A Bayesian Approach to Estimating Extinction Risk in Critically Endangered Amphibians

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 255 - 269, 01.09.2025

Kavina Ganapathy , Sachin Sharma Nishant Bhardwaj Arvind Kumar Pandey D. Alex Anand Prabhat Kumar Sahu

https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.1763905

Abstract

Amphibians are one of the most imperiled groups of vertebrates; many species worldwide are intrinsically susceptible to extinction due to habitat loss, climate change, disease, and various other anthropogenic factors. Deterministic models often fail to capture the complex and diverse nature of uncertainty exhibited in ecological data, particularly for species with limited data. Our study presents a Bayesian modeling framework that estimates extinction risk in critically endangered amphibians, utilizing input from both prior ecological knowledge and limited observational data to produce probabilistic estimates of extinction risk. We developed hierarchical models to generate an unpredictable extinction risk based on species-specific life-history traits, fragmentation indices, and exposure to threats. The Bayesian framework is advantageous as it accounts for the uncertainty of the data and provides an updated extinction risk estimate with new information as it becomes available, which is crucial for the adaptive management of conservation. The model we applied to explore extinction risk across 50 critically endangered amphibian species in various parts of the globe illustrates considerably different extinction risks. Disease prevalence and microhabitat specialization were the two primary predictors of extinction risk for a highly threatened group of vertebrates. We demonstrate the application and utility of Bayesian modeling in the context of developing extinction risk in conservation biology. It affords a statistically robust, transparent, and flexible means to advance the protection of extinct species by prioritizing species and acting with targeted mitigation measures under significant uncertainties.

Keywords

Bayesian , Extinction Risk , Critically Endangered , Amphibians , Estimation , Conservation , Uncertainty I. Introduction

References

• Aghazadeh, B., Mazinani, M., & Mahdavi, G. H. (2016). Impact of Climate Conditions on the Place and Role of Religion in Ancient Iran Stratification System. International Academic Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 59–72.
• Akçakaya, H. R., Ferson, S., Burgman, M. A., Keith, D. A., Mace, G. M., & Todd, C. R. (2000). Making consistent IUCN classifications under uncertainty. Conservation biology, 14(4), 1001-1013. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99125.x
• Bielby, J., Cooper, N., Cunningham, A., Garner, T. W. J., & Purvis, A. J. C. L. (2008). Predicting susceptibility to future declines in the world's frogs. Conservation Letters, 1(2), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00015.x
• Boakes, E. H., Rout, T. M., & Collen, B. (2015). Inferring species extinction: the use of sighting records. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6(6), 678-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12365
• Brook, B. W., Sodhi, N. S., & Bradshaw, C. J. (2008). Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends in ecology & evolution, 23(8), 453-460.
• Brook, B. W., Tonkyn, D. W., O'Grady, J. J., & Frankham, R. (2002). Contribution of inbreeding to extinction risk in threatened species. Conservation Ecology, 6(1).
• Butchart, S. H., Stattersfield, A. J., & Brooks, T. M. (2006). Going or gone: definingPossibly Extinct'species to give a truer picture of recent extinctions. Bulletin-British Ornithologists Club, 126, 7.
• Clark, J. S. (2005). Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecology letters, 8(1), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00702.x
• Collen, B., Dulvy, N. K., Gaston, K. J., Gärdenfors, U., Keith, D. A., Punt, A. E., ... & Akçakaya, H. R. (2016). Clarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the IUCN Red List. Biology letters, 12(4), 20150843. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0843
• Dennis, R. L. H., Dapporto, L., Fattorini, S., & Cook, L. M. (2019). The general dynamic model and the island biogeography of insects. Journal of Biogeography, 46(1), 202–219.
• Ficetola, G. F., Mazel, F., & Thuiller, W. (2017). Global determinants of zoogeographical boundaries. Nature ecology & evolution, 1(4), 0089. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0089
• Gayathiri, M., & Nithyakalyani, S. (2019). Trajectory Mining Using Uncertain Sensor Data Model with Probabilistic Suffix Tree. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Emerging Technology, 10(2), 42-49.
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429258411
• Gilvaei, V. G., Riahi, M., & Param, A. (2014). Design of Music house Inspired by Splashing Raindrops to approach Environmental Protection. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering, 1(1), 137–144.
• Hof, C., Araújo, M. B., Jetz, W., & Rahbek, C. (2011). Additive threats from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian diversity. Nature, 480(7378), 516-519. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10650
• Jaiswal, H., & Pradhan, S. (2023). The Economic Significance of Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas for Developing Nations. Aquatic Ecosystems and Environmental Frontiers, 1(1), 1-5.
• Jarić, I., & Roberts, D. L. (2014). Accounting for observation reliability when inferring extinction based on sighting records. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23(11), 2801-2815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0749-8
• Kéry, M., & Schaub, M. (2011). Bayesian population analysis using WinBUGS: a hierarchical perspective. Academic press.
• Lee, T. M., Jetz, W., & Campbell, K. (2017). Uncertainty and extinction risk in global conservation assessments. Ecology Letters, 20(11), 1523–1531.
• Link, W. A., & Barker, R. J. (2009). Bayesian inference: with ecological applications. Academic Press.
• McCARTHY, M. A., & Masters, P. I. P. (2005). Profiting from prior information in Bayesian analyses of ecological data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1012-1019.
• Murray, K. A., Rosauer, D., McCallum, H., & Skerratt, L. F. (2017). Integrating species distribution models and extinction risk analysis for conservation planning. Ecological Applications, 21(3), 676–689.
• Mustapha, S. B., Alkali, A., Zongoma, B. A., & Mohammed, D. (2017). Effects of climatic factors on preference for climate change adaptation strategies among food crop farmers in Borno State, Nigeria. Int Acad Inst Sci Technol, 4, 23-31.
• Rao, A., & Menon, P. (2024). A Review of Membrane Filtrating Methods for Contaminant/Pollution Removal in Water and Sewage Treatment. Engineering Perspectives in Filtration and Separation, 1-6.
• Safavi, R., & Omidi, F. (2015). Effects of Core Self-Evaluations and Psychological Climate on Work Engagement (Case Study: Hotel Employees Khuzestan.). International Academic Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 2(2), 7-20.
• Saidova, K., Abdullayeva, S., Yakubova, D., Gudalov, M., Abdurahmonova, K., Khudoykulova, H., ... & Zokirov, K. (2024). Assessing the Economic Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation and Adoption Strategies for Aquatic Ecosystem. International Journal of Research and Environmental Studies, 4, 20-26. https://doi.org/10.70102/IJARES/V4S1/4
• Scheele, B. C., Pasmans, F., Skerratt, L. F., Berger, L., Martel, A. N., Beukema, W., ... & Canessa, S. (2019). Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science, 363(6434), 1459-1463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0379
• Sharipov, S., Gudalov, M., Nematov, O., Tovbaev, G., Kasimov, N., Mirzaeva, A., & Khazratqulov, K. (2024). Effects and Consequences of Climate Change on the Natural Conditions of Mirzachol District. Natural and Engineering Sciences, 9(2), 257-269. https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.1574448
• Solow, A. R. (1993). Inferring extinction from sighting data. Ecology, 74(3), 962-964. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940821