1007/s11356-016-6335-8.
  • 74. Mapanda, F.; Mangwayana, E.N.; Nyamangara, J.; Giller, K.E. The effect of long-term irrigation using wastewater on heavy metal contents of soils under vegetables in Harare, Zimbabwe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2005, 107, 151–165, doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.11.005.
  • 75. Vishnivetskaya, T.A.; Kathariou, S.; Tiedje, J.M. The Exiguobacterium genus: biodiversity and biogeography. Extremophiles 2009, 13, 541–555, doi:10.1007/s00792-009-0243-5.
  • 76. De, A.; Bose, R.; Kumar, A.; Mozumdar, S. Management of Insect Pests Using Nanotechnology: As Modern Approaches. In Targeted Delivery of Pesticides Using Biodegradable Polymeric Nanoparticles; 2014; pp. 29–33 ISBN 978-81-322-1688-9.
  • 77. Cucini, C.; Leo, C.; Vitale, M.; Frati, F.; Carapelli, A.; Nardi, F. Bacterial and fungal diversity in the gut of polystyrene-fed Alphitobius diaperinus (Insecta: Coleoptera). Animal Gene 2020, 17–18, 200109, doi:10.1016/j.angen.2020.200109.
  • 78. Yadav, B.; Pandey, A.; Kumar, L.R.; Tyagi, R.D. Bioconversion of waste (water)/residues to bioplastics- A circular bioeconomy approach. Bioresource Technology 2020, 298, 122584, doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122584.
  • 79. Jang, S.; Kikuchi, Y. Impact of the insect gut microbiota on ecology, evolution, and industry. Current Opinion in Insect Science 2020, 41, 33–39, doi:10.1016/j.cois.2020.06.004.
  • 80. Pawar, K.D.; Banskar, S.; Rane, S.D.; Charan, S.S.; Kulkarni, G.J.; Sawant, S.S.; Ghate, H. V; Patole, M.S.; Shouche, Y.S. Bacterial diversity in different regions of gastrointestinal tract of Giant African Snail (Achatina fulica). MicrobiologyOpen 2012, 1, 415–426, doi:10.1002/mbo3.38.
  • 81. Esquivel, D.M.S. Magnetic nanoparticles in social insects: Are they the geomagnetic sensors? In Proceedings of the Entomological Society of America. Annual Meeting; 2007; p. 574.
  • 82. Binhi, V. Stochastic dynamics of magnetic nanoparticles and a mechanism of biological orientation in the geomagnetic field. arXiv: Biological Physics 2004, 1–8.
  • 83. Atalla, M.M.; Zeinab, H.K.; Eman, R.H.; Amani, A.Y.; Abeer, A. Screening of some marine-derived fungal isolates for lignin degrading enzymes (LDEs) production. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2010, 1, 591–599.
  • 84. Gao, H.; Yao, H. Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101, 7851–7856, doi:10.1073/pnas.0400757101.
  • 85. Bao, X.; Reuss, L.; Altenberg, G.A. Regulation of Purified and Reconstituted Connexin 43 Hemichannels by Protein Kinase C-mediated Phosphorylation of Serine 368. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2004, 279, 20058–20066, doi:10.1074/jbc.M311137200.
  • 86. Ravi Kumar, M.N.V.; Bakowsky, U.; Lehr, C.M. Preparation and characterization of cationic PLGA nanospheres as DNA carriers. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 1771–1777, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.069.
  • 87. Amaduzzi, F.; Bomboi, F.; Bonincontro, A.; Bordi, F.; Casciardi, S.; Chronopoulou, L.; Diociaiuti, M.; Mura, F.; Palocci, C.; Sennato, S. Chitosan–DNA complexes: Charge inversion and DNA condensation. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2014, 114, 1–10, doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.09.029.
  • 88. Muzzarelli, R.A.A. Chitin; Pergamon Press: Ancona, 1977; ISBN 9781483159461.
There are 88 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Reviews
Authors

Mehmet Bektas This is me

Ozlem Barıs This is me

Publication Date October 16, 2021
Submission Date September 23, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: Volume 1 Issue: Issue 1

Cite