Research Article

Fuad Köprülü’s Evolution: From Cosmopolitan Thought to National Historiography (1909-­1913)

Number: 8 April 30, 2025
  • Fatih Altuğ
EN TR

Fuad Köprülü’s Evolution: From Cosmopolitan Thought to National Historiography (1909-­1913)

Abstract

This article examines the conceptual transformation of evolution in Fuad Köprülü’s writings between 1909 and 1913, tracing his intellectual trajectory from cosmopolitan literary sociology to nationalist philology. Initially engaging with Darwinian, Spencerian, and Tainean models of cultural development, Köprülü deployed evolutionary discourse to articulate a comparative and transnational theory of literature. His early essays treat evolution as a gradual and pluralist unfolding of aesthetic and intellectual refinement. However, following the Balkan Wars and under the influence of nationalist thought, Köprülü reimagines evolution as a voluntarist and vitalist force for national rebirth. Drawing on mutationism, Bergson’s creative evolution, and Gökalp’s cultural sociology, he reframes evolution as rupture, will, and methodological foundation. The article demonstrates how this conceptual reorientation culminates in Köprülü’s “Türk Edebiyatı Tarihinde Usûl,” which institutionalizes literary history as a national science. By analyzing this shift, the article reveals how Köprülü transformed a European-derived concept into the epistemological core of Turkish literary historiography.

Keywords

References

  1. Akün, Ömer Faruk. “Mehmed Fuad Köprülü.” TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi. Accessed April 2, 2025. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/mehmed-fuad-koprulu.
  2. Allen, Garland E. “Hugo de Vries and the Reception of the ‘Mutation Theory’.” Journal of the History of Biology 2 (1969): 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137268.
  3. Altuğ, Fatih. “İmparatorlukla Ulus-Devlet Arasında Kozmopolit Fuad Köprülü’nün Milli Edebiyata İhtidası.” In Mehmet Fuat Köprülü, edited by Yahya Kemal Taştan, 119–130. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları, 2012.
  4. Altuğ, Fatih. “The Entangled History of Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism in Modern Turkish Literature.” In Turkish Literature as World Literature, edited by Çimen Günay-Erkol and Burcu Alkan, 19–35. London: Bloomsbury, 2024.
  5. Apter, Emily. Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. London: Verso, 2013.
  6. Damrosch, David. What Is World Literature? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
  7. Gündoğdu, Servet, and Kaan Kurt, eds. Usûlden Yönteme: M. Fuad Köprülü’nün Edebiyat Tarihçiliği. Istanbul: VakıfBank Kültür Yayınları, 2022.
  8. Kjældgaard, Lasse Horne. “Georg Brandes’ Literary Darwinism.” In Georg Brandes: Pioneer of Comparative Literature and Global Public Intellectual, edited by Jens Bjerring-Hansen, Anders Engberg-Pedersen, and Lasse Horne Kjældgaard, 81–96. Leiden: Brill, 2024.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Literary Theory , Literary Studies (Other) , Modern Turkish Literature in Turkiye Field , Turkish Language and Literature (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

April 30, 2025

Submission Date

April 3, 2025

Acceptance Date

April 24, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Number: 8

Chicago
Altuğ, Fatih. 2025. “Fuad Köprülü’s Evolution: From Cosmopolitan Thought to National Historiography (1909-­1913)”. Nesir: Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, nos. 8: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15261091.

Authors retain copyright of the works they submit to Nesir: Journal of Literary Studies, while agreeing to distribute their work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, others may share, reproduce, distribute, and reuse the work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s), the title of the work, and the name of the journal. Nesir holds only the first publishing rights; all copyright remains with the author(s).