Reshaping the Balance: How Gilman Critiques and Constructs a Feminist Utopia in Herland

Abstract

Based on the perspective of utopian fiction, this article examines Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Herland from three critical angles: social systems, gender consciousness, and ecological environment. In terms of social institutions, this article contends that Gilman uses Herland to criticise social Darwinism; in terms of gender consciousness, the article contends that Gilman designs the ideal characteristics of an independent woman by describing the duality of her characters; finally, in terms of the ecological environment, Gilman consciously connects women to Mother Earth, thus completing a critique of the industrial model of patriarchal reality and the problem of environmental protection. However, Herland also has some limitations. In some ways, the characterisation of women of purely Aryan descent reflects Gilman’s ethnocentric tendencies. Gilman combines eugenics and feminism, and her sense of racial superiority arises from the interplay of the specific historical circumstances of the time. In any case, as a female utopian novel, its critique of the social reality of the time is profound, and its exploration of an ideal society is positive.

Keywords

• Charlotte Perkins Gilman
• Herland
• feminism
• utopian fiction
• feminist fiction

Dengeyi Yeniden Şekillendirmek: Gilman, Herland’da Feminist Ütopyayı Nasıl Eleştiriyor ve İnşa Ediyor?

Abstract

Ütopik türün bakış açısına dayanan bu makale, Herland’ı üç perspektiften incelemektedir: toplumsal yapı, cinsiyet bilinci ve ekolojik çevre. Makale, sosyal kurumlar açısından Gilman'ın Herland’ı sosyal Darwinizm eleştirisinde bulunmak icin kullandığını, cinsiyet bilinci açısındansa bağımsız bir kadının ideal özelliklerini karakterlerin ikililiklerini çizerek tasarladığını ileri sürer. Son olarak, ekolojik çevre açısından Gilman kadınları bilinçli olarak Toprak Ana ile ilişkilendirerek endüstriyel ataerkil gerçeklik modelini ve çevreyi koruma sorununun eleştirisini tamamlamış olur. Bununla birlikte, Herland’ın da bazı kısıtlılıkları vardır. Bazı yönlerden, saf Aryan soydan gelme kadınların karakterizasyonu Gilman’ın etnomerkezci eğilimlerini yansıtmaktadır. Gilman soy ıslahı ve feminizmi birleştirir, yazarın üstün ırk algısı ise dönemin belirli tarihsel koşullarının etkileşiminden doğar. Her halükarda, feminist bir ütopya romanı olarak, Herland'ın toplumsal gerçeklik eleştirisi derin, ideal toplum incelemesi ise yapıcıdır.

Keywords

• Charlotte Perkins Gilman
• Herland
• feminizm
• ütopik kurmaca
• feminist kurmaca

References

1. Burwell, Jennifer. Notes on Nowhere: Feminism, Utopian Logic, and Social Transformation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.
2. Claeys, Gregory. The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
3. Doak, Mary. “Review on The Task of Utopia: A Pragmatist and Feminist Perspective.” American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 24.3 (2003): 288.
4. Elliott, Robert C. The Shape of Utopia: Studies in a Literary Genre. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
5. Fawaz, Ramzi, Justin Hall, and Helen M. Kinsella. “Discovering Paradise Islands: the Politics and Pleasures of Feminist Utopias, A Conversation.” Feminist Review 116 (2017): 2.
6. Foucault, Michel. “The Eye of Power.” In The Impossible Person, edited by Alex Farquharson, 8-15. Notthingham: Notthingham Contemporary, 2004
7. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. Herland. Lisle: Project Gutenberg, 1992.
8. Lane, Ann J. The Charlotte Perkins Gilman Reader: The Yellow Wallpaper and Other Fiction. New York: Patheon Books, 1980.

9. Lane, Ann J.. To Herland and Beyond: the Life and Work of Charlotte Perkins Gilman. London: University Press of Virginia, 1997.
10. Millett, Kate. Sexual Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.
11. Plant, Judith. Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1989.
12. Sargisson, Lucy. Contemporary Feminist Utopianism. London: Routledge, 1996.
13. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ware: Wordsworth Editions, 1992.
14. Stein, Karen F. “Inclusion and Exclusion in Some Feminist Utopian Fictions.” In Women’s Utopian and Dystopian Fiction, edited by Sharon R. Wilson, 112-133. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2013.
15. Yinhe, Li. Feminism. Shanghai: Shanghai Culture Press, 2018.